4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Letter to the Editor: Commentary on Does the COVID-19 Screening Test Affect the Postoperative Prognosis of Patients Who Undergo Emergency Surgery for Cerebral Hemorrhage? ( Korean J Neurotrauma 2022;18:198–207)

      letter
      ,
      Korean Journal of Neurotrauma
      Korean Neurotraumatology Society

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, I had read an interesting article published in the last issue of the Korean Journal of Neurotrauma, entitled “Does the COVID-19 Screening Test Affect the Postoperative Prognosis of Patients Who Undergo Emergency Surgery for Cerebral Hemorrhage?”3) The authors focused on discussing whether the surgical results before and after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were changed by the COVID-19 screening test. There was no difference in the treatment results between the presence or absence of screening tests performed in the emergency room, effect of the difference in time to reach the operating room, or change in medical capacity due to COVID-19. In the COVID-19 era, there have been few research results related to neurosurgery with regard to COVID-19 screening tests. Several studies have been conducted on protocols or surgical recommendations for neurosurgery in patients with COVID-19.1 2 4 5 6 7) Lee et al.4) developed a clinical pathway for patients indicated for emergency brain surgery from the emergency room, applied it to the actual clinical field, and published it. These studies are thought to enable a sufficient response in a wide range of outbreaks of not only COVID-19, but also other various respiratory diseases that may occur in the future. Screening for COVID-19 is essential to ensure the safety of patients with cerebral hemorrhage and medical staff. It is very encouraging that minimal inspections on the protection of patients and medical staff do not delay neurosurgical treatment or affect patient’s prognosis. In addition, the results of this study are considered to be those showing the level of medical emergency and neurosurgery in Korea. However, it would have been more helpful if the know-how or protocol by the authors who did not delay time in the emergency room had been added and described in details. After all, thanks are due to the authors for their hard work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neurosurgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: update from Lombardy, northern Italy

          Since February, 21st 2020, when the first person infected was reported in Lombardy, Italy rapidly became home to a massive Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Currently, on 21th March, 53,578 COVID-19 cases have been confirmed in Italy. 6072 patients are now hospitalized. The number of deaths has risen to 4825 while 6072 were declared healed [4]. This data shows that Italy is, currently, the second most affected nation in the world by the epidemic, second only to China. Most of these cases occurred in Lombardy, the most populated Region of Italy, accounting for 10,060,574 people [2]. Hospitals were rapidly overcrowded by COVID-19 patients, especially intensive care units, and non-specialized doctors in infectious or respiratory diseases, including Neurosurgeons, were reassigned to the new COVID-wards to rationalize the use of resources. Hence, the regional health system, has been rapidly reprogrammed trying to contain the COVID-19 [1, 3]. In particular, for this reason, on March, 8th 2020, the Lombard Regional Council organized an emergency task force in order to lead the response to the outbreak. This viewpoint is intended to summarize the reorganization model provided inside the Lombard Neurosurgical network. Neurosurgeons and other non-specialized doctors were reassigned to the new COVID-wards. The Health system worked trying to contain COVID-19 in the region. The Lombard Regional Council called an emergency task force in order to reprogram the regional system. The Lombardy region accounts for 26 neurosurgical departments in 21 hospitals with more than 200 neurosurgeons and 40 residents in training. During the early days of the first outbreak, each neurosurgical department responded individually, and according to the number of COVID-19 positive patients present in the hospital, elective surgical activities, hospitalizations, and non-urgent outpatient visits were gradually reduced. Since March 8th 2020, the regional medical system, including neurosurgical activities, has been completely reorganized by the decision of the Lombard Regional Government (decree n° XI/2906). The regional task force has determined that all non-urgent outpatient activities had to be suspended. It was decided to remodel the hospital treatment system by identifying 4 neurosurgical “hub” hospitals where concentration of all neurosurgical activities that could not be postponed would take place. Three hub hospitals guarantee 24/7 acceptance of emergency cases. The three hospitals have been chosen on geographical bases, covering roughly 1/3 of Lombard territory divided in west, central and east, all of the other departments have been assigned to one of the three hubs as a “spoke”. The fourth “hub” hospital, the regional neuro oncological center has been re-allocated for urgent oncological patients coming from all the other departments of the region. Each department also provided some of its own neurosurgeons to be assigned to increase the staff on duty at the relative hub, accounting for personnel availability. The following clinical situations have been defined as neurosurgical emergencies - cerebral hemorrhages (subarachnoid and intraparenchymal) - acute hydrocephalus - tumors at risk of intracranial hypertension – spinal cord compressions with neurological deficit or at risk of - traumatic cranial and spinal trauma emergencies. The patients may access the hub in two ways: by primary or secondary transport. Primary transport is advised when the access is direct into the hub from the territory, the patient is evaluated by the neurosurgeon on duty, undergoes the necessary diagnostic procedures and, on symptomatic patients who need emergency intervention or hospitalization in intensive care, a COVID-19 swab is routinely carried out. Secondary transport: the patient is evaluated at the “spoke” department. If considered an urgent case, he/she is centralized to the hub hospital after the execution of a swab for COVID-19. Dealing with oncological pathology, priority criteria have been defined: Class A ++ (requiring immediate treatment): patients with intracranial or spinal oncological pathology that need emergency treatment (rapidly evolving intracranial hypertension with deteriorating state of consciousness, acute hydrocephalus, spinal cord compression with rapid tetra- or paraparesis). Class A + (requiring treatment within a maximum of 7–10 days): patients with oncological pathology (intracranial tumors with mass effect or with progressive neurological deficit, without deterioration of consciousness). Class A (requiring treatment within a month): patients with oncological neurosurgical pathology that appears radiologically of suspected malignant nature or with oncological pathology that determines a neurological deficit. Class A ++ patients will be managed like other emergencies, those in the other two classes will be managed by the oncological hub, according to clinical priorities and programmed in the allocated surgical slots. “Emergency Hubs” have doubled the number of neurosurgeons on duties with the collaboration of the colleagues from the “Spoke hospitals”. This was found necessary to safely manage more than one operating theatre at the time. 2 Neurosurgeons are on duty 8–20 h and 2 neurosurgeons are on duty 20–8 h. There is also an on-call system to provide subspecialist cover. A complex spine on call service is provided 24/7 as well as neurovascular coverage. Once the post-operative procedures have been completed, the patient will be discharged home or to a physical therapy ward if necessary. The oncological cases proposed to the “Oncological hub” by external centers are operated by the proposing teams or by mixed teams composed of external and residential surgeons. In both cases, hub staff facilitate the execution of surgical procedures by external operators. This organization was prepared to let the majority of the working force focus on COVID-19 patients, in the most affected areas. Even though we cannot have definitive data in such a short period, our preliminary impressions are that this system is sustainable, at least in the short period. This has been facilitated by the public “lockdown” that has tangibly diminished the number of traumatic cases, easing the surgical burden on hub centers. The COVID-19 emergency has forced a wider collaboration between hospitals favoring the interchange of neurosurgeons between hospitals that were once in competition, hopefully creating the basis for an interesting new standard for the Post COVID-19 period. In difficult times such as these, the cooperative spirit has risen spontaneously to previously unmet levels both inside hospitals and between different departments. We truly hope that the COVID-19 outbreak will soon end in our beloved country and that other countries may never experience such a tragic emergency. Our thanks and thoughts are to all colleagues, and not only those in the neurosurgical community, who are risking their lives to provide the best care to COVID-19 patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Demand for Elective Neurosurgery at a German University Hospital during the First Wave of COVID-19

            Background: Patients’ fear of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may delay inevitable treatment, putting potential benefits at risk. This single-center retrospective study aims to analyze temporal relationships of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany with the number of patients who sought and received elective neurosurgical treatment at a German university hospital. Methods: Daily outpatient numbers (ON) and elective procedures (EP) were recorded at our department between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2020 (baseline: between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2019). In patients who received EP, we recorded indication, outcome, and length of stay (LOS). Moving averages of ON (MAON) and of EP were calculated. Data on governmental action taken in response to the pandemic and on coronavirus-positive cases in Germany (CPCG) were superimposed. Exponential and arc tangent curves (ATC) were fitted to the absolute numbers of CPCG. Phase shifts were estimated, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, rho, was calculated between the 2020 MAON and the derivative function of the fitted ATC (DFATC). Wilcoxon rank sum served as statistical test. Significance was assumed with p values of less than 0.05. Results: ON were significantly decreased in April 2020 as compared to April 2019 (p = 0.010). A phase shift between the German lockdown, the DFATC, and the decrease in MAON was not detected, while a phase shift of 10 days between the DFATC and the subsequent increase in MAON was detected. The DFATC was significantly negatively correlated (rho = −0.92, p < 0.0001) to the MAON until 31 March 2020, and, when shifted by 10 days, the DFATC was significantly negatively correlated (rho = −0.87, p < 0.0001) to the MAON from 01 April 2020. EP (p = 0.023), including the subset of non-oncological EP (p = 0.032), were significantly less performed in the first half of 2020 as compared to the first half of 2019. In March and April 2020, we conducted significantly more EP due to motor deficits (p = 0.0267, and less), visual disturbances (p = 0.0488), and spinal instability (p = 0.0012), and significantly less EP due to radicular pain (p = 0.0489), as compared to March and April 2019. LOS ranked significantly higher in patients who received cranial or spinal EP in March and April 2020 as compared to March and April 2019 (p = 0.0497). Significant differences in outcome were not observed. Conclusion: The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic was correlated to an immediate and significant decrease in ON, and to a significant decrease in the number of EP performed. The subsequent increase in ON was delayed. Adequate measures to promote timely discharge of patients may become increasingly relevant as the pandemic proceeds. Although we observed a shift in the range of indications towards significantly more EP in patients with neurological deficiencies, care should be taken to avoid potentially deleterious delays of necessary elective treatment in future pandemic situations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Clinical Pathway for Emergency Brain Surgery during COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes

              Background One of the challenges neurosurgeons are facing in the global public health crisis caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is to balance COVID-19 screening with timely surgery. We described a clinical pathway for patients who needed emergency brain surgery and determined whether differences in the surgery preparation process caused by COVID-19 screening affected clinical outcomes. Methods During the COVID-19 period, patients in need of emergency brain surgery in our institution were managed using a novel standardized pathway designed for COVID-19 screening. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who were hospitalized through the emergency room and underwent emergency brain surgery. A total of 32 patients who underwent emergency brain surgery from February 1 to June 30, 2020 were included in the COVID-19 group, and 65 patients who underwent surgery from February 1 to June 30, 2019 were included in the pre-COVID-19 group. The baseline characteristics, disease severity indicators, time intervals of emergency processes, and clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed between the immediate surgery group and the semi-elective surgery group during the COVID-19 period. Results There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and severity indicators between the pre-COVID-19 group and COVID-19 group. The time interval to skin incision was significantly increased in the COVID-19 group (P = 0.027). However, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. In subgroup comparison, the time interval to skin incision was shorter in the immediate surgery group during the COVID-19 period compared with the pre-COVID-19 group (P = 0.040). The screening process did not significantly increase the time interval to classification and admission for immediate surgery. The time interval to surgery initiation was longer in the COVID-19 period due to the increased time interval in the semi-elective surgery group (P < 0.001). Conclusion We proposed a clinical pathway for the preoperative screening of COVID-19 in patients requiring emergency brain surgery. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The protocol we described showed acceptable results during this pandemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Neurotrauma
                Korean J Neurotrauma
                KJN
                Korean Journal of Neurotrauma
                Korean Neurotraumatology Society
                2234-8999
                2288-2243
                March 2023
                15 March 2023
                : 19
                : 1
                : 122-123
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Hyuk-Jin Oh. Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31 Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31151, Korea. schnsohj@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-0207
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-1267
                Article
                10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e10
                10083444
                02dbf58a-bb46-497d-9321-27286baf5faf
                Copyright © 2023 Korean Neurotraumatology Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 February 2023
                : 25 February 2023
                Categories
                Current Issue
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article