0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy on Cytoreductive Surgery in Gastric Cancer With Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases: The Phase III GASTRIPEC-I Trial

      research-article
      , MD, PhD, MBA 1 , , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , MD 14 , , MD 15 , , MD 1 , , MD 16 , , MD 17 , , MD 1 , , MA 1 , , MD 18 , , MD 19 , , MD 17 , , MD 20 , , Dipl-Math 21 , 22 , , MD 23 , , MD 24 , , MD 25
      Journal of Clinical Oncology
      Wolters Kluwer Health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          In patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC), chemotherapy is the treatment of choice. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are still being debated. This randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter phase III trial (EudraCT 2006-006088-22; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02158988) explored the impact on overall survival (OS) of HIPEC after CRS.

          PATIENTS AND METHODS

          Adult patients with GC and histologically proven PM were randomly assigned (1:1) to perioperative chemotherapy and CRS alone (CRS-A) or CRS plus HIPEC (CRS + H). HIPEC comprised mitomycin C 15 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 in 5 L of saline perfused for 60 minutes at 42°C. The primary end point was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), other distant metastasis-free survival (MFS), and safety. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle.

          RESULTS

          Between March 2014 and June 2018, 105 patients were randomly assigned (53 patients to CRS-A and 52 patients to CRS + H). The trial stopped prematurely because of slow recruitment. In 55 patients, treatment stopped before CRS mainly due to disease progression/death. Median OS was the same for both groups (CRS + H, 14.9 [97.2% CI, 8.7 to 17.7] months v CRS-A, 14.9 [97.2% CI, 7.0 to 19.4] months; P = .1647). The PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 7.0) in the CRS-A group and 7.1 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.5; P = .047) in the CRS + H group. The CRS + H group showed better MFS (10.2 months [95% CI, 7.7 to 14.7] v CRS-A, 9.2 months [95% CI, 6.8 to 11.5]; P = .0286). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was similar between groups (CRS-A, 38.1% v CRS + H, 43.6%; P = .79).

          CONCLUSION

          This study showed no OS difference between CRS + H and CRS-A. PFS and MFS were significantly better in the CRS + H group, which needs further exploration. HIPEC did not increase AEs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

          First-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma has a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year. We aimed to evaluate first-line programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor-based therapies in gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the first results for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial

            Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel-based triplet FLOT (fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) as a perioperative therapy for patients with locally advanced, resectable tumours.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

              We evaluated capecitabine (an oral fluoropyrimidine) and oxaliplatin (a platinum compound) as alternatives to infused fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, for untreated advanced esophagogastric cancer. In a two-by-two design, we randomly assigned 1002 patients to receive triplet therapy with epirubicin and cisplatin plus either fluorouracil (ECF) or capecitabine (ECX) or triplet therapy with epirubicin and oxaliplatin plus either fluorouracil (EOF) or capecitabine (EOX). The primary end point was noninferiority in overall survival for the triplet therapies containing capecitabine as compared with fluorouracil and for those containing oxaliplatin as compared with cisplatin. For the capecitabine-fluorouracil comparison, the hazard ratio for death in the capecitabine group was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.99); for the oxaliplatin-cisplatin comparison, the hazard ratio for the oxaliplatin group was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.10). The upper limit of the confidence intervals for both hazard ratios excluded the predefined noninferiority margin of 1.23. Median survival times in the ECF, ECX, EOF, and EOX groups were 9.9 months, 9.9 months, 9.3 months, and 11.2 months, respectively; survival rates at 1 year were 37.7%, 40.8%, 40.4%, and 46.8%, respectively. In the secondary analysis, overall survival was longer with EOX than with ECF, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.80 in the EOX group (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P=0.02). Progression-free survival and response rates did not differ significantly among the regimens. Toxic effects of capecitabine and fluorouracil were similar. As compared with cisplatin, oxaliplatin was associated with lower incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, alopecia, renal toxicity, and thromboembolism but with slightly higher incidences of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and neuropathy. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51678883 [controlled-trials.com].). Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Oncol
                J Clin Oncol
                jco
                JCO
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                10 January 2024
                31 October 2023
                31 October 2023
                : 42
                : 2
                : 146-156
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
                [ 2 ]Department of Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz Klinikum, Mainz, Germany
                [ 3 ]Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
                [ 4 ]Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [ 5 ]Emeritus Department of Surgery, Amper Kliniken AG, Dachau, Germany
                [ 6 ]Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [ 7 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Gemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie—Münster, Münster, Germany
                [ 8 ]Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
                [ 9 ]Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [ 10 ]Department of Surgery, Klinikum der Universität München—Großhadern, München, Germany
                [ 11 ]Department of Medicine II, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
                [ 12 ]Department of Surgery, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
                [ 13 ]Department of Surgery, St Georg-Krankenhaus Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [ 14 ]Department of Surgery, Bonifatius Hospital Lingen (für Düsseldorf), Lingen, Germany
                [ 15 ]Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
                [ 16 ]Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
                [ 17 ]Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
                [ 18 ]Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
                [ 19 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
                [ 20 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum der Universität München—Großhadern, München, Germany
                [ 21 ]Zentrum für Klinische Studien (ZKS) Leipzig, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [ 22 ]Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
                [ 23 ]Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Statistik und Epidemiologie (IMISE), Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
                [ 24 ]Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [ 25 ]Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                Beate Rau, MD, PhD, MBA, Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany; e-mail: beate.rau@ 123456charite.de .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-6907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-713X
                https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9967-744X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-052X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0037-8620
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3368-0703
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5474-2171
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-2584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5640-187X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6130-5874
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-3321
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6530-5855
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-9872
                Article
                JCO.22.02867 00005
                10.1200/JCO.22.02867
                10824373
                37906724
                00f8b0bf-42b6-4e58-8a3d-27b14041ca5b
                © 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 20 December 2022
                : 27 June 2023
                : 30 August 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 18, Pages: 12
                Categories
                ORIGINAL REPORTS
                Gastrointestinal Cancer
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content820

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors365