4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The statistical theory of linear selection indices from phenotypic to genomic selection

      research-article
      1 , , 1
      Crop Science
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A linear selection index (LSI) can be a linear combination of phenotypic values, marker scores, and genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs); phenotypic values and marker scores; or phenotypic values and GEBVs jointly. The main objective of the LSI is to predict the net genetic merit ( H), which is a linear combination of unobservable individual traits’ breeding values, weighted by the trait economic values; thus, the target of LSI is not a parameter but rather the unobserved random H values. The LSI can be single‐stage or multi‐stage, where the latter are methods for selecting one or more individual traits available at different times or stages of development in both plants and animals. Likewise, LSIs can be either constrained or unconstrained. A constrained LSI imposes predetermined genetic gain on expected genetic gain per trait and includes the unconstrained LSI as particular cases. The main LSI parameters are the selection response, the expected genetic gain per trait, and its correlation with H. When the population mean is zero, the selection response and expected genetic gain per trait are, respectively, the conditional mean of H and the genotypic values, given the LSI values. The application of LSI theory is rapidly diversifying; however, because LSIs are based on the best linear predictor and on the canonical correlation theory, the LSI theory can be explained in a simple form. We provided a review of the statistical theory of the LSI from phenotypic to genomic selection showing their relationships, advantages, and limitations, which should allow breeders to use the LSI theory confidently in breeding programs.

          Core Ideas

          • Linear selection indices (LSIs) are useful in plant and animal breeding.

          • The main LSI objective is to predict the net genetic merit of individuals.

          • We did a complete review of the statistical theory of LSIs.

          • We described the bases of genomic LSIs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references113

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

          P VanRaden (2008)
          Efficient methods for processing genomic data were developed to increase reliability of estimated breeding values and to estimate thousands of marker effects simultaneously. Algorithms were derived and computer programs tested with simulated data for 2,967 bulls and 50,000 markers distributed randomly across 30 chromosomes. Estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients required accurate estimates of allele frequencies in the base population. Linear model predictions of breeding values were computed by 3 equivalent methods: 1) iteration for individual allele effects followed by summation across loci to obtain estimated breeding values, 2) selection index including a genomic relationship matrix, and 3) mixed model equations including the inverse of genomic relationships. A blend of first- and second-order Jacobi iteration using 2 separate relaxation factors converged well for allele frequencies and effects. Reliability of predicted net merit for young bulls was 63% compared with 32% using the traditional relationship matrix. Nonlinear predictions were also computed using iteration on data and nonlinear regression on marker deviations; an additional (about 3%) gain in reliability for young bulls increased average reliability to 66%. Computing times increased linearly with number of genotypes. Estimation of allele frequencies required 2 processor days, and genomic predictions required <1 d per trait, and traits were processed in parallel. Information from genotyping was equivalent to about 20 daughters with phenotypic records. Actual gains may differ because the simulation did not account for linkage disequilibrium in the base population or selection in subsequent generations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.

            Several attempts have already been made to interpret the well-established results of biometry in accordance with the Mendelian scheme of inheritance. It is here attempted to ascertain the biometrical properties of a population of a more general type than has hitherto been examined, inheritance in which follows this scheme. It is hoped that in this way it will be possible to make a more exact analysis of the causes of human variability. The great body of available statistics show us that the deviations of a human measurement from its mean follow very closely the Normal Law of Errors, and, therefore, that the variability may be uniformly measured by the standard deviation corresponding to the square root of the mean square error. When there are two independent causes of variability capable of producing in an otherwise uniform population distributions with standard deviations σ 1 and σ 2 , it is found that the distribution, when both causes act together, has a standard deviation . It is therefore desirable in analysing the causes of variability to deal with the square of the standard deviation as the measure of variability. We shall term this quantity the Variance of the normal population to which it refers, and we may now ascribe to the constituent causes fractions or percentages of the total variance which they together produce. It is desirable on the one hand that the elementary ideas at the basis of the calculus of correlations should be clearly understood, and easily expressed in ordinary language, and on the other that loose phrases about the “percentage of causation,” which obscure the essential distinction between the individual and the population, should be carefully avoided.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.crossa@cgiar.org
                Journal
                Crop Sci
                Crop Sci
                10.1002/(ISSN)1435-0653
                CSC2
                Crop Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0011-183X
                1435-0653
                06 February 2022
                Mar-Apr 2022
                : 62
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/csc2.v62.2 )
                : 537-563
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Km 45 Carretera Mexico‐Veracruz, Edo. de Mexico Mexico DF CP 52640 Mexico
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jose Crossa, Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico‐Veracruz, Mexico DF, CP 52640, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.

                Email: j.crossa@ 123456cgiar.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-5855
                Article
                CSC220676
                10.1002/csc2.20676
                9305178
                35911794
                02f1160a-9f2e-4bd5-96f1-55be7a19697c
                © 2021 The Authors. Crop Science © 2021 Crop Science Society of America

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 July 2021
                : 27 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 27, Words: 19505
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and USAID
                Award ID: INV‐003439 BMGF/FCDO Accelerating Genetic Gains in
                Award ID: [Amend. No. 9 MTO 069033
                Award ID: USAID‐CIMMYT Wheat/AGGMW]
                Categories
                Review and Interpretation Papers
                Review and Interpretation Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March/April 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:21.07.2022

                Comments

                Comment on this article