0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consumer Attitudes toward Consumption of Meat Products Containing Offal and Offal Extracts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The development of food products containing offal and offal extracts could be part of the solution to the upcoming demand for animal protein. This study aimed to determine Spanish consumers’ attitudes toward offal and the development of meat products containing offal extracts. Consumers’ perceptions were evaluated by means of focus group discussions and a survey ( N = 400) to validate the focus group results in various Spanish provinces. The theory of planned behavior was used to examine consumer attitudes. Results indicated that nutritional properties, environmental sustainability, and affordability were the main drivers, while sensory attributes, low frequency consumption, and perceived higher content of undesirable compounds were the main barriers. Three segments were identified according to their beliefs: those in favor of these products, those that were health and environmentally conscious, and those who were reluctant about them. The identification of these segments and their profiles demonstrated the necessity to focus efforts on providing reliable information on sensory and health-related issues to improve acceptability. Attitude was the most important predictor of behavioral intention regarding the global model, while the social component (subjective norm) was significant for two of the identified segments, emphasizing the relevance of the social component for acceptability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

            Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review

              The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has received considerable attention in the literature. The present study is a quantitative integration and review of that research. From a database of 185 independent studies published up to the end of 1997, the TPB accounted for 27% and 39% of the variance in behaviour and intention, respectively. The perceived behavioural control (PBC) construct accounted for significant amounts of variance in intention and behaviour, independent of theory of reasoned action variables. When behaviour measures were self-reports, the TPB accounted for 11% more of the variance in behaviour than when behaviour measures were objective or observed (R2s = .31 and .21, respectively). Attitude, subjective norm and PBC account for significantly more of the variance in individuals' desires than intentions or self-predictions, but intentions and self-predictions were better predictors of behaviour. The subjective norm construct is generally found to be a weak predictor of intentions. This is partly attributable to a combination of poor measurement and the need for expansion of the normative component. The discussion focuses on ways in which current TPB research can be taken forward in the light of the present review.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Foods
                Foods
                foods
                Foods
                MDPI
                2304-8158
                23 June 2021
                July 2021
                : 10
                : 7
                : 1454
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Food Safety and Functionality Program, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Finca Camps i Armet s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain; mar.llauger@ 123456irta.cat (M.L.); ricard.bou@ 123456irta.cat (R.B.)
                [2 ]Food Quality and Technology Program, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Finca Camps i Armet s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain; anna.claret@ 123456irta.cat (A.C.); laura.lopezm@ 123456irta.cat (L.L.-M.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lluis.guerrero@ 123456irta.cat ; Tel.: +34-972630052 (ext. 1494)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-7318
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-874X
                Article
                foods-10-01454
                10.3390/foods10071454
                8303894
                34201569
                006b91bb-0d69-4912-80bf-fa72f421fe54
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 May 2021
                : 18 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                theory of planned behavior,viscera,valorization,by-products,sustainability,consumer perception,consumer attitude

                Comments

                Comment on this article