1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correction: Citizen science in eDNA monitoring for Mediterranean monk seal conservation

      correction

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Citizen science in eDNA monitoring for mediterranean monk seal conservation

          Background Citizen Science (CS) offers a promising approach to enhance data collection and engage communities in conservation efforts. This study evaluates the use of CS in environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring for Mediterranean monk seal conservation. We validated CS by assessing the effectiveness of a newly developed CS-friendly filtration system called “WET” (Water eDNA Trap) in eDNA detection, addressing technical challenges, and analysing volunteer faults. The WET is a 4-litre, manual pump-based filtering system using positive pressure to force water through the filter. We also assessed the use of a retrospective questionnaire as a tool to measure CS’s social impact on participants’ perceived knowledge, attitudes, and conservation behaviours. Results Results suggest the WET performs comparably to traditional methods, with minor technical issues. Despite some faults such as not folding or forgetting to change the filter, volunteers were generally reliable in sample processing. Moreover, CS involvement increased participants’ perceived knowledge, affective attitudes, and conservation behaviours towards seal conservation. Volunteers reported a greater understanding of eDNA monitoring, increased interest in monk seal conservation, and more frequent conservation behaviours, including spreading awareness within their community. While these findings are exploratory due to the small sample size (19 participants) and potential ceiling effects in attitude assessment, they provide an initial validation of the questionnaire as a tool for measuring CS’s social outcomes. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results and investigate their applicability across broader stakeholder groups. Continuous improvement in volunteer training and equipment design is also recommended. Conclusions This study highlights CS’s potential to improve public engagement and knowledge in conservation. By involving diverse participants, CS can play a critical role in long-term conservation efforts and promote sustainable coexistence between humans and monk seals. Furthermore, the validation of the questionnaire offers a valuable framework for evaluating the social impact of CS initiatives in conservation contexts. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-024-02338-8.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            v1sbonic@exseed.ed.ac.uk , sofia.bonicalza@gmail.com
            Journal
            BMC Ecol Evol
            BMC Ecol Evol
            BMC Ecology and Evolution
            BioMed Central (London )
            2730-7182
            7 January 2025
            7 January 2025
            2025
            : 25
            : 4
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, ( https://ror.org/01nrxwf90) Edinburgh, UK
            [2 ]Gruppo Foca Monaca APS, Via Carlo Emery 47, 00188 Rome, Italy
            [3 ]Department of Environmental and Earth Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, ( https://ror.org/01ynf4891) Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milan, Italy
            Article
            2348
            10.1186/s12862-025-02348-0
            11706199
            16147f88-df4b-4e87-b56f-7d9d6a0d9877
            © The Author(s) 2025

            Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Categories
            Correction
            Custom metadata
            © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2025

            Comments

            Comment on this article