1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of the timing of insertion of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) copper T380A on expulsion rates

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background & objectives:

          Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is well accepted and recommended for contraception. However, anxiety at the time of delivery may restrict the acceptance of a PPIUCD for its immediate insertion. So far there is limited evidence to conclude anything concrete on the association between the expulsion rates and the timing of insertion following a vaginal delivery. Thus, this study was undertaken to compare the expulsion rates in immediate and early insertions and their safety and complications.

          Methods:

          This prospective comparative study was carried out over 17 months on women delivering vaginally in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. A copper device (CuT380A) was inserted using Kelly’s placental forceps either within 10 min of placental delivery (immediate group, n=160) or between 10 min upto 48 h postpartum (early group, n=160). Ultrasound was done before discharge from the hospital. The expulsion rates and any other complications at six-week and three-month follow up were studied. Chi-square test was used to compare the difference in expulsion rates.

          Results:

          The expulsion rate was five per cent in the immediate compared to 3.7 per cent in the early group (no significant difference). In ten cases, the device was found to be in the lower uterus upon ultrasound before discharge. These were repositioned. There was no case with perforation, irregular bleeding or infection up to the three-month follow up. Higher age, higher parity, lack of satisfaction and motivation to continue were predictors of expulsion.

          Interpretation & conclusions:

          In the present study PPIUCD was found to be safe with overall expulsion in 4.3 per cent. It was marginally, though not significantly, higher in the immediate group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review.

          Insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) at different times or by different routes during the postpartum period may increase the risk of complications. We searched Medline, Lilacs and Cochrane Collaboration databases for articles in any language, between database inception until December 2008, which compared outcomes of postpartum IUD insertion time intervals. Search terms included postpartum, puerperium, postcesarean delivery, cesarean section, IUD(s), IUCD(s), intrauterine device(s) and insertion. From 297 articles, we identified 15 for inclusion in this review: all studies examined the outcomes from copper IUD insertions within the postpartum time period compared to other time intervals or compared routes (vaginal or via hysterotomy) of postpartum insertion. No studies of levonorgestrel IUDs were identified. Immediate IUD insertion (within 10 min of placental delivery) was safe when compared with later postpartum time periods and interval insertion. Immediate postpartum IUD insertion demonstrated lower expulsion rates when compared with delayed postpartum insertion but with higher rates than interval insertion. Immediate insertion following cesarean delivery demonstrated lower expulsion rates than immediate insertion following vaginal delivery. Poor to fair quality evidence from 15 articles demonstrated no increase in risk of complications among women who had an IUD inserted during the postpartum period; however, some increase in expulsion rates occurred with delayed postpartum insertion when compared to immediate insertion and with immediate insertion when compared to interval insertion. Postplacental placements during cesarean delivery are associated with lower expulsion rates than postplacental vaginal insertions, without increasing rates of postoperative complications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception.

            Women who want to start intrauterine contraception (IUC) during the postpartum period might benefit from IUC insertion immediately after delivery. Postplacental insertion greatly reduces the risk of subsequent pregnancy and eliminates the need for a return visit to start contraception. Without the option of immediate insertion, many women may never return for services or may adopt less effective contraception.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: Complication rates across six countries

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Med Res
                Indian J Med Res
                IJMR
                Indian J Med Res
                The Indian Journal of Medical Research
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0971-5916
                0975-9174
                April 2023
                31 May 2023
                : 157
                : 4
                : 322-329
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India
                Author notes
                For correspondence: Dr Gowri Dorairajan, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2 nd Floor, Women & Child Block, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry 605 006, India e-mail: gowridorai@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                IJMR-157-322
                10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1485_19
                10438408
                37282395
                0249e973-f726-4da7-b8af-4fc3a9cc1ded
                Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Medical Research

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 28 August 2019
                Categories
                Practice: Original Article

                Medicine
                contraception,copper device,copper t 380a,expulsion rates,intrauterine device,postpartum contraception

                Comments

                Comment on this article