10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient and caregiver experience with delayed discharge from a hospital setting: A scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Delayed hospital discharge occurs when patients are medically cleared but remain hospitalized because a suitable care setting is not available. Delayed discharge typically results in reduced levels of treatment, placing patients at risk of functional decline, falls and hospital‐related adverse events. Caregivers often take on an active role in hospital to mitigate these risks.

          Objective

          This scoping review aimed to summarize the literature on patient and caregiver experiences with delayed hospital discharge.

          Search strategy

          Seven electronic databases and grey literature were searched using keywords including alternate level of care, delayed discharge, patients, caregivers and experiences.

          Inclusion criteria

          Included articles met the following criteria: (a) patient or caregiver population 18 years or older; (b) delayed discharge from a hospital setting; (c) included experiences with delayed discharge; (d) peer‐reviewed or grey literature; and (e) published between 1 January 1998 and 16 July 2018.

          Data extraction

          Data were extracted from the seven included articles using Microsoft Excel 2016 to facilitate a thorough analysis and comparison.

          Main results

          Study themes were grouped into five elements of the delayed discharge experience: (1) overall uncertainty; (2) impact of hospital staff and physical environment; (3) mental and physical deterioration; (4) lack of engagement in decision making and need for advocacy; and (5) initial disbelief sometimes followed by reluctant acceptance.

          Conclusion

          This review provides a foundation to guide future research, policies and practices to improve patient and caregiver experiences with delayed hospital discharge, including enhanced communication with patients and families and programmes to reduce deconditioning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed‐studies systematic review

          Abstract Background The impact of delayed discharge on patients, health‐care staff and hospital costs has been incompletely characterized. Aim To systematically review experiences of delay from the perspectives of patients, health professionals and hospitals, and its impact on patients’ outcomes and costs. Methods Four of the main biomedical databases were searched for the period 2000‐2016 (February). Quantitative, qualitative and health economic studies conducted in OECD countries were included. Results Thirty‐seven papers reporting data on 35 studies were identified: 10 quantitative, 8 qualitative and 19 exploring costs. Seven of ten quantitative studies were at moderate/low methodological quality; 6 qualitative studies were deemed reliable; and the 19 studies on costs were of moderate quality. Delayed discharge was associated with mortality, infections, depression, reductions in patients’ mobility and their daily activities. The qualitative studies highlighted the pressure to reduce discharge delays on staff stress and interprofessional relationships, with implications for patient care and well‐being. Extra bed‐days could account for up to 30.7% of total costs and cause cancellations of elective operations, treatment delay and repercussions for subsequent services, especially for elderly patients. Conclusions The poor quality of the majority of the research means that implications for practice should be cautiously made. However, the results suggest that the adverse effects of delayed discharge are both direct (through increased opportunities for patients to acquire avoidable ill health) and indirect, secondary to the pressures placed on staff. These findings provide impetus to take a more holistic perspective to addressing delayed discharge.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers.

            Advocates for quality and safety have called for healthcare that is patient-centred and decision-making that involves patients. The aim of the paper is to explore the barriers and facilitators to patient-centred care in the hospital discharge process. A qualitative study using purposive sampling of 192 individual interviews and 26 focus group interviews was conducted in five European Union countries with patients and/or family members, hospital physicians and nurses, and community general practitioners and nurses. A modified Grounded Theory approach was used to analyse the data. The barriers and facilitators were classified into 15 categories from which four themes emerged: (1) healthcare providers do not sufficiently prioritise discharge consultations with patients and family members due to time restraints and competing care obligations; (2) discharge communication varied from instructing patients and family members to shared decision-making; (3) patients often feel unprepared for discharge, and postdischarge care is not tailored to individual patient needs and preferences; and (4) pressure on available hospital beds and community resources affect the discharge process. Our findings suggest that involvement of patients and families in the preparations for discharge is determined by the extent to which care providers are willing and able to accommodate patients' and families' capabilities, needs and preferences. Future interventions should be directed at healthcare providers' attitudes and their organisation's leadership, with a focus on improving communication among care providers, patients and families, and between hospital and community care providers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Acute care inpatients with long-term delayed-discharge: evidence from a Canadian health region

              Background Acute hospital discharge delays are a pressing concern for many health care administrators. In Canada, a delayed discharge is defined by the alternate level of care (ALC) construct and has been the target of many provincial health care strategies. Little is known on the patient characteristics that influence acute ALC length of stay. This study examines which characteristics drive acute ALC length of stay for those awaiting nursing home admission. Methods Population-level administrative and assessment data were used to examine 17,111 acute hospital admissions designated as alternate level of care (ALC) from a large Canadian health region. Case level hospital records were linked to home care administrative and assessment records to identify and characterize those ALC patients that account for the greatest proportion of acute hospital ALC days. Results ALC patients waiting for nursing home admission accounted for 41.5% of acute hospital ALC bed days while only accounting for 8.8% of acute hospital ALC patients. Characteristics that were significantly associated with greater ALC lengths of stay were morbid obesity (27 day mean deviation, 99% CI = ±14.6), psychiatric diagnosis (13 day mean deviation, 99% CI = ±6.2), abusive behaviours (12 day mean deviation, 99% CI = ±10.7), and stroke (7 day mean deviation, 99% CI = ±5.0). Overall, persons with morbid obesity, a psychiatric diagnosis, abusive behaviours, or stroke accounted for 4.3% of all ALC patients and 23% of all acute hospital ALC days between April 1st 2009 and April 1st, 2011. ALC patients with the identified characteristics had unique clinical profiles. Conclusions A small number of patients with non-medical days waiting for nursing home admission contribute to a substantial proportion of total non-medical days in acute hospitals. Increases in nursing home capacity or changes to existing funding arrangements should target the sub-populations identified in this investigation to maximize effectiveness. Specifically, incentives should be introduced to encourage nursing homes to accept acute patients with the least prospect for community-based living, while acute patients with the greatest prospect for community-based living are discharged to transitional care or directly to community-based care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                k.kuluski@utoronto.ca
                Journal
                Health Expect
                Health Expect
                10.1111/(ISSN)1369-7625
                HEX
                Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1369-6513
                1369-7625
                17 May 2019
                October 2019
                : 22
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/hex.v22.5 )
                : 863-873
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 2 ] Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 3 ] Lunenfeld‐Tanenbaum Research Institute Sinai Health System Toronto Ontario Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kerry Kuluski, Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 4th Floor, Toronto ON M5T 3M6.

                Email: k.kuluski@ 123456utoronto.ca

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-6925
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9552-9139
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-8163
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-1417
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-6653
                Article
                HEX12916
                10.1111/hex.12916
                6803563
                31099969
                029a7891-a306-4160-8d3f-7efeffac6b6b
                © 2019 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 March 2019
                : 29 April 2019
                : 03 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 11, Words: 7824
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes for Health Research
                Award ID: 368731
                Award ID: 157054
                Funded by: Ontario Strategy for Patient‐Oriented Research (SPOR) Support Unit
                Funded by: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long‐Term Care
                Award ID: 06034
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                hex12916
                October 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.7.0 mode:remove_FC converted:21.10.2019

                Health & Social care
                burnout,caregivers,episode of care,live change events,patient care,patient discharge,patient preference,patient satisfaction,patient transfer,psychological

                Comments

                Comment on this article