47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 11 , 1 , All members of the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group
      Neurogastroenterology and Motility
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      anorectal function testing, anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, functional anorectal disorders, rectal sensory test

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of anorectal function testing including anorectal manometry (focused on high‐resolution manometry), the rectal sensory test, and the balloon expulsion test. Based on these measurements, a classification system for disorders of anorectal function is proposed.

          Methods

          Twenty‐nine working group members (clinicians/academics in the field of gastroenterology, coloproctology, and gastrointestinal physiology) were invited to six face‐to‐face and three remote meetings to derive consensus between 2014 and 2018.

          Key recommendations

          The IAPWG protocol for the performance of anorectal function testing recommends a standardized sequence of maneuvers to test rectoanal reflexes, anal tone and contractility, rectoanal coordination, and rectal sensation. Major findings not seen in healthy controls defined by the classification are as follows: rectoanal areflexia, anal hypotension and hypocontractility, rectal hyposensitivity, and hypersensitivity. Minor and inconclusive findings that can be present in health and require additional information prior to diagnosis include anal hypertension and dyssynergia.

          Conclusions and Inferences

          This framework introduces the IAPWG protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function based on objective physiological measurement. The use of a common language to describe results of diagnostic tests, standard operating procedures, and a consensus classification system is designed to bring much‐needed standardization to these techniques.

          Abstract

          This document summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance of anorectal function testing and introduces a consensus classification for disorders of anorectal function based on objective, physiological measurement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus

            Clinical history, questionnaire data and response to antisecretory therapy are insufficient to make a conclusive diagnosis of GERD in isolation, but are of value in determining need for further investigation. Conclusive evidence for reflux on oesophageal testing include advanced grade erosive oesophagitis (LA grades C and D), long-segment Barrett’s mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal oesophageal acid exposure time (AET) >6% on ambulatory pH or pH-impedance monitoring. A normal endoscopy does not exclude GERD, but provides supportive evidence refuting GERD in conjunction with distal AET <4% and <40 reflux episodes on pH-impedance monitoring off proton pump inhibitors. Reflux-symptom association on ambulatory reflux monitoring provides supportive evidence for reflux triggered symptoms, and may predict a better treatment outcome when present. When endoscopy and pH or pH-impedance monitoring are inconclusive, adjunctive evidence from biopsy findings (histopathology scores, dilated intercellular spaces), motor evaluation (hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter, hiatus hernia and oesophageal body hypomotility on high-resolution manometry) and novel impedance metrics (baseline impedance, postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index) can add confidence for a GERD diagnosis; however, diagnosis cannot be based on these findings alone. An assessment of anatomy, motor function, reflux burden and symptomatic phenotype will therefore help direct management. Future GERD management strategies should focus on defining individual patient phenotypes based on the level of refluxate exposure, mechanism of reflux, efficacy of clearance, underlying anatomy of the oesophagogastric junction and psychometrics defining symptomatic presentations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

              The Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                e.v.carrington@qmul.ac.uk
                Journal
                Neurogastroenterol Motil
                Neurogastroenterol. Motil
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2982
                NMO
                Neurogastroenterology and Motility
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1350-1925
                1365-2982
                12 August 2019
                January 2020
                : 32
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/nmo.v32.1 )
                : e13679
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Queen Mary University of London London UK
                [ 2 ] University of Zürich Zürich Switzerland
                [ 3 ] Medical College of Georgia Augusta Georgia USA
                [ 4 ] University Aldo Moro of Bari Bari Italy
                [ 5 ] Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
                [ 6 ] Monash University and Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 7 ] Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA
                [ 8 ] AOUI Verona Verona Italy
                [ 9 ] Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia
                [ 10 ] University College London London UK
                [ 11 ] National University Hospital Singapore Singapore City Singapore
                [ 12 ] UMC Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 13 ] Asan Medical Center Seoul Korea
                [ 14 ] Harvard Medical School St, Boston Massachusetts USA
                [ 15 ] University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
                [ 16 ] University of California Berkeley California USA
                [ 17 ] Université de Lyon et Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon France
                [ 18 ] University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
                [ 19 ] Krankenhaus Vilsbiburg and Technical University Munich Munich Germany
                [ 20 ] University of Veracruz Veracruz Mexico
                [ 21 ] University of Colorado Denver Colorado USA
                [ 22 ] St Mark’s Hospital and Imperial College London London UK
                [ 23 ] AP‐HM ‐ Aix‐Marseille University Marseille France
                [ 24 ] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Emma V Carrington, The Wingate Institute, 26 Ashfield Street, London, UK.

                Email: e.v.carrington@ 123456qmul.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9467-9223
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-0921
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-5584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-8452
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8980-2752
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-0390
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3771-3691
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-1188
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-9697
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-7111
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-7602
                Article
                NMO13679
                10.1111/nmo.13679
                6923590
                31407463
                006a645a-8ec2-499a-8bb2-d54254901351
                © 2019 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 February 2019
                : 25 June 2019
                : 02 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 7865
                Funding
                Funded by: United European Gastroenterology (UEG)
                Funded by: Sandhill Scientific/Diversatek
                Funded by: Medical Measurement Systems/Laborie
                Funded by: NIH, NIDDK , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: RO1 DK78924
                Award ID: U-01DK109191
                Award ID: 5R21DK104127-02
                Award ID: U01DK115575
                Funded by: Biomedical Research Centre UCL
                Funded by: Newton Foundation‐CONACYT
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:06.02.2020

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                anorectal function testing,anorectal manometry,balloon expulsion test,functional anorectal disorders,rectal sensory test

                Comments

                Comment on this article