13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Phase III Trial Investigating the Glycemic Efficacy and Safety Profile of Fixed-Dose Combination Dapagliflozin and Linagliptin Over Linagliptin Monotherapy in Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Metformin

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin (10 mg) and linagliptin (5 mg) in comparison to linagliptin 5 mg (Trajenta) in patients with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on metformin monotherapy.

          Methods

          The double-blind, randomized, multicentric, parallel-group phase III trial screened 287 adult patients with T2DM (age 18–65 years) from 16 sites across India. The recruited subjects were undergoing metformin monotherapy ≥ 1000 mg/day for at least 28 days. Patients with HbA1c of 7.5–10.5% (58–91 mmol/l) ( n = 232) after 2 weeks of run-in period with linagliptin monotherapy and placebo dapagliflozin/linagliptin on metformin monotherapy were randomized (1:1) in parallel to once daily dapagliflozin/linagliptin 10/5 mg or linagliptin 5 mg for 16 weeks. Patients were stratified on the basis of HbA1c (≤ 9.0% and > 9.0%; ≤ 75 mmol/l and > 75 mmol/l)). A total of 225 subjects completed 16 weeks of treatment, 115 patients in the test group and 110 patients in the reference group.

          Results

          Dapagliflozin/linagliptin ( p = 0.0003) exhibited a greater change in HbA1c from baseline than linagliptin ( p < 0.0001) in 16 weeks (mean reduction, − 1.28% vs − 0.83%). Test group showed a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and body weight compared to the reference group. The FDC was well tolerated with adverse events being more frequent in the reference group. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in the study.

          Conclusion

          Dapagliflozin/linagliptin combination is a novel dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4)/sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor FDC approved in India for patients with T2DM. Potential limitations of this study are a small dose of dapagliflozin (10 mg) in the FDC, a short study duration (30 weeks) and a high minimum threshold for HbA1c (≤ 7.5%; ≤ 53 mmol/l). Results indicate the FDC to be a superior therapeutic option over linagliptin for patients with T2DM on metformin monotherapy.

          Trial Registration

          CTRI/2022/08/044563; 01/08/2022.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-023-01504-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

          The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes convened a panel to update the previous consensus statements on the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes in adults, published since 2006 and last updated in 2019. The target audience is the full spectrum of the professional health care team providing diabetes care in the U.S. and Europe. A systematic examination of publications since 2018 informed new recommendations. These include additional focus on social determinants of health, the health care system, and physical activity behaviors, including sleep. There is a greater emphasis on weight management as part of the holistic approach to diabetes management. The results of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials involving sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, including assessment of subgroups, inform broader recommendations for cardiorenal protection in people with diabetes at high risk of cardiorenal disease. After a summary listing of consensus recommendations, practical tips for implementation are provided.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients.

              Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lower glycemia by enhancing urinary glucose excretion. The physiologic response to pharmacologically induced acute or chronic glycosuria has not been investigated in human diabetes. We evaluated 66 patients with type 2 diabetes (62 ± 7 years, BMI = 31.6 ± 4.6 kg/m(2), HbA1c = 55 ± 8 mmol/mol, mean ± SD) at baseline, after a single dose, and following 4-week treatment with empagliflozin (25 mg). At each time point, patients received a mixed meal coupled with dual-tracer glucose administration and indirect calorimetry. Both single-dose and chronic empagliflozin treatment caused glycosuria during fasting (median, 7.8 [interquartile range {IQR}, 4.4] g/3 hours and 9.2 [IQR, 5.2] g/3 hours) and after meal ingestion (median, 29.0 [IQR, 12.5] g/5 hours and 28.2 [IQR, 15.4] g/5 hours). After 3 hours of fasting, endogenous glucose production (EGP) was increased 25%, while glycemia was 0.9 ± 0.7 mmol/l lower (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). After meal ingestion, glucose and insulin AUC decreased, whereas the glucagon response increased (all P < 0.001). While oral glucose appearance was unchanged, EGP was increased (median, 40 [IQR, 14] g and 37 [IQR, 11] g vs. 34 [IQR, 11] g, both P < 0.01). Tissue glucose disposal was reduced (median, 75 [IQR, 16] g and 70 [IQR, 21] g vs. 93 [IQR, 18] g, P < 0.0001), due to a decrease in both glucose oxidation and nonoxidative glucose disposal, with a concomitant rise in lipid oxidation after chronic administration (all P < 0.01). β Cell glucose sensitivity increased (median, 55 [IQR, 35] pmol • min(-1) • m(-2) • mM(-1) and 55 [IQR, 39] pmol • min(-1) • m(-2) • mM(-1) vs. 44 [IQR, 32] pmol • min(-1) • m(-2) • mM(-1), P < 0.0001), and insulin sensitivity was improved. Resting energy expenditure rates and those after meal ingestion were unchanged. In patients with type 2 diabetes, empagliflozin-induced glycosuria improved β cell function and insulin sensitivity, despite the fall in insulin secretion and tissue glucose disposal and the rise in EGP after one dose, thereby lowering fasting and postprandial glycemia. Chronic dosing shifted substrate utilization from carbohydrate to lipid. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT01248364 (EudraCT no. 2010-018708-99). Funding. This study was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jainaditik@gmail.com , a.jain-16@sms.ed.ac.uk
                Journal
                Diabetes Ther
                Diabetes Ther
                Diabetes Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                1869-6953
                1869-6961
                14 November 2023
                14 November 2023
                January 2024
                : 15
                : 1
                : 215-227
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Deanery of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, ( https://ror.org/01nrxwf90) Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ]SRV Hospital, Mumbai, India
                [3 ]Lifepoint Multispecialty Hospital, Pune, India
                [4 ]GRID grid.418546.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1799 577X, School of Tropical Medicine, ; Kolkata, India
                [5 ]GRID grid.413204.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1768 2335, Medical College and Hospital, ; Kolkata, India
                [6 ]GRID grid.419208.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1767 1767, Andhra Medical College, ; Vishakhapatnam, India
                [7 ]GRID grid.416065.0, SMS Hospital, ; Jaipur, India
                [8 ]Shree Ashirwaad Hospital, Mumbai, India
                [9 ]V.S. General Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
                [10 ]Medipoint Hospital, Pune, India
                [11 ]Trauma Care Hospital, Mumbai, India
                [12 ]Department of Medicine, Visakha Institute of Medical Science, Vishakhapatnam, India
                [13 ]Lokmanya Multispecialty and Accident Hospital, Nashik, India
                [14 ]Sanjeevani Criticare and Research Center, Nashik, India
                [15 ]AIMS Hospital, ( https://ror.org/05ahcwz21) Mumbai, India
                [16 ]Shushrusha Navneet Memorial Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
                [17 ]Apex Hospital Pvt. Ltd, Jaipur, India
                [18 ]GRID grid.497415.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1766 7602, Medical Department, , Alkem Laboratories, ; Mumbai, India
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2617-2512
                Article
                1504
                10.1007/s13300-023-01504-3
                10786755
                37957465
                032d07a3-5666-4845-82df-08b630754aec
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 September 2023
                : 23 October 2023
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                dapagliflozin,linagliptin,type 2 diabetes,glycemic control,metformin,randomized trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article