1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating how management policies affect red wolf mortality and disappearance

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , , 4 , 5 , 1
      Royal Society Open Science
      The Royal Society
      endangered species, poaching, policy signal, survival analysis, large carnivore, Canis rufus

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Poaching is the major cause of death for large carnivores in several regions, contributing to their global endangerment. The traditional hypothesis used in wildlife management (killing for tolerance) suggests reducing protections for a species will decrease poaching. However, recent studies suggest reducing protections will instead increase poaching (facilitated illegal killing) and its concealment (facilitated cryptic poaching). Here, we build survival and competing risk models for mortality and disappearances of adult collared red wolves ( Canis rufus) released in North Carolina, USA from 1987 to 2020 ( n = 526). We evaluated how changes in federal and state policies protecting red wolves influenced the hazard and incidence of mortality and disappearance. We observed substantial increases in the hazard and incidence of red wolf reported poaching, and smaller increases in disappearances, during periods of reduced federal and state protections (including liberalizing hunting of coyotes, C. latrans); white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus) and American black bear ( Ursus americanus) hunting seasons; and management phases. Observed increases in hazard (85–256%) and incidence of reported poaching (56–243%) support the ‘facilitated illegal killing' hypothesis. We suggest improving protective policies intended to conserve endangered species generally and large carnivores in particular, to mitigate environmental crimes and generally improve the protection of wild animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes.

            The conservation of large carnivores is a formidable challenge for biodiversity conservation. Using a data set on the past and current status of brown bears (Ursus arctos), Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), gray wolves (Canis lupus), and wolverines (Gulo gulo) in European countries, we show that roughly one-third of mainland Europe hosts at least one large carnivore species, with stable or increasing abundance in most cases in 21st-century records. The reasons for this overall conservation success include protective legislation, supportive public opinion, and a variety of practices making coexistence between large carnivores and people possible. The European situation reveals that large carnivores and people can share the same landscape. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks

              Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society
                2054-5703
                May 24, 2022
                May 2022
                May 24, 2022
                : 9
                : 5
                : 210400
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, , Madison, WI, USA
                [ 2 ] Project Coyote, , Larkspur, CA, USA
                [ 3 ] The Rewilding Institute, , Albuquerque, NM, USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Kennesaw State University, , Kennesaw, GA, USA
                [ 5 ] Wolf Conservation Center, , South Salem, NY, USA
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5980322.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-9128
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3052-4708
                Article
                rsos210400
                10.1098/rsos.210400
                9128856
                35620012
                00858a1d-ff1c-4876-99af-65018cf221a0
                © 2022 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : March 9, 2021
                : April 27, 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Antioch University of New England;
                Funded by: UW-Madison Vilas Lifecycle;
                Categories
                1001
                60
                69
                Ecology, Conservation and Global Change Biology
                Registered Report

                endangered species,poaching,policy signal,survival analysis,large carnivore,canis rufus

                Comments

                Comment on this article