38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors?

      Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
      Adenocarcinoma, epidemiology, pathology, therapy, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Biopsy, Needle, Carcinoma, Endometrioid, Case-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Contraceptives, Oral, adverse effects, Databases, Factual, Diabetes Mellitus, Disease-Free Survival, Endometrial Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Obesity, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Smoking, Survival Analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Endometrial cancers have long been divided into estrogen-dependent type I and the less common clinically aggressive estrogen-independent type II. Little is known about risk factors for type II tumors because most studies lack sufficient cases to study these much less common tumors separately. We examined whether so-called classical endometrial cancer risk factors also influence the risk of type II tumors. Individual-level data from 10 cohort and 14 case-control studies from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were pooled. A total of 14,069 endometrial cancer cases and 35,312 controls were included. We classified endometrioid (n = 7,246), adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (n = 4,830), and adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation (n = 777) as type I tumors and serous (n = 508) and mixed cell (n = 346) as type II tumors. Parity, oral contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, age at menarche, and diabetes were associated with type I and type II tumors to similar extents. Body mass index, however, had a greater effect on type I tumors than on type II tumors: odds ratio (OR) per 2 kg/m(2) increase was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.21) for type I and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.14) for type II tumors (P heterogeneity < .0001). Risk factor patterns for high-grade endometrioid tumors and type II tumors were similar. The results of this pooled analysis suggest that the two endometrial cancer types share many common etiologic factors. The etiology of type II tumors may, therefore, not be completely estrogen independent, as previously believed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article