1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A Survey of Common Practices in Infancy Research: Description of Policies, Consistency Across and Within Labs, and Suggestions for Improvements

      1 , 2 , 1
      Infancy
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          What's in a look?

          The most common behavioral technique used to study infant perception, cognition, language, and social development is some variant of looking time. Since its inception as a reliable method in the late 1950s, a tremendous increase in knowledge about infant competencies has been gained by inferences made from measures of looking time. Here we examine the logic, utility, and future prospects for further gains in our understanding of infant cognition from the use of looking time measures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Statistical Treatment of Looking-Time Data

              Looking times (LTs) are frequently measured in empirical research on infant cognition. We analyzed the statistical distribution of LTs across participants to develop recommendations for their treatment in infancy research. Our analyses focused on a common within-subject experimental design, in which longer looking to novel or unexpected stimuli is predicted. We analyzed data from 2 sources: an in-house set of LTs that included data from individual participants (47 experiments, 1,584 observations), and a representative set of published articles reporting group-level LT statistics (149 experiments from 33 articles). We established that LTs are log-normally distributed across participants, and therefore, should always be log-transformed before parametric statistical analyses. We estimated the typical size of significant effects in LT studies, which allowed us to make recommendations about setting sample sizes. We show how our estimate of the distribution of effect sizes of LT studies can be used to design experiments to be analyzed by Bayesian statistics, where the experimenter is required to determine in advance the predicted effect size rather than the sample size. We demonstrate the robustness of this method in both sets of LT experiments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Infancy
                Infancy
                Wiley
                15250008
                July 2017
                July 2017
                March 16 2017
                : 22
                : 4
                : 470-491
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology University of Washington
                [2 ]Department of Psychology The University of British Columbia
                Article
                10.1111/infa.12183
                007ce2af-9804-4057-840d-af66df565961
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article