19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A biobehavioral framework to address the emerging challenge of multi-morbidity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multi-morbidity, the co-occurrence of multiple physical or psychological illnesses, is prevalent particularly among older adults. The number of Americans with multiple chronic diseases is projected to increase from 57 million in 2000 to 81 million in 2020. However, behavioral medicine and health psychology, while focusing on the co-occurrence of psychological/psychiatric disorders with primary medical morbidities, have historically tended to ignore the co-occurrence of primary medical comorbidities, such as diabetes and cancer, and their biopsychosocial implications. This approach may hinder our ecologically valid understanding of the etiology, prevention, and treatment of individual patients with multi-morbidity. In this selective review, we propose a heuristic biobehavioral framework for the etiology of multi-morbidity. More acknowledgment and systematic research on multiple, co-existing disorders in behavioral medicine is consistent with the biopsychosocial model’s emphasis on treating the “whole person,” which means not considering any single illness, its symptoms, risk factors, or mechanisms, in isolation. As systems analytics, big data, machine learning, and mixed model trajectory analyses, among others, come on-line and become more widely available, we may be able to tackle multi-morbidity more holistically, efficiently and satisfactorily.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cumulative illness rating scale.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The implications of human metabolic network topology for disease comorbidity.

            Most diseases are the consequence of the breakdown of cellular processes, but the relationships among genetic/epigenetic defects, the molecular interaction networks underlying them, and the disease phenotypes remain poorly understood. To gain insights into such relationships, here we constructed a bipartite human disease association network in which nodes are diseases and two diseases are linked if mutated enzymes associated with them catalyze adjacent metabolic reactions. We find that connected disease pairs display higher correlated reaction flux rate, corresponding enzyme-encoding gene coexpression, and higher comorbidity than those that have no metabolic link between them. Furthermore, the more connected a disease is to other diseases, the higher is its prevalence and associated mortality rate. The network topology-based approach also helps to uncover potential mechanisms that contribute to their shared pathophysiology. Thus, the structure and modeled function of the human metabolic network can provide insights into disease comorbidity, with potentially important consequences for disease diagnosis and prevention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anger, anxiety, and depression as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the problems and implications of overlapping affective dispositions.

              Several recent reviews have identified 3 affective dispositions--depression, anxiety, and anger-hostility--as putative risk factors for coronary heart disease. There are, however, mixed and negative results. Following a critical summary of epidemiological findings, the present article discusses the construct and measurement overlap among the 3 negative affects. Recognition of the overlap necessitates the development of more complex affect-disease models and has implications for the interpretation of prior studies, statistical analyses, prevention, and intervention in health psychology and behavioral medicine. The overlap among the 3 negative dispositions also leaves open the possibility that a general disposition toward negative affectivity may be more important for disease risk than any specific negative affect.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                0376505
                6793
                Psychosom Med
                Psychosom Med
                Psychosomatic medicine
                0033-3174
                1534-7796
                11 March 2016
                April 2016
                01 April 2017
                : 78
                : 3
                : 281-289
                Affiliations
                Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
                Chief, behavioral and Psychological Sciences Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
                Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical College, New York, NY
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Jerry Suls, PhD, Office of the Associate Director, Behavioral Research Program, 3E-138, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9761, Bethesda, MD 20892-9761
                Article
                PMC4889007 PMC4889007 4889007 nihpa764418
                10.1097/PSY.0000000000000294
                4889007
                26867072
                af389986-3784-4e3e-b7dc-f4c1ad958c2c
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Multi-morbidity,multiple chronic conditions,biopsychosocial model,health psychology,behavioral medicine,co-morbidity

                Comments

                Comment on this article