12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cone-Beam CT Virtual Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Pleural Metastasis: A Pilot Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate the diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) virtual navigation-guided percutaneous pleural biopsy for suspected malignant pleural disease.

          Materials and Methods

          This study enrolled 59 patients (31 males and 28 females; mean age, 63.4 years) with suspected malignant pleural disease diagnosed with CBCT from December 2010 to December 2016. Sixty-three CBCT-guided biopsies were performed using a coaxial system with 18- or 20-gauge cutting needles. Procedural details, diagnostic performance, radiation exposure, and complication rates were investigated.

          Results

          The mean diameter perpendicular to the pleura of 51 focal and 12 diffuse pleural lesions was 1.53 ± 0.76 cm. The mean distance from the skin to the target was 3.40 ± 1.51 cm. Mean numbers of CT acquisitions and biopsies were 3.21 ± 0.57 and 3.05 ± 1.54. Total procedure time and coaxial introducer indwelling time were 11.87 ± 5.59 min and 8.78 ± 4.95 min, respectively. The mean dose area product was 12013.61 ± 7969.59 mGym 2. There were 48 malignant, 10 benign, and 5 indeterminate lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 93.8% (45/48), 100% (10/10), and 94.8% (55/58), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values for malignancy were 100% (45/45) and 76.9% (10/13), respectively. Four patients (6.8%) with benign pathology during initial biopsy but still showing a high suspicion of malignancy underwent repeat biopsy and three of them were finally diagnosed with malignant pleural disease. There were three cases of minimal pneumothorax and no grave procedure-related complications.

          Conclusion

          Cone-beam computed tomography-guided biopsy is an accurate and safe diagnostic technique for suspected malignant pleural lesion with reasonable radiation exposure and procedure time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules: clinical experience in 1108 patients.

          To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance and complications of C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) in 1108 patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            CT in differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease.

            The CT features of benign and malignant pleural diseases have been described. However, the accuracy of these features in the differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease has not been assessed before. Without knowledge of clinical or pathologic data, we reviewed the CT findings in 74 consecutive patients with proved diffuse pleural disease (39 malignant and 35 benign). The patients included 53 men and 21 women 23-78 years old. Features that were helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign pleural disease were (1) circumferential pleural thickening, (2) nodular pleural thickening, (3) parietal pleural thickening greater than 1 cm, and (4) mediastinal pleural involvement. The specificities of these findings were 100%, 94%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. The sensitivities were 41%, 51%, 36%, and 56%, respectively. Twenty-eight of 39 malignant cases (sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 83%) were identified correctly by the presence of one or more of these criteria. Malignant mesothelioma (n = 11) could not be reliably differentiated from pleural metastases (n = 24). We conclude that CT is helpful in the differential diagnosis of diffuse pleural disease, particularly in differentiation of malignant from benign conditions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of small (≤ 1 cm) lung nodules under C-arm cone-beam CT virtual navigation guidance.

              To describe our initial experience with percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PCNB) of small (≤1 cm) lung nodules using a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) virtual navigation guidance system in 105 consecutive patients. One hundred and five consecutive patients (55 male, 50 female; mean age, 62 years) with 107 small (≤1 cm) lung nodules (mean size, 0.85 cm ± 0.14) underwent PCNBs under CBCT virtual-navigation guidance system and constituted our study population. Procedural details-including radiation dose, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of CBCT virtual navigation guided PCNBs-were described. The mean number of pleural passages with the coaxial needle, biopsies, CT acquisitions, total procedure time, coaxial introducer dwelling time, and estimated radiation exposure during PCNBs were 1.03 ± 0.21, 3.1 ± 0.7, 3.4 ± 1.3, 10.5 min ± 3.2 and 7.2 min ± 2.5, and 5.72 mSv ± 4.19, respectively. Sixty nodules (56.1 %) were diagnosed as malignant, 38 (35.5 %) as benign and nine (8.4 %) as indeterminate. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CBCT virtual-navigation-guided PCNB for small (≤1 cm) nodules were 96.7 % (58/60), 100 % (38/38) and 98.0 % (96/98), respectively. Complications occurred in 13 (12.1 %) cases; pneumothorax in seven (6.5 %) and haemoptysis in six (5.6 %). CBCT virtual-navigation-guided PCNB is a highly accurate and safe diagnostic method for small (≤1 cm) nodules.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Radiol
                Korean J Radiol
                KJR
                Korean Journal of Radiology
                The Korean Society of Radiology
                1229-6929
                2005-8330
                Sep-Oct 2018
                06 August 2018
                : 19
                : 5
                : 872-879
                Affiliations
                Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Chang Min Park, MD, Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. Tel: (822) 2072-0367, Fax: (822) 743-6385, cmpark.morphius@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.872
                6082769
                30174476
                037adb1b-a754-4fd6-8c0c-778f25a11581
                Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Radiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 November 2017
                : 06 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Health and Welfare, CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003625;
                Award ID: HC15C3390
                Funded by: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, CrossRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003052;
                Award ID: 10041618
                Categories
                Thoracic Imaging
                Original Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                cone-beam computed tomography,virtual navigation guidance,pleura,biopsy,metastasis

                Comments

                Comment on this article