2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fear conditioning and extinction induce opposing changes in dendritic spine remodeling and somatic activity of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the mouse motor cortex.

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multiple brain regions including the amygdala and prefrontal cortex are crucial for modulating fear conditioning and extinction. The primary motor cortex is known to participate in the planning, control, and execution of voluntary movements. Whether and how the primary motor cortex is involved in modulating freezing responses related to fear conditioning and extinction remains unclear. Here we show that inactivation of the mouse primary motor cortex impairs both the acquisition and extinction of freezing responses induced by auditory-cued fear conditioning. Fear conditioning significantly increases the elimination of dendritic spines on apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the motor cortex. These eliminated spines are further apart from each other than expected from random distribution along dendrites. On the other hand, fear extinction causes the formation of new spines that are located near the site of spines eliminated previously after fear conditioning. We further show that fear conditioning decreases and fear extinction increases somatic activities of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the motor cortex respectively. Taken together, these findings indicate fear conditioning and extinction induce opposing changes in synaptic connections and somatic activities of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the primary motor cortex, a cortical region important for the acquisition and extinction of auditory-cued conditioned freezing responses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval.

          Emotional learning is necessary for individuals to survive and prosper. Once acquired, however, emotional associations are not always expressed. Indeed, the regulation of emotional expression under varying environmental conditions is essential for mental health. The simplest form of emotional regulation is extinction, in which conditioned responding to a stimulus decreases when the reinforcer is omitted. Two decades of research on the neural mechanisms of fear conditioning have laid the groundwork for understanding extinction. In this review, we summarize recent work on the neural mechanisms of extinction learning. Like other forms of learning, extinction occurs in three phases: acquisition, consolidation, and retrieval, each of which depends on specific structures (amygdala, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus) and molecular mechanisms (receptors and signaling pathways). Pharmacological methods to facilitate consolidation and retrieval of extinction, for both aversive and appetitive conditioning, are setting the stage for novel treatments for anxiety disorders and addictions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dissociable roles of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices, ventral hippocampus, and basolateral amygdala in the expression and extinction of conditioned fear.

            Current models of conditioned fear expression and extinction involve the basolateral amygdala (BLA), ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and the hippocampus (HPC). There is some disagreement with respect to the specific roles of these structures, perhaps due to subregional differences within each area. For example, growing evidence suggests that infralimbic (IL) and prelimbic (PL) subregions of vmPFC have opposite influences on fear expression. Moreover, it is the ventral HPC (vHPC), rather than the dorsal HPC, that projects to vmPFC and BLA. To help determine regional specificity, we used small doses of the GABA(A) agonist muscimol to selectively inactivate IL, PL, BLA, or vHPC in an auditory fear conditioning and extinction paradigm. Infusions were performed prior to extinction training, allowing us to assess the effects on both fear expression and subsequent extinction memory. Inactivation of IL had no effect on fear expression, but impaired the within-session acquisition of extinction as well as extinction memory. In contrast, inactivation of PL impaired fear expression, but had no effect on extinction memory. Inactivation of the BLA or vHPC impaired both fear expression and extinction memory. Post-extinction inactivations had no effect in any structure. We suggest a model in which amygdala-dependent fear expression is modulated by inputs from PL and vHPC, whereas extinction memory requires extinction-induced plasticity in IL, BLA, and/or vHPC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective.

              Our ability to move is central to everyday life. Investigating the neural control of movement in general, and the cortical control of volitional arm movements in particular, has been a major research focus in recent decades. Studies have involved primarily either attempts to account for single-neuron responses in terms of tuning for movement parameters or attempts to decode movement parameters from populations of tuned neurons. Even though this focus on encoding and decoding has led to many seminal advances, it has not produced an agreed-upon conceptual framework. Interest in understanding the underlying neural dynamics has recently increased, leading to questions such as how does the current population response determine the future population response, and to what purpose? We review how a dynamical systems perspective may help us understand why neural activity evolves the way it does, how neural activity relates to movement parameters, and how a unified conceptual framework may result.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Scientific reports
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                2045-2322
                2045-2322
                March 15 2019
                : 9
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] State Key Laboratory of Chemical Oncogenomics, Key Laboratory of Chemical Genomics, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
                [2 ] Skirball Institute, Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Anesthesiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
                [3 ] Skirball Institute, Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Anesthesiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA. gan@saturn.med.nyu.edu.
                Article
                10.1038/s41598-019-40549-y
                10.1038/s41598-019-40549-y
                6420657
                30874589
                854e6e50-bb14-4c5b-85df-df1cfccfb2c6
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article