37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cross-recurrence quantification analysis of categorical and continuous time series: an R package

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper describes the R package crqa to perform cross-recurrence quantification analysis of two time series of either a categorical or continuous nature. Streams of behavioral information, from eye movements to linguistic elements, unfold over time. When two people interact, such as in conversation, they often adapt to each other, leading these behavioral levels to exhibit recurrent states. In dialog, for example, interlocutors adapt to each other by exchanging interactive cues: smiles, nods, gestures, choice of words, and so on. In order for us to capture closely the goings-on of dynamic interaction, and uncover the extent of coupling between two individuals, we need to quantify how much recurrence is taking place at these levels. Methods available in crqa would allow researchers in cognitive science to pose such questions as how much are two people recurrent at some level of analysis, what is the characteristic lag time for one person to maximally match another, or whether one person is leading another. First, we set the theoretical ground to understand the difference between “correlation” and “co-visitation” when comparing two time series, using an aggregative or cross-recurrence approach. Then, we describe more formally the principles of cross-recurrence, and show with the current package how to carry out analyses applying them. We end the paper by comparing computational efficiency, and results’ consistency, of crqa R package, with the benchmark MATLAB toolbox crptoolbox (Marwan, 2013). We show perfect comparability between the two libraries on both levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Observing interaction

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Sequential Analysis and Observational Methods for the Behavioral Sciences

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination.

              Previous research has demonstrated that people's movements can become unintentionally coordinated during interpersonal interaction. The current study sought to uncover the degree to which visual and verbal (conversation) interaction constrains and organizes the rhythmic limb movements of coactors. Two experiments were conducted in which pairs of participants completed an interpersonal puzzle task while swinging handheld pendulums with instructions that minimized intentional coordination but facilitated either visual or verbal interaction. Cross-spectral analysis revealed a higher degree of coordination for conditions in which the pairs were visually coupled. In contrast, verbal interaction alone was not found to provide a sufficient medium for unintentional coordination to occur, nor did it enhance the unintentional coordination that emerged during visual interaction. The results raise questions concerning differences between visual and verbal informational linkages during interaction and how these differences may affect interpersonal movement production and its coordination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                27 June 2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 510
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa, Portugal
                [2] 2Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California Merced, CA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Holmes Finch, Ball State University, USA

                Reviewed by: Jee-Seon Kim, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; Noel Nguyen, Université d’Aix-Marseille, France

                *Correspondence: Moreno I. Coco, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa 1649-013, Portugal e-mail: micoco@ 123456fp.ul.pt

                This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00510
                4073592
                0f752200-664a-42bb-b169-120ed4d37a1a
                Copyright © 2014 Coco and Dale.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 October 2013
                : 09 May 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 39, Pages: 14, Words: 10071
                Categories
                Psychology
                Methods Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                cross-recurrence analysis,cognitive dynamics,methodology comparison,behavioral data,r library

                Comments

                Comment on this article