10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Emotion modulates the effects of endogenous attention on retinotopic visual processing

      , , , , , ,
      NeuroImage
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A fundamental challenge for organisms is how to focus on perceptual information relevant to current goals while remaining able to respond to goal-irrelevant stimuli that signal potential threat. Here, we studied how visual threat signals influence the effects of goal-directed spatial attention on the retinotopic distribution of processing resources in early visual cortex. We used a combined blocked and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm with target displays comprising diagonal pairs of intact and scrambled faces presented simultaneously in the four visual field quadrants. Faces were male or female and had fearful or neutral emotional expressions. Participants attended covertly to a pair of two diagonally opposite stimuli and performed a gender-discrimination task on the attended intact face. In contrast to the fusiform face area, where attention and fearful emotional expression had additive effects, neural responses to attended and unattended fearful faces were indistinguishable in early retinotopic visual areas: When attended, fearful face expression did not further enhance responses, whereas when unattended, fearful expression increased responses to the level of attended face stimuli. Remarkably, the presence of fearful stimuli augmented the enhancing effect of attention on retinotopic responses to neutral faces in remote visual field locations. We conclude that this redistribution of neural activity in retinotopic visual cortex may serve the purpose of allocating processing resources to task-irrelevant threat-signaling stimuli while at the same time increasing resources for task-relevant stimuli as required for the maintenance of goal-directed behavior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

          We review evidence for partially segregated networks of brain areas that carry out different attentional functions. One system, which includes parts of the intraparietal cortex and superior frontal cortex, is involved in preparing and applying goal-directed (top-down) selection for stimuli and responses. This system is also modulated by the detection of stimuli. The other system, which includes the temporoparietal cortex and inferior frontal cortex, and is largely lateralized to the right hemisphere, is not involved in top-down selection. Instead, this system is specialized for the detection of behaviourally relevant stimuli, particularly when they are salient or unexpected. This ventral frontoparietal network works as a 'circuit breaker' for the dorsal system, directing attention to salient events. Both attentional systems interact during normal vision, and both are disrupted in unilateral spatial neglect.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

              Faces are among the most important visual stimuli we perceive, informing us not only about a person's identity, but also about their mood, sex, age and direction of gaze. The ability to extract this information within a fraction of a second of viewing a face is important for normal social interactions and has probably played a critical role in the survival of our primate ancestors. Considerable evidence from behavioural, neuropsychological and neurophysiological investigations supports the hypothesis that humans have specialized cognitive and neural mechanisms dedicated to the perception of faces (the face-specificity hypothesis). Here, we review the literature on a region of the human brain that appears to play a key role in face perception, known as the fusiform face area (FFA). Section 1 outlines the theoretical background for much of this work. The face-specificity hypothesis falls squarely on one side of a longstanding debate in the fields of cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience concerning the extent to which the mind/brain is composed of: (i) special-purpose ('domain-specific') mechanisms, each dedicated to processing a specific kind of information (e.g. faces, according to the face-specificity hypothesis), versus (ii) general-purpose ('domain-general') mechanisms, each capable of operating on any kind of information. Face perception has long served both as one of the prime candidates of a domain-specific process and as a key target for attack by proponents of domain-general theories of brain and mind. Section 2 briefly reviews the prior literature on face perception from behaviour and neurophysiology. This work supports the face-specificity hypothesis and argues against its domain-general alternatives (the individuation hypothesis, the expertise hypothesis and others). Section 3 outlines the more recent evidence on this debate from brain imaging, focusing particularly on the FFA. We review the evidence that the FFA is selectively engaged in face perception, by addressing (and rebutting) five of the most widely discussed alternatives to this hypothesis. In section 4, we consider recent findings that are beginning to provide clues into the computations conducted in the FFA and the nature of the representations the FFA extracts from faces. We argue that the FFA is engaged both in detecting faces and in extracting the necessary perceptual information to recognize them, and that the properties of the FFA mirror previously identified behavioural signatures of face-specific processing (e.g. the face-inversion effect). Section 5 asks how the computations and representations in the FFA differ from those occurring in other nearby regions of cortex that respond strongly to faces and objects. The evidence indicates clear functional dissociations between these regions, demonstrating that the FFA shows not only functional specificity but also area specificity. We end by speculating in section 6 on some of the broader questions raised by current research on the FFA, including the developmental origins of this region and the question of whether faces are unique versus whether similarly specialized mechanisms also exist for other domains of high-level perception and cognition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NeuroImage
                NeuroImage
                Elsevier BV
                10538119
                August 2011
                August 2011
                : 57
                : 4
                : 1542-1551
                Article
                10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.072
                66f6fcee-7dff-48a2-959e-de362661c902
                © 2011

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article