25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Recovery from COVID-19 in a patient with spondyloarthritis treated with TNF-alpha inhibitor etanercept.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)) outbreak is a major public health concern worldwide, while it is spreading globally. It is not yet known whether immunomodulatory treatments used in patients with autoimmune and rheumatic diseases are associated with better or poorer outcomes over the course of COVID-19. We report the case of a recovery from COVID-19 in a 60-year-old immunocompromised man, treated with tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor (the soluble TNF receptor: etanercept 50 mg, subcutaneous, weekly) and methotrexate (20 mg subcutaneous, weekly), for spondyloarthritis. One week after the categorisation of eastern France as a new cluster of COVID-19 and 2 days after the weekly subcutaneous injection of 50 mg etanercept, the patient developed fever (up to 39°C), cough, myalgias and diarrhoeas. Five days after the onset of symptoms, the patient was referred to the local emergency department where the SARS-CoV2 was detected by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR on a nasopharyngeal swab. There was no sign of respiratory distress and the patient did not require intensive care unit. Blood tests did not show leucopenia or lymphopenia with 4.12 x 109/L leucocytes and 1.04 x 109/L lymphocytes, respectively. C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 63 mg/L; procalcitonin was 0.06 µg/L. The chest X-ray did not show alveolar or interstitial opacity. Thoracic CT scan was not performed. The treatment consisted of intravenous paracetamol without the need of antiviral drugs, steroids, antibiotics or intravenous immunoglobulins. In addition, no respiratory support was needed over the whole hospitalisation period. The outcome was favourable with regression of fever, cough and myalgias at day 10, along with a decrease of the CRP reaching 16 mg/L. At this stage of the epidemic and given the limited resources for RT-PCR testing, systematic viral monitoring was not performed. The patient was discharged at day 14. In our observation, the use of a TNF-α inhibitor prior to the viral infection was not associated with a severe evolution of the COVID-19. To date, there is no effective treatment available for COVID-19. Aside from an antiviral treatment strategy, targeting the inflammatory cascade should be considered, particularly for the most severe cases, in which the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome is intimately associated with a cytokine release syndrome (CRS). In 2004, E. Tobinick has suggested the use of TNF-α inhibitors for SARS coronavirus infection.1 Although TNF-α inhibitors have failed to demonstrate efficacy for the treatment of septic shock,2 it is unclear whether a cytokine blockade strategy could be effective in CRS associated with COVID-19.3 4 On 17 April 2020, a total of 40 clinical trials out of the 662 registered for COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov) have included biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b-DMARDs) or targeted synthetic DMARDs (ts-DMARDs), derived from the rheumatological armamentarium,5 to be repurposed for the management of COVID-19-related CRS. Of biologics, priority has so far been given to the interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitors (tocilizumab; sarilumab) and the IL-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra), which are currently evaluated in 21, 8 and 5 trials, respectively. Tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra are all included in the French adaptive trial ‘CORIMUNO-19’, a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) (NCT04331808, NCT04324073 and NCT04341584, respectively). Interestingly, adalimumab is the only TNF-α inhibitor undergoing evaluation, in a trial registered in China (ChiCTR2000030089). Concerning ts-DMARDs, Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib are evaluated in one and five trials, respectively. As the outbreak is spreading exponentially, patients exposed to DMARDs and infected by the SARS-CoV2 will expand concurrently. The implementation, in a collaborative effort of registries dedicated to the report and monitoring of COVID-19 occurring in patients with rheumatic diseases, including the ‘EULAR-COVID-19 database’, ‘The COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance’ registry,6 along with databases supported by national societies, will provide merged data and novel evidence regarding the impact of DMARDs on COVID-19 outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression

          As of March 12, 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been confirmed in 125 048 people worldwide, carrying a mortality of approximately 3·7%, 1 compared with a mortality rate of less than 1% from influenza. There is an urgent need for effective treatment. Current focus has been on the development of novel therapeutics, including antivirals and vaccines. Accumulating evidence suggests that a subgroup of patients with severe COVID-19 might have a cytokine storm syndrome. We recommend identification and treatment of hyperinflammation using existing, approved therapies with proven safety profiles to address the immediate need to reduce the rising mortality. Current management of COVID-19 is supportive, and respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the leading cause of mortality. 2 Secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) is an under-recognised, hyperinflammatory syndrome characterised by a fulminant and fatal hypercytokinaemia with multiorgan failure. In adults, sHLH is most commonly triggered by viral infections 3 and occurs in 3·7–4·3% of sepsis cases. 4 Cardinal features of sHLH include unremitting fever, cytopenias, and hyperferritinaemia; pulmonary involvement (including ARDS) occurs in approximately 50% of patients. 5 A cytokine profile resembling sHLH is associated with COVID-19 disease severity, characterised by increased interleukin (IL)-2, IL-7, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, interferon-γ inducible protein 10, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α, and tumour necrosis factor-α. 6 Predictors of fatality from a recent retrospective, multicentre study of 150 confirmed COVID-19 cases in Wuhan, China, included elevated ferritin (mean 1297·6 ng/ml in non-survivors vs 614·0 ng/ml in survivors; p 39·4°C 49 Organomegaly None 0 Hepatomegaly or splenomegaly 23 Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly 38 Number of cytopenias * One lineage 0 Two lineages 24 Three lineages 34 Triglycerides (mmol/L) 4·0 mmol/L 64 Fibrinogen (g/L) >2·5 g/L 0 ≤2·5 g/L 30 Ferritin ng/ml 6000 ng/ml 50 Serum aspartate aminotransferase <30 IU/L 0 ≥30 IU/L 19 Haemophagocytosis on bone marrow aspirate No 0 Yes 35 Known immunosuppression † No 0 Yes 18 The Hscore 11 generates a probability for the presence of secondary HLH. HScores greater than 169 are 93% sensitive and 86% specific for HLH. Note that bone marrow haemophagocytosis is not mandatory for a diagnosis of HLH. HScores can be calculated using an online HScore calculator. 11 HLH=haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. * Defined as either haemoglobin concentration of 9·2 g/dL or less (≤5·71 mmol/L), a white blood cell count of 5000 white blood cells per mm3 or less, or platelet count of 110 000 platelets per mm3 or less, or all of these criteria combined. † HIV positive or receiving longterm immunosuppressive therapy (ie, glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, azathioprine).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trials of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for COVID-19 are urgently needed

            With more than 81 000 deaths worldwide from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by April 8, 2020, 1 it is incumbent on researchers to accelerate clinical trials of any readily available and potentially acceptably safe therapies that could reduce the rising death toll. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) gains access to host cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, which is expressed in the type II surfactant-secreting alveolar cells of the lungs. 2 Severe COVID-19 is associated with a major immune inflammatory response with abundant neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and immune mediators. Which mediators are most important in driving the immune pathology remains to be elucidated. Deaths from COVID-19 are chiefly due to diffuse alveolar damage with pulmonary oedema, hyaline membrane formation, and interstitial mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate compatible with early-phase adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 3 Prevention of ARDS and death in patients with COVID-19 is a pressing health emergency. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies have been used for more than 20 years in severe cases of autoimmune inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or ankylosing spondylitis. There are ten (as reported on Sept 29, 2019) US Food and Drug Administration approved and four off-label indications for anti-TNF therapy, 4 indicating that TNF is a valid target in many inflammatory diseases. TNF is present in blood and disease tissues of patients with COVID-19 5 and TNF is important in nearly all acute inflammatory reactions, acting as an amplifier of inflammation. We propose that anti-TNF therapy should be evaluated in patients with COVID-19 on hospital admission to prevent progression to needing intensive care support. There is evidence of an inflammatory excess in patients with COVID-19. Lung pathology in COVID-19 is characterised by capillary leakage of fluid and recruitment of immune-inflammatory lymphocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages, 6 implying a role for adhesion molecules, chemokines, and cytokines targeting vascular endothelium. Cytokine upregulation is documented in COVID-19. In patients with COVID-19, there is upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, TNF, and interferon γ,7, 8 and patients in intensive care units have increased concentrations of many cytokines. Preliminary data from Salford Royal Hospital and the University of Manchester in the UK document the presence of proliferating excess monocytes expressing TNF by intracellular staining in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care (Hussell T, Grainger J, Menon M, Mann E, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, personal communication). Available cytokine data on immunology and inflammation in COVID-19 are summarised in the appendix. Initial reports comprising a trial of 21 severe and critical COVID-19 patients in China (ChiCTR2000029765) and a case study from France 9 of clinical benefit with the anti-IL6 receptor antibody 10 tocilizumab in COVID-19 suggest that cytokines are of importance in the “cytokine storm” and further controlled clinical trials are in progress. Although there are many potential drug candidates for reducing inflammation in COVID-19, only a few drugs such as the anti-TNF antibodies infliximab or adalimumab are potentially effective, widely available, and have a well established safety profile. The potential role of anti-TNF therapy thus warrants consideration. Preclinical studies suggest that the response to severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza in mice is ameliorated by anti-TNF therapy, which reduces weight loss, disease duration, and cell and fluid infiltrate. 11 This research suggests a potential rationale for use of anti-TNF therapy in viral pneumonia, especially given the known mechanism of action of TNF and the reversal of TNF-induced immunopathology by TNF blockade in multiple diseases. It is known TNF is produced in most types of inflammation, especially in the acute phase, and is important in the coordination and development of the inflammatory response. However, too much production of TNF for too long becomes immune suppressive. 12 Blockade of TNF alone is clinically effective in many circumstances and diseases, despite the presence of many other pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators. There is evidence of a “TNF dependent cytokine cascade” in rheumatoid arthritis tissue and upon bacterial challenge in baboons.13, 14 Thus, if TNF is blocked, there is a rapid (ie, <12 h) decrease of IL-6 and IL-1 concentrations in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis 15 and, importantly, a reduction of adhesion molecules and vascular endothelial growth factor, which is also known as vascular permeability factor, denoting its importance in capillary leak.15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Furthermore, a reduction in leucocyte trafficking occurs in inflamed tissues of joints due to reduction in adhesion molecules and chemokines 20 with reduction in cell content and exudate. Finally, after anti-TNF infusion tissue TNF is reduced as it passes into the blood bound to the anti-TNF antibody. Blood concentrations of immunoreactive, but biologically inactive, TNF increase more than ten times after infusion. 15 For these reasons it is possible that a single infusion of anti-TNF antibody might reduce some of the processes that occur during COVID-19 lung inflammation, reducing TNF and other inflammatory mediators, cellularity, and exudate. © 2020 Marco Mantovani/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. What would be the best time for intervention with anti-TNF therapy in patients with COVID-19? We postulate that the earlier the better after hospital admission might be the answer because patients will already have initiated anti-viral immunity for several days. There is a balance to be struck between stage of intervention and ensuring patients are at sufficient risk of a poor outcome and can be appropriately monitored. We propose that initial assessment of anti-TNF therapy in clinical trials should be in patients with moderate disease admitted to hospital and who require oxygen support but not intensive care. If this treatment approach proved beneficial with a good safety profile, treatment in the community for people identified as being at high risk of progressing to hospital admission might be considered. The range of available formulations and administration routes of anti-TNF products could facilitate this treatment approach. Is there a trade-off between immunity and virus clearance? The use of powerful anti-inflammatory drugs in acute viral diseases has to be approached with caution because of the risk of increasing viral replication or bacterial infections. For lung viral infections, the higher the infectious dose, the greater the tissue damage from viral replication and the ensuing immune response. In animal models that resemble lung viral infection in humans, the immune response to the virus is so great that even a moderate reduction in inflammation is beneficial—eg, mice with severe pneumonia from RSV or influenza benefit from anti-TNF treatment without compromising viral clearance 11 because more of the lung architecture is preserved. However, concerns about safety are important when considering new therapy. Would anti-TNF therapy increase the risk of bacterial or fungal super-infections? After respiratory viral infection, superinfections with other organisms occur at the most severe end of the disease spectrum. Many research groups have elucidated the mechanisms responsible 21 and anecdotal evidence suggests that bacteria might have a role in in COVID-19,5, 22 although this remains to be confirmed. Bacteria gain a foothold faster in a lung that is damaged. Experimental studies suggest that if the duration of inflammation is limited, with its associated collateral lung damage, then bacterial superinfection is reduced. 23 There is concern that anti-TNF therapy might increase the risk of bacterial infection. 24 Yet two randomised studies in critically unwell patients with septic shock25, 26 showed that monoclonal anti-TNF therapy had good safety data with no evidence of increased secondary bacterial infections in the anti-TNF treated group. In an observational trial in rheumatoid arthritis patients with serious infections, the risk of sepsis and death was reduced in patients on TNF inhibitors compared with those on synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS). 27 46 (11%) of 399 patients on TNF inhibitors developed sepsis after serious infection, of whom 20 (43%) died, compared with 74 (17%) of 444 patients on DMARDS who developed sepsis, of whom 54 (74%) died. 27 Paradoxically, another class of TNF inhibitor, a TNF-R2 Ig-Fc fusion protein, etanercept, was associated with moderately increased mortality in a randomised trial of this treatment for sepsis, 28 possibly due to its faster off-rate for TNF potentially resulting in some redistribution and bioavailability of pathogenic TNF rather than its clearance. There has been interest as to whether the safety of anti-TNF therapy in patients with COVID-19 might be gleaned from analysis of the course of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or rheumatoid arthritis who are already on anti-TNF treatment. As of April 6, 2020, on SECURE-IBD, a coronavirus and IBD reporting database with a register of outcomes of IBD patients with COVID-19, there were 116 patients on anti-TNF therapy alone, 99 of whom recovered without hospitalisation and one patient died. By contrast, about half of 71 patients on sulfasalazine/mesalamine recovered without hospital admission and six patients died. Thus IBD patients with COVID-19 on anti-TNF therapy do not fare worse than those treated with other drugs, but there are insufficient data to make conclusions about a better outcome. We believe there is sufficient evidence to support clinical trials of anti-TNF therapy in patients with COVID-19. With an average of 2 days between hospital admission and ARDS, 7 we propose anti-TNF therapy should be initiated as early as is practicable. If there is preliminary evidence of benefit and safety of anti-TNF therapy in hospitalised patients, we suggest consideration should be given to out of hospital treatment for patients with COVID-19 at high risk, such as older people and those with pre-existing conditions, and who can be monitored appropriately.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close!

              The outbreak of the new coronavirus infections COVID-19 in December 2019 in China has quickly become a global health emergency. Given the lack of specific anti-viral therapies, the current management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2) is mainly supportive, even though several compounds are now under investigation for the treatment of this life-threatening disease. COVID-19 pandemic is certainly conditioning the treatment strategy of a complex disorder as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whose infectious risk is increased compared to the general population because of an overall impairment of immune system typical of autoimmune diseases combined with the iatrogenic effect generated by corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, the increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection is leading to consider some anti-rheumatic drugs as potential treatment options for the management of COVID-19. In this review we will critically analyse the evidences on either positive or negative effect of drugs commonly used to treat RA in this particular scenario, in order to optimize the current approach to RA patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Rheum Dis
                Annals of the rheumatic diseases
                BMJ
                1468-2060
                0003-4967
                September 2020
                : 79
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Rheumatology, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, Colmar, Alsace, France pierremarie.duret@gmail.com.
                [2 ] Department of Rheumatology-Centre National de Référence des Maladies Systémiques Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
                [3 ] Department of Rheumatology, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, Colmar, Alsace, France.
                [4 ] Department of Infectious Diseases, Hopitaux Civils de Colmar, Colmar, Alsace, France.
                Article
                annrheumdis-2020-217362
                10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217362
                7456545
                32354772
                2e1c8b3f-9e82-4e29-bf94-16484187e9b5
                History

                antirheumatic agents,arthritis, infectious,biological therapy,spondylitis, ankylosing,tumour necrosis factor inhibitors

                Comments

                Comment on this article