8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Balancing collaborative human–robot assembly lines to optimise cycle time and ergonomic risk

      1 , 1
      International Journal of Production Research
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          null

          null (2016)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders.

            RULA (rapid upper limb assessment) is a survey method developed for use in ergonomics investigations of workplaces where work-related upper limb disorders are reported. This tool requires no special equipment in providing a quick assessment of the postures of the neck, trunk and upper limbs along with muscle function and the external loads experienced by the body. A coding system is used to generate an action list which indicates the level of intervention required to reduce the risks of injury due to physical loading on the operator. It is of particular assistance in fulfilling the assessment requirements of both the European Community Directive (90/270/EEC) on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment and the UK Guidelines on the prevention of work-related upper limb disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.

              In 1985, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) convened an ad hoc committee of experts who reviewed the current literature on lifting, recommend criteria for defining lifting capacity, and in 1991 developed a revised lifting equation. Subsequently, NIOSH developed the documentation for the equation and played a prominent role in recommending methods for interpreting the results of the equation. The 1991 equation reflects new findings and provides methods for evaluating asymmetrical lifting tasks, lifts of objects with less than optimal hand-container couplings, and also provides guidelines for a larger range of work durations and lifting frequencies than the 1981 equation. This paper provides the basis for selecting the three criteria (biomechanical, physiological, and psychophysical) that were used to define the 1991 equation, and describes the derivation of the individual components (Putz-Anderson and Waters 1991). The paper also describes the lifting index (LI), an index of relative physical stress, that can be used to identify hazardous lifting tasks. Although the 1991 equation has not been fully validated, the recommended weight limits derived from the revised equation are consistent with or lower than those generally reported in the literature. NIOSH believes that the revised 1991 lifting equation is more likely than the 1981 equation to protect most workers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Production Research
                International Journal of Production Research
                Informa UK Limited
                0020-7543
                1366-588X
                January 02 2022
                October 21 2021
                January 02 2022
                : 60
                : 1
                : 25-47
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Operations Management, Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
                Article
                10.1080/00207543.2021.1989077
                028bfc87-8df8-43fe-a781-a1955b01e0b7
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article