19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protein Determination—Method Matters

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The reported protein content of foods depends on the analytical method used for determination, making a direct comparison between studies difficult. The aim of this study was to examine and compare protein analytical methods. Some of these methods require extraction preceding analysis. The efficacy of protein extraction differs depending on food matrices and thus extraction yield was determined. Overall, most analytical methods overestimated the protein contents. The inaccuracies were linked to indirect measurements, i.e., nitrogen determination and subsequent conversion to protein, or interference from other chemical substances. Amino acid analysis is the only protein analysis method where interfering substances do not affect the results. Although there is potential for improvement in regards to the hydrolysis method, we recommend that this method should be the preferred for food protein determination.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives a linear photometric response.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Converting nitrogen into protein--beyond 6.25 and Jones' factors.

              The protein content in foodstuffs is estimated by multiplying the determined nitrogen content by a nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor. Jones' factors for a series of foodstuffs, including 6.25 as the standard, default conversion factor, have now been used for 75 years. This review provides a brief history of these factors and their underlying paradigm, with an insight into what is meant by "protein." We also review other compelling data on specific conversion factors which may have been overlooked. On the one hand, when 6.25 is used irrespective of the foodstuff, "protein" is simply nitrogen expressed using a different unit and says little about protein (s.s.). On the other hand, conversion factors specific to foodstuffs, such as those provided by Jones, are scientifically flawed. However, the nitrogen:protein ratio does vary according to the foodstuff considered. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it would be reasonable not to apply current specific factors any longer, but they have continued to be used because scientists fear opening the Pandora's box. But because conversion factors are critical to enabling the simple conversion of determined nitrogen values into protein values and thus accurately evaluating the quantity and the quality of protein in foodstuffs, we propose a set of specific conversion factors for different foodstuffs, together with a default conversion factor (5.6). This would be far more accurate and scientifically sound, and preferable when specifically expressing nitrogen as protein. These factors are of particular importance when "protein" basically means "amino acids," this being the principal nutritional viewpoint.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Foods
                Foods
                foods
                Foods
                MDPI
                2304-8158
                01 January 2018
                January 2018
                : 7
                : 1
                : 5
                Affiliations
                Norwegian College of Fishery Science, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway; lars.dalheim@ 123456uit.no (L.D.); guro.k.edvinsen@ 123456uit.no (G.K.E.); edel.elvevoll@ 123456uit.no (E.O.E.); ida-johanne.jensen@ 123456uit.no (I.-J.J.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: hanne.maehre@ 123456uit.no ; Tel.: +47-7764-6793
                Article
                foods-07-00005
                10.3390/foods7010005
                5789268
                29301260
                da7380f8-650f-4252-9ab1-b2b6547cd6ac
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 November 2017
                : 28 December 2017
                Categories
                Article

                proteins,amino acids,analytical methods,extraction methods,kjeldahl,bradford,lowry

                Comments

                Comment on this article