56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epidemiology of status epilepticus in adults: A population-based study on incidence, causes, and outcomes

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary Objective In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) proposed a new definition of status epilepticus (SE): 5 minutes of ongoing seizure activity to diagnose convulsive SE (CSE, ie, bilateral tonic–clonic SE) and 10 minutes for focal SE and absence SE, rather than the earlier criterion of 30 minutes. Based on semiology, several types of SE with prominent motor phenomena at any time (including CSE) were distinguished from those without (ie, nonconvulsive SE, NCSE). We present the first population‐based incidence study applying the new 2015 ILAE definition and classification of SE and report the impact of the evolution of semiology and level of consciousness (LOC) on outcome. Methods We conducted a retrospective population‐based incidence study of all adult patients with SE residing in the city of Salzburg between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients with hypoxic encephalopathy were excluded. SE was defined and classified according to the ILAE 2015. Results We identified 221 patients with a median age of 69 years (range 20‐99 years). The age‐ and sex‐adjusted incidence of a first episode of SE, NCSE, and SE with prominent motor phenomena (including CSE) was 36.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.2‐48.5), 12.1 (95% CI 6.8‐20.0), and 24.0 (95% CI 16.0‐34.5; including CSE 15.8 [95% CI 9.4‐24.8]) per 100 000 adults per year, respectively. None of the patients whose SE ended with or consisted of only bilateral tonic–clonic activity died. In all other clinical presentations, case fatality was lower in awake patients (8.2%) compared with patients with impaired consciousness (33%). Significance This first population‐based study using the ILAE 2015 definition and classification of SE found an increase of incidence of 10% compared to previous definitions. We also provide epidemiologic evidence that different patterns of status evolution and LOCs have strong prognostic implications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A prospective, population-based epidemiologic study of status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia.

            This report presents the initial analysis of a prospective, population-based study of status epilepticus (SE) in the city of Richmond, Virginia. The incidence of SE was 41 patients per year per 100,000 population. The frequency of total SE episodes was 50 per year per 100,000 population. The mortality rate for the population was 22%, 3% for children and 26% for adults. Evaluation of the seizure types for adult and pediatric patients demonstrated that both partial and generalized SE occur with a high frequency in these populations. Based on the incidence of SE actually determined in Richmond, Virginia, we project 126,000 to 195,000 SE events with 22,200 to 42,000 deaths per year in the United States. The majority of SE patients had no history of epilepsy. These results indicate that SE is a common neurologic emergency.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus.

              It is uncertain whether the administration of benzodiazepines by paramedics is an effective and safe treatment for out-of-hospital status epilepticus. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate intravenous benzodiazepines administered by paramedics for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus. Adults with prolonged (lasting five minutes or more) or repetitive generalized convulsive seizures received intravenous diazepam (5 mg), lorazepam (2 mg), or placebo. An identical second injection was given if needed. Of the 205 patients enrolled, 66 received lorazepam, 68 received diazepam, and 71 received placebo. Status epilepticus had been terminated on arrival at the emergency department in more patients treated with lorazepam (59.1 percent) or diazepam (42.6 percent) than patients given placebo (21.1 percent) (P=0.001). After adjustment for covariates, the odds ratio for termination of status epilepticus by the time of arrival in the lorazepam group as compared with the placebo group was 4.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 13.0). The odds ratio was 1.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 4.4) in the lorazepam group as compared with the diazepam group and 2.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 5.9) in the diazepam group as compared with the placebo group. The rates of respiratory or circulatory complications (indicated by bag valve-mask ventilation or an attempt at intubation, hypotension, or cardiac dysrhythmia) after the study treatment was administered were 10.6 percent for the lorazepam group, 10.3 percent for the diazepam group, and 22.5 percent for the placebo group (P=0.08). Benzodiazepines are safe and effective when administered by paramedics for out-of-hospital status epilepticus in adults. Lorazepam is likely to be a better therapy than diazepam.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Epilepsia
                Epilepsia
                Wiley
                00139580
                January 2019
                January 2019
                November 26 2018
                : 60
                : 1
                : 53-62
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center; Paracelsus Medical University; Salzburg Austria
                [2 ]Center for Neuroscience; Christian Doppler Medical Center; Salzburg Austria
                [3 ]Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment; UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology; Hall in Tirol Austria
                [4 ]Unit of Neurology; OCSAE Hospital; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria; Modena Italy
                [5 ]Department of Mathematics; Paris Lodron University; Salzburg Austria
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Science; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena Italy
                [7 ]Center for Health Decision Science; Department of Health Policy and Management; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Boston Massachusetts
                [8 ]Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology; Harvard Medical School; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
                Article
                10.1111/epi.14607
                b1c73bf6-de41-4657-853f-7b024be9f19d
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article