58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Processed food revolution in African food systems and the Double Burden of Malnutrition

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          African consumers have purchased increasing amounts of processed food over the past 50 years. The opportunity cost of time of women and men has increased as more of them work outside the home, driving them to buy processed food and food prepared away from home to save arduous home-processing and preparation labor. In the past several decades, this trend has accelerated with a surge on the supply side of the processing sector and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and large private companies making massive aggregate investments. Packaged, industrialized, ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a growing proportion of the processed food consumed. Also, in the past several decades, overweight and obesity have joined the long-standing high levels of stunting and wasting among children and extreme thinness among women of childbearing age. Together these phenomena have formed a double burden of malnutrition (DBM). The DBM has emerged as an important health problem in sub-Saharan Africa. The rise of the DBM and the increase in ultra-processed food consumption are linked. Policy makers face a dilemma. On the one hand, purchases of processed food are driven by long-term factors, such as urbanization, increased income, and employment changes, and thus policy cannot change the pursuit of convenience and labor-saving food. Moreover, much processed food, like packaged milk, is a boon to nutrition, and the processed food system is a major source of jobs for women. On the other hand, the portion (some 10–30%) of processed food that is ultra-processed is a public health challenge, and policy must address its detrimental effects on disease burden. The global experience suggests that double duty actions are most important as are selected policies focused on healthy weaning foods for addressing stunting and taxes on SSBs, nutrition labeling, and other measures can steer consumers away from unhealthy ultra-processed foods to addressing obesity and possibly child nutrition and stunting. We recommend that African governments consider these policy options, but note that the current extreme fragmentation of the processing sector, consisting of vast numbers of informal SMEs in sub-Saharan Africa, and the limited administrative/implementation capacity of many African governments require pursuing this path only gradually.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101596689
          40840
          Glob Food Sec
          Glob Food Sec
          Global food security
          2211-9124
          7 March 2021
          2 December 2020
          March 2021
          15 April 2021
          : 28
          : 100466
          Affiliations
          [a ]Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
          [b ]Nitze School of Advanced International Studies and the Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
          [c ]International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005, USA
          [d ]Nutrition and Food Systems Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, USA
          [e ]Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author. Carolina Population Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 123 W. Franklin St. Carolina Square Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516-3997, USA. popkin@ 123456unc.edu (B.M. Popkin).
          Article
          PMC8049356 PMC8049356 8049356 nihpa1675287
          10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100466
          8049356
          33868911
          4c5a8a16-f0ca-42ba-9639-10ac1cc7cb3f
          History
          Categories
          Article

          food processing,ultra-processed food,obesity,stunting,double burden of malnutrition,food system,small and medium enterprises,food away from home,food consumption,double duty actions,weaning foods,Africa

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content56

          Cited by81