7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This pictorial review aims to provide the radiologist with simple and systematic guidelines for the radiographic evaluation of a hip prosthesis. Currently, there is a plethora of commercially available arthroplasties, making postoperative analysis not always straightforward. Knowledge of the different types of hip arthroplasty and fixating techniques is a prerequisite for correct imaging interpretation. After identification of the type of arthroplasty, meticulous and systematic analysis of the following parameters on an anteroposterior standing pelvic radiograph should be undertaken: leg length, vertical and horizontal centre of rotation, lateral acetabular inclination, and femoral stem positioning. Additional orthogonal views may be useful to evaluate acetabular anteversion. Complications can be classified in three major groups: periprosthetic lucencies, sclerosis or bone proliferation, and component failure or fracture.

          Teaching Points

          To give an overview of the different types of currently used hip arthroplasties.

          To provide a simple framework for a systematic approach to postoperative radiographs.

          To discuss radiographic findings of the most common complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

          Certain roentgenographic signs have value in predicting the fixation of a cementless femoral component to bone by osseointegration. Other signs have value in predicting the gross stability of a cementless femoral component. The authors have determined the specificity and sensitivity of the signs for osseointegration in cases in which the histologic fixation has been confirmed after implant removal. The authors have also determined the specificity and sensitivity of the signs for gross implant stability in cases in which the stability has been confirmed at reoperation. Statistical methods were used to determine a numeric value for each of these roentgenographic signs, and these values were combined into a score. The score was divided into fixation by osseointegration and mechanical implant stability. The two scores were then combined into an overall score. When signs of osseointegration were present, the implant was always stable, and the overall scores were the highest. When signs of osseointegration were absent, the mechanical stability varied, and the scores were lower. A neutral or slightly negative score correlated with failed osseointegration but secondary successful implant stabilization. A very low negative score correlated with gross implant instability. To confirm the validity of the scoring system, the two-year postoperative score was determined for 1005 cases in which the clinical outcome was known. A strong correlation between the presence of symptoms and a low score confirmed the value of the scoring system for diagnosing implant loosening as the cause of symptoms. As a second test, the two-year and five-year postoperative results were compared in the same patients. A high two-year score correlated with durable implant stability through five years. A low two-year score correlated with a higher incidence of late symptomatic loosening.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

            The frequency of radiological demarcation of the cement-bone junction in the acetabulum after total hip replacement has been examined in 141 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties followed for an average of 10.1 years. Sixty-nine per cent showed demarcation of various degrees and 9.2 per cent of the series showed evidence of progressive migration of the socket. The vast majority of cases with demarcation were symptomless. In most cases where demarcation was accompanied by migration the operation notes suggested a technical explanation and in three cases low-grade sepsis was responsible. The fact that nearly 30 per cent of cases showed no demarcation even after 10 years supports the idea that there is no fundamental defect in the principle of employing cement in the acetabulum. Better surgical technique may increase the number of cases showing no demarcation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

              In view of the increasing incidence of stem-type femoral component loosening, a detailed retrospective radiographic zonal analysis of 389 total hip replacements indicated a 19.5% incidence (76 hips) of radiological evidences of mechanical looseness, i.e., fractured acrylic cement and/or a radiolucent gap at the stem-cement or cement-bone interfaces. Detailed serial radiographic examination demonstrated progressive loosening in 56 of the 76 hips and these were categorized into mechanical modes of failure. The 4 modes of failure characterizing stem-type component progressive loosening mechanisms consisted of stem pistoning within the acrylic (3.3%), cement-embedded stem pistoning with the femur (5.1%), medial midstem pivot (2.5%), calcar pivot (0.7%) and bending (fatigue) cantilever (3.3%).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +32 16 343660 , jan.1.vanrusselt@uzleuven.be
                Journal
                Insights Imaging
                Insights Imaging
                Insights into Imaging
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1869-4101
                20 October 2015
                20 October 2015
                December 2015
                : 6
                : 6
                : 591-600
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University Hospital Leuven, Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Radiology, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Radiology, AZ St-Maarten Duffel/Mechelen, Rooienberg 25, 2570 Duffel, Belgium
                Article
                438
                10.1007/s13244-015-0438-5
                4656234
                26487647
                00540ca3-e565-4872-b68c-0fcd33aedfe6
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 1 May 2015
                : 18 September 2015
                : 28 September 2015
                Categories
                Pictorial Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Radiology & Imaging
                hip,arthroplasty,postoperative complications,imaging,radiography
                Radiology & Imaging
                hip, arthroplasty, postoperative complications, imaging, radiography

                Comments

                Comment on this article