46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Esketamine Nasal Spray for the Rapid Reduction of Depressive Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder With Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Purpose/Background

          Numerous health authority approvals of esketamine nasal spray, combined with oral antidepressant, to treat depressive symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder and acute suicidal ideation or behavior were based on 2 identically designed, double-blind, phase 3 studies.

          Methods/Procedures

          Across both ASPIRE studies (NCT03039192, NCT03097133), patients (N = 456) were randomized to esketamine 84 mg or placebo nasal spray twice weekly for 4 weeks plus comprehensive standard of care, including hospitalization and newly initiated or optimized antidepressant(s). In post hoc analyses of pooled data, changes from baseline at 24 hours after the first dose in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score and Clinical Global Impression–Severity of Suicidality–Revised, in the full cohort and in subgroups, were analyzed using analysis of covariance.

          Findings/Results

          Esketamine plus standard of care demonstrated significantly greater improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score versus placebo plus standard of care at 24 hours (least square mean difference [95% confidence interval], −3.8 [−5.75 to −1.89]) and at earlier (4 hours: −3.4 [−5.05 to −1.71]) and later time points (day 25: −3.4 [−5.36 to −1.36]). The between-group difference (95% confidence interval) for change in Clinical Global Impression–Severity of Suicidality–Revised at 24 hours was −0.20 (−0.43 to 0.04) for all patients and −0.31 (−0.61 to −0.01) for those with a history of suicide attempt. Common adverse events (≥20%) during esketamine treatment were dizziness, dissociation, nausea, somnolence, and headache.

          Implications/Conclusions

          Esketamine plus comprehensive standard of care rapidly reduces depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder who have acute suicidal ideation or behavior, especially in those with a history of suicide attempt, providing a new treatment option for this particularly ill and vulnerable population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

          Up-to-date evidence about levels and trends in disease and injury incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) is an essential input into global, regional, and national health policies. In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013), we estimated these quantities for acute and chronic diseases and injuries for 188 countries between 1990 and 2013.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults.

            Research on suicide prevention and interventions requires a standard method for assessing both suicidal ideation and behavior to identify those at risk and to track treatment response. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was designed to quantify the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior. The authors examined the psychometric properties of the scale. The C-SSRS's validity relative to other measures of suicidal ideation and behavior and the internal consistency of its intensity of ideation subscale were analyzed in three multisite studies: a treatment study of adolescent suicide attempters (N=124); a medication efficacy trial with depressed adolescents (N=312); and a study of adults presenting to an emergency department for psychiatric reasons (N=237). The C-SSRS demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity with other multi-informant suicidal ideation and behavior scales and had high sensitivity and specificity for suicidal behavior classifications compared with another behavior scale and an independent suicide evaluation board. Both the ideation and behavior subscales were sensitive to change over time. The intensity of ideation subscale demonstrated moderate to strong internal consistency. In the adolescent suicide attempters study, worst-point lifetime suicidal ideation on the C-SSRS predicted suicide attempts during the study, whereas the Scale for Suicide Ideation did not. Participants with the two highest levels of ideation severity (intent or intent with plan) at baseline had higher odds for attempting suicide during the study. These findings suggest that the C-SSRS is suitable for assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior in clinical and research settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epidemiology of Adult DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States

              Question What is the national prevalence of DSM-5 major depressive disorder, the DSM-5 anxious/distressed and mixed-features specifiers, and their clinical correlates? Findings In this national survey of 36 309 US adults, the 12-month and lifetime prevalences of major depressive disorder were 10.4% and 20.6%, respectively, with most being moderate (6-7 symptoms) or severe (8-9 symptoms) and associated with comorbidity and impairment. The anxious/distressed specifier characterized 74.6% of major depressive disorder cases, and the mixed-features specifier characterized 15.5%; almost 70% with lifetime major depressive disorder received some type of treatment. Meaning Major depressive disorder remains a serious US health problem, with much to be learned about its specifiers. Importance No US national data are available on the prevalence and correlates of DSM-5 –defined major depressive disorder (MDD) or on MDD specifiers as defined in DSM-5 . Objective To present current nationally representative findings on the prevalence, correlates, psychiatric comorbidity, functioning, and treatment of DSM-5 MDD and initial information on the prevalence, severity, and treatment of DSM-5 MDD severity, anxious/distressed specifier, and mixed-features specifier, as well as cases that would have been characterized as bereavement in DSM-IV . Design, Setting, and Participants In-person interviews with a representative sample of US noninstitutionalized civilian adults (≥18 years) (n = 36 309) who participated in the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III (NESARC-III). Data were collected from April 2012 to June 2013 and were analyzed in 2016-2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of DSM-5 MDD and the DSM-5 specifiers. Odds ratios (ORs), adjusted ORs (aORs), and 95% CIs indicated associations with demographic characteristics and other psychiatric disorders. Results Of the 36 309 adult participants in NESARC-III, 12-month and lifetime prevalences of MDD were 10.4% and 20.6%, respectively. Odds of 12-month MDD were significantly lower in men (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.46-0.55) and in African American (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.54-0.68), Asian/Pacific Islander (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.45-0.67), and Hispanic (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78) adults than in white adults and were higher in younger adults (age range, 18-29 years; OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.48-3.55) and those with low incomes ($19 999 or less; OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.49-2.04). Associations of MDD with psychiatric disorders ranged from an aOR of 2.1 (95% CI, 1.84-2.35) for specific phobia to an aOR of 5.7 (95% CI, 4.98-6.50) for generalized anxiety disorder. Associations of MDD with substance use disorders ranged from an aOR of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.63-2.01) for alcohol to an aOR of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.57-3.55) for any drug. Most lifetime MDD cases were moderate (39.7%) or severe (49.5%). Almost 70% with lifetime MDD had some type of treatment. Functioning among those with severe MDD was approximately 1 SD below the national mean. Among 12.9% of those with lifetime MDD, all episodes occurred just after the death of someone close and lasted less than 2 months. The anxious/distressed specifier characterized 74.6% of MDD cases, and the mixed-features specifier characterized 15.5%. Controlling for severity, both specifiers were associated with early onset, poor course and functioning, and suicidality. Conclusions and Relevance Among US adults, DSM-5 MDD is highly prevalent, comorbid, and disabling. While most cases received some treatment, a substantial minority did not. Much remains to be learned about the DSM-5 MDD specifiers in the general population. This national survey of US adults presents findings on the prevalence, correlates, psychiatric comorbidity, functioning, and treatment of DSM-5 major depressive disorder.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Clin Psychopharmacol
                J Clin Psychopharmacol
                JCP
                Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0271-0749
                1533-712X
                Sep-Oct 2021
                20 August 2021
                : 41
                : 5
                : 516-524
                Affiliations
                From the []Department of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ
                []Department of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA
                []Department of Clinical Statistics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ
                Departments of [§ ]Medical Affairs
                []Medical Information, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ.
                Author notes
                [*]Reprints: Carla M. Canuso, MD, Neuroscience Clinical Development, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Rd, Titusville, NJ 08560 (e-mail: ccanuso@ 123456its.jnj.com ).
                Article
                JCP_210151 00003
                10.1097/JCP.0000000000001465
                8407443
                34412104
                03179fa9-7c9d-4ba9-abba-9cf7a21474aa
                Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 15 March 2021
                : 30 May 2021
                : 30 May 2021
                Categories
                Original Contributions
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                esketamine,major depressive disorder,suicidal ideation,rapid acting

                Comments

                Comment on this article