45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical and dopamine transporter imaging characteristics of non-manifest LRRK2 and GBA mutation carriers in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI): a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          The Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) is an ongoing observational, longitudinal cohort study of participants with Parkinson’s disease, healthy controls, and carriers of the most common Parkinson’s disease-related genetic mutations, which aims to define biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis and progression. All participants are assessed annually with a battery of motor and non-motor scales, 123-I Ioflupane dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging, and biological variables. We aimed to examine whether non-manifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA mutations have prodromal features of Parkinson’s disease that correlate with reduced DAT binding.

          Methods

          This cross-sectional analysis is based on assessments done at enrolment in the subset of non-manifesting carriers of LRRK2 and GBA mutations enrolled into the PPMI study from 33 participating sites worldwide. The primary objective was to examine baseline clinical and DAT imaging characteristics in non-manifesting carriers with GBA and LRRK2 mutations compared with healthy controls. DAT deficit was defined as less than 65% of putamen striatal binding ratio expected for the individual’s age. We used t tests, χ 2 tests, and Fisher’s exact tests to compare baseline demographics across groups. An inverse probability weighting method was applied to control for potential confounders such as age and sex. To account for multiple comparisons, we applied a family-wise error rate to each set of analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number [Related object:].

          Findings

          Between Jan 1, 2014, and Jan 1, 2019, the study enrolled 208 LRRK2 (93% G2019S) and 184 GBA (96% N370S) non-manifesting carriers. Both groups were similar with respect to mean age, and about 60% were female. Of the 286 (73%) non-manifesting carriers that had DAT imaging results, 18 (11%) LRRK2 and four (3%) GBA non-manifesting carriers had a DAT deficit. Compared with healthy controls, both LRRK2 and GBA non-manifesting carriers had significantly increased mean scores on the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (total score 4·6 [SD 4·4] healthy controls vs 8·4 [7·3] LRRK2 vs 9·5 [9·2] GBA, p<0·0001 for both comparisons) and the Scale for Outcomes for PD - autonomic function (5·8 [3·7] vs 8·1 [5·9] and 8·4 [6·0], p<0·0001 for both comparisons). There was no difference in daytime sleepiness, anxiety, depression, impulsive-compulsive disorders, blood pressure, urate, and rapid eye movement (REM) behaviour disorder scores. Hyposmia was significantly more common only in LRRK2 non-manifesting carriers (69 [36%] of 194 healthy controls vs 114 [55%] of 208 LRRK2 non-manifesting carriers; p=0·0003). Finally, GBA but not LRRK2 non-manifesting carriers showed increased DAT striatal binding ratios compared with healthy controls in the caudate (healthy controls 2·98 [SD 0·63] vs GBA 3·26 [0·63]; p<0·0001), putamen (2·15 [0·56] vs 2·48 [0·52]; p<0·0001), and striatum (2·56 [0·57] vs 2·87 [0·55]; p<0·0001).

          Interpretation

          Our data show evidence of subtle motor and non-motor signs of Parkinson’s disease in non-manifesting carriers compared with healthy controls that can precede DAT deficit. Longitudinal data will be essential to confirm these findings and define the trajectory and predictors for development of Parkinson’s disease.

          Funding

          Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101139309
          30413
          Lancet Neurol
          Lancet Neurol
          The Lancet. Neurology
          1474-4422
          1474-4465
          20 December 2019
          31 October 2019
          January 2020
          01 January 2021
          : 19
          : 1
          : 71-80
          Affiliations
          Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA (Prof T Simuni MD); Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA (L Uribe MS, HR Cho PhD, C Caspell-Garcia MS, Prof CS Coffey PhD); Departments of Neurology (Prof A Siderowf MD, Prof D Weintraub MD), Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Prof J Q Trojanowski MD, Prof LM Shaw PhD), Departments of Psychiatry (Prof D Weintraub), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA (J Seibyl MD); Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA (A Singleton PhD); Laboratory of Neuroimaging (LONI), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA (Prof AW Toga PhD); Department of Neurology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA (Prof D Galasko MD); Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA (ProfT Foroud PhD); Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA (D Tosun PhD, Prof C M Tanner MD); Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA (K Poston MD); Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany; Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik, Kassel, Germany (B Mollenhauer MD); Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA (Prof K Kieburtz MD); Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (L M Chahine MD); The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, New York, NY, USA (A Reimer BS, S J Hutten PhD); Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA (Prof S Bressman MD); and Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA (K Marek MD)
          Author notes

          Contributors

          TS, LU, HR, CSC, ASid, JQT, ASin, DG, TF, KP, DW, BM, CMT, KK, LMC, and KM drafted and revised the manuscript (including medical writing). TS, CSC, ASid, JS, ASin, DW, BM, CMT, KM, LMC, and KM conceived or designed the study. TF, DW, BM, and CMT supervised and coordinated the study. LU, CSC, JS, AWT, and DT acquired the data. JS and AWT managed the data. TS, LU, HR, CC-G, CSC, ASid, JQT, LMS, DG, DW, BM, CMT, KK, LMC, AR, SJH, SB, and KM analysed or interpreted the data. CSC, LU, HR, and CC-G did the statistical analyses, and LU, HR, and CC-G created the figures.

          [*]

          A full list of investigators is presented at the end of Article

          Correspondence to: Prof Tanya Simuni, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA, tsimuni@ 123456nmff.org
          Article
          PMC6956652 PMC6956652 6956652 nihpa1064610
          10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30319-9
          6956652
          31678032
          fe47c362-de6b-455e-8404-ce6e5c35cadb
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article