Estudo exploratório de custos e conseqüências do pré-natal no Programa Saúde da Família

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

OBJETIVO: Avaliar custos e conseqüências da assistência pré-natal na morbimortalidade perinatal. MÉTODOS: Estudo avaliativo com dois tipos de análise - de implantação e de eficiência, realizado em 11 Unidades de Saúde da Família do Recife, PE, em 2006. Os custos foram apurados pela técnica activity-based costing e a razão de custo-efetividade foi calculada para cada conseqüência. As fontes de dados foram sistemas de informação do Ministério da Saúde e planilhas de custos da Secretaria de Saúde do Recife e do Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira. As unidades de saúde com pré-natal implantado ou parcial foram comparadas quanto ao seu custo-efetividade e resultados perinatais. RESULTADOS: Em 64% das unidades, o pré-natal estava implantado com custo médio total de R$39.226,88 e variação de R$ 3.841,87 a R$8.765,02 por Unidade de Saúde. Nas unidades parcialmente implantadas (36%), o custo médio total foi de R$ 30.092,61 (R$4.272,12 a R$ 11.774,68). O custo médio por gestante foi de R$196,13 com pré-natal implantado e R$ 150,46 no parcial. Encontrou-se maior proporção de baixo peso ao nascer, sífilis congênita, óbitos perinatais e fetais no grupo parcialmente implantado. CONCLUSÕES: Pré-natal é custo-efetivo para várias conseqüências estudadas. Os efeitos adversos medidos pelos indicadores de saúde foram menores nas unidades com pré-natal implantado. O custo médio no grupo parcialmente implantado foi mais elevado, sugerindo possível desperdício de recursos, uma vez que a produtividade das equipes é insuficiente para a capacidade instalada.

Related collections

Most cited references 54

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?

Gary Darmstadt, Zulfiqar Bhutta, Simon Cousens … (2005)

In this second article of the neonatal survival series, we identify 16 interventions with proven efficacy (implementation under ideal conditions) for neonatal survival and combine them into packages for scaling up in health systems, according to three service delivery modes (outreach, family-community, and facility-based clinical care). All the packages of care are cost effective compared with single interventions. Universal (99%) coverage of these interventions could avert an estimated 41-72% of neonatal deaths worldwide. At 90% coverage, intrapartum and postnatal packages have similar effects on neonatal mortality--two-fold to three-fold greater than that of antenatal care. However, running costs are two-fold higher for intrapartum than for postnatal care. A combination of universal--ie, for all settings--outreach and family-community care at 90% coverage averts 18-37% of neonatal deaths. Most of this benefit is derived from family-community care, and greater effect is seen in settings with very high neonatal mortality. Reductions in neonatal mortality that exceed 50% can be achieved with an integrated, high-coverage programme of universal outreach and family-community care, consisting of 12% and 26%, respectively, of total running costs, plus universal facility-based clinical services, which make up 62% of the total cost. Early success in averting neonatal deaths is possible in settings with high mortality and weak health systems through outreach and family-community care, including health education to improve home-care practices, to create demand for skilled care, and to improve care seeking. Simultaneous expansion of clinical care for babies and mothers is essential to achieve the reduction in neonatal deaths needed to meet the Millennium Development Goal for child survival.

0 comments Cited 556 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

A Donabedian (1988)

Before assessment can begin we must decide how quality is to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contributions of patients and of the health care system; on how broadly health and responsibility for health are defined; on whether the maximally effective or optimally effective care is sought; and on whether individual or social preferences define the optimum. We also need detailed information about the causal linkages among the structural attributes of the settings in which care occurs, the processes of care, and the outcomes of care. Specifying the components or outcomes of care to be sampled, formulating the appropriate criteria and standards, and obtaining the necessary information are the steps that follow. Though we know much about assessing quality, much remains to be known.

0 comments Cited 256 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States.

R Russell, N. S. Green, C. A. Steiner … (2007)

The objective of this study was to estimate national hospital costs for infant admissions that are associated with preterm birth/low birth weight. Infant ( 35 million hospital discharges nationwide. Hospital costs, based on weighted cost-to-charge ratios, and lengths of stay were calculated for preterm/low birth weight infants, uncomplicated newborns, and all other infant hospitalizations and assessed by degree of prematurity, major complications, and expected payer. In 2001, 8% (384,200) of all 4.6 million infant stays nationwide included a diagnosis of preterm birth/low birth weight. Costs for these preterm/low birth weight admissions totaled $5.8 billion, representing 47% of the costs for all infant hospitalizations and 27% for all pediatric stays. Preterm/low birth weight infant stays averaged $15,100, with a mean length of stay of 12.9 days versus $600 and 1.9 days for uncomplicated newborns. Costs were highest for extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks' gestation/birth weight <1000 g), averaging $65,600, and for specific respiratory-related complications. However, two thirds of total hospitalization costs for preterm birth/low birth weight were for the substantial number of infants who were not extremely preterm. Of all preterm/low birth weight infant stays, 50% identified private/commercial insurance as the expected payer, and 42% designated Medicaid. Costs per infant hospitalization were highest for extremely preterm infants, although the larger number of moderately preterm/low birth weight infants contributed more to the overall costs. Preterm/low birth weight infants in the United States account for half of infant hospitalization costs and one quarter of pediatric costs, suggesting that major infant and pediatric cost savings could be realized by preventing preterm birth.

0 comments Cited 144 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

SciELO Brazil ID:: S0034-89102011000300004

DOI:: 10.1590/s0034-89102011005000014

License:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

ScienceOpen disciplines: Public health

Keywords: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation,Prenatal Care,Family Health Program,Evaluation Studies as Topic,Avaliación de Costo-Efectividad,Atención Prenatal,Programa de Salud Familiar,Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto,Avaliação de Custo-Efetividade,Cuidado Pré-Natal,Programa Saúde da Família,Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto

Estudo exploratório de custos e conseqüências do pré-natal no Programa Saúde da Família

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

SciELO Brazil

Most cited references 54

Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?

The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States.

Author and article information

Journal

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 635

Cited by 2

Most referenced authors 414