3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on stress and sleep in emergency room professionals

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims and Objectives

          To analyze stress levels, sleep quality, sleepiness and chronotypes on emergency room (ER) professionals before and during the COVID‐19.

          Background

          ER healthcare professionals are exposed to high stress levels, and they often present with poor sleep quality.

          Design

          Observational study conducted into two different phases (before the COVID‐19 and during the first wave of the COVID‐19).

          Method

          Physicians, nurses and nursing assistants working in the ER were included. Stress, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and chronotypes were assessed by the Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale (SFMS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the Horne and Österberg Morningness‐Eveningness questionnaire, respectively. The first phase of the study was performed between December 2019 and February 2020, and the second between April and June 2020. The STROBE checklist was used to report the present study.

          Results

          In total, 189 ER professionals in the pre‐COVID‐19 phase and 171 (of the initial 189) during COVID‐19 were included. The proportion of workers with a morning circadian rhythm increased during the COVID‐19, and stress levels were significantly higher during COVID‐19 compared to the previous phase (38.34 ± 10.74 vs. 49.97 ± 15.81). ER professionals with poor sleep quality presented higher stress in the pre‐COVID‐19 phase (40.60 ± 10.71 vs. 32.22 ± 8.19) and during COVID‐19 (55.27 ± 15.75 vs. 39.66 ± 9.75). Similarly, workers with excessive sleepiness had higher stress in the pre‐COVID‐19 phase (42.06 ± 10.95 vs. 36.64 ± 10.24) and during COVID‐19 (54.67 ± 18.10 vs. 48.44 ± 14.75). Positive associations were also found between the SFMS and the PSQI, as well as with the ESS in both phases of the study.

          Conclusions

          Emergency room professionals had increased stress levels during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Stress was particularly higher in those with poor sleep quality or with excessive daytime sleepiness.

          Relevance to Clinical Practice

          These results should aim to impulse the implementation of measures to improve the working conditions of ER professionals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

            Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

              Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Wiley
                0962-1067
                1365-2702
                August 2023
                May 03 2023
                August 2023
                : 32
                : 15-16
                : 5037-5045
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Emergency Department Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca Murcia Spain
                [2 ] Catholic University of Murcia Murcia Spain
                [3 ] University of Almería Almería Spain
                [4 ] Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB‐Arrixaca), CIBERCV Murcia Spain
                Article
                10.1111/jocn.16738
                228ad3f1-6593-40d2-9bf4-7b978a2cc73a
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article