ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Researchers

Search
Advanced search

39

views

    

0

recommends

4

shares

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.

Author(s): Holger Schünemann, Andrew D Oxman, Jan Brozek, Paul Glasziou, Roman Jaeschke, Gunn E. Vist, John Williams, Regina Kunz, Jonathan Craig, Victor Montori, Patrick NM Bossuyt, Gordon Guyatt

Publication date: 2008-05-17

Journal: BMJ : British Medical Journal

Keywords: Bias (Epidemiology), Diagnostic Tests, Routine, standards, Evidence-Based Medicine, Great Britain, Health Planning Guidelines, Judgment, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Practice Guidelines as Topic, Quality of Health Care, Research Design

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PMC

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

PubMed ID:: 18483053

PMC ID:: 2386626

DOI:: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE

ScienceOpen disciplines: Chemistry

Keywords: Bias (Epidemiology),Diagnostic Tests, Routine,standards,Evidence-Based Medicine,Great Britain,Health Planning Guidelines,Judgment,Outcome Assessment (Health Care),Practice Guidelines as Topic,Quality of Health Care,Research Design

Data availability:

ScienceOpen disciplines: Chemistry

Keywords: Bias (Epidemiology), Diagnostic Tests, Routine, standards, Evidence-Based Medicine, Great Britain, Health Planning Guidelines, Judgment, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Practice Guidelines as Topic, Quality of Health Care, Research Design

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Similar content 987

See all similar

Cited by 419

See all cited by

- Version 1
- Version 1