66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Fat cells reactivate quiescent neuroblasts via TOR and glial Insulin relays in Drosophila

      research-article
      , , *
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many stem, progenitor and cancer cells undergo periods of mitotic quiescence from which they can be reactivated 1- 5 . The signals triggering entry into and exit from this reversible dormant state are not well understood. In the developing Drosophila central nervous system (CNS), multipotent self-renewing progenitors called neuroblasts 6- 9 undergo quiescence in a stereotypical spatiotemporal pattern 10 . Entry into quiescence is regulated by Hox proteins and an internal neuroblast timer 11- 13 . Exit from quiescence (reactivation) is subject to a nutritional checkpoint requiring dietary amino acids 14 . Organ co-cultures also implicate an unidentified signal from an adipose/hepatic-like tissue called fat body 14 . Here, we provide in vivo evidence that Slimfast amino-acid sensing and Target-of-Rapamycin (TOR) signalling 15 activate a fat-body derived signal (FDS) required for neuroblast reactivation. Downstream of the FDS, Insulin-like receptor (InR) signalling and the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K)/TOR network are required in neuroblasts for exit from quiescence. We demonstrate that nutritionally regulated glial cells provide the source of Insulin-like Peptides (Ilps) relevant for timely neuroblast reactivation but not for overall larval growth. Conversely, Ilps secreted into the hemolymph by median neurosecretory cells (mNSCs) systemically control organismal size 16- 18 but do not reactivate neuroblasts. Drosophila thus contains two segregated Ilp pools, one regulating proliferation within the CNS and the other controlling tissue growth systemically. Together, our findings support a model in which amino acids trigger the cell cycle re-entry of neural progenitors via a fat body→glia→neuroblasts relay. This mechanism highlights that dietary nutrients and remote organs, as well as local niches, are key regulators of transitions in stem-cell behaviour.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif.

          Engineered systems are often built of recurring circuit modules that carry out key functions. Transcription networks that regulate the responses of living cells were recently found to obey similar principles: they contain several biochemical wiring patterns, termed network motifs, which recur throughout the network. One of these motifs is the feed-forward loop (FFL). The FFL, a three-gene pattern, is composed of two input transcription factors, one of which regulates the other, both jointly regulating a target gene. The FFL has eight possible structural types, because each of the three interactions in the FFL can be activating or repressing. Here, we theoretically analyze the functions of these eight structural types. We find that four of the FFL types, termed incoherent FFLs, act as sign-sensitive accelerators: they speed up the response time of the target gene expression following stimulus steps in one direction (e.g., off to on) but not in the other direction (on to off). The other four types, coherent FFLs, act as sign-sensitive delays. We find that some FFL types appear in transcription network databases much more frequently than others. In some cases, the rare FFL types have reduced functionality (responding to only one of their two input stimuli), which may partially explain why they are selected against. Additional features, such as pulse generation and cooperativity, are discussed. This study defines the function of one of the most significant recurring circuit elements in transcription networks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila.

            Previous studies suggested that Roundabout (Robo) is a repulsive guidance receptor on growth cones that binds to an unknown midline ligand. Here we present genetic evidence that Slit is the midline Robo ligand; a companion paper presents biochemical evidence that Slit binds Robo. Slit is a large extracellular matrix protein expressed by midline glia. In slit mutants, growth cones enter the midline but never leave it; they abnormally continue to express high levels of Robo while at the midline. slit and robo display dosage-sensitive genetic interactions, indicating that they function in the same pathway. slit is also required for migration of muscle precursors away from the midline. Slit appears to function as a short-range repellent controlling axon crossing of the midline and as a long-range chemorepellent controlling mesoderm migration away from the midline.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Molecular mechanisms of metabolic regulation by insulin in Drosophila.

              The insulin signalling pathway is highly conserved from mammals to Drosophila. Insulin signalling in the fly, as in mammals, regulates a number of physiological functions, including carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, tissue growth and longevity. In the present review, I discuss the molecular mechanisms by which insulin signalling regulates metabolism in Drosophila, comparing and contrasting with the mammalian system. I discuss both the intracellular signalling network, as well as the communication between organs in the fly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                26 January 2011
                23 February 2011
                24 March 2011
                24 September 2011
                : 471
                : 7339
                : 508-512
                Affiliations
                Division of Developmental Neurobiology, Medical Research Council National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]To whom correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.P.G.: agould@ 123456nimr.mrc.ac.uk
                Article
                UKMS34135
                10.1038/nature09867
                3146047
                21346761
                0078a80a-9127-4626-b0e4-a51dea0cb49e

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council :
                Award ID: U.1175.01.004.00001(62105) || MRC_
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article