1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The status of intimate partner violence against pregnant women in contemporary China: a scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This review explored the status of publications on intimate partner violence (IPV) against pregnant women in contemporary China.

          Methods

          The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched using the terms “IPV,” “pregnant woman,” “Chinese,” and synonyms in English, along with related keywords for Chinese publications. All literature pertaining to IPV during pregnancy, conducted in China, and published between 1987 and September 2023 was included.

          Results

          A total of 37 articles from 30 studies were selected. The prevalence of IPV during pregnancy ranged from 2.5% to 31.3%, with psychological violence being the most common form. Frequently identified risk factors included unintended pregnancy, poor family economic conditions, male partners engaging in health risk behaviors, poor employment status of women or their partners, low education levels among women, physical or mental health issues, strained couple relationships, and in-law conflicts. IPV during pregnancy primarily led to mental health problems for the victims and could result in adverse obstetric outcomes, as well as negative effects on the temperament and development of the offspring. Victims in China demonstrated a low willingness to seek help from professionals. Furthermore, relevant research in mainland China is scarce, with a limited number of studies and non-standardized research methodologies.

          Conclusion

          Future research should investigate IPV in pregnancy from various perspectives, identify factors unique to IPV during pregnancy, and focus on high-risk groups. Considering the conditions in China, there is a pressing need to increase public awareness of IPV and to investigate interventions aimed at addressing this issue.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

            The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Womens Health Nurs
                Womens Health Nurs
                WHN
                Women's Health Nursing
                Korean Society of Women Health Nursing
                3022-7666
                3022-8247
                31 March 2024
                29 March 2024
                : 30
                : 1
                : 41-55
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) Four Project, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Hae Won Kim College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) Four Project, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea Tel: +82-2-740-8820 E-mail: haewon@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1823-8488
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-1575
                Article
                whn-2024-03-16
                10.4069/whn.2024.03.16
                11073557
                38650326
                d2836161-722d-4a35-aef3-63c9690c98a2
                © 2024 Korean Society of Women Health Nursing

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 December 2023
                : 15 March 2024
                : 16 March 2024
                Categories
                Review Article

                china,domestic violence,hong kong,intimate partner violence,pregnancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article