36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis

      Psychological Medicine
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ROC Analysis Applied to the Evaluation of Medical Imaging Techniques

            JOHN SWETS (1979)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of diagnostic technologies.

              A general protocol for rigorous evaluation of diagnostic systems in medicine was applied successfully in a comparative study of two radiologic techniques. Accuracies of computed tomography and radionuclide scanning in detecting, localizing, and diagnosing brain lesions were assessed with a sample of patients in whom tumor had been suspected. The principal means of analysis was the "relative operating characteristic," which is unique in providing a measure of accuracy that is largely independent of decision biases. Computed tomography was found to be substantially more accurate than radionuclide scanning.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                10.1017/S0033291700031500

                Comments

                Comment on this article