9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Systems Thinking Approach to Understanding and Demonstrating the Role of Peer-Led Programs and Leadership in the Response to HIV and Hepatitis C: Findings From the W3 Project

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The central role of community and peer-led programs has been a key characteristic of the Australian partnership response to HIV and hepatitis C since the beginning of the epidemics. Despite this, peer-led programs continue to have limited capacity to demonstrate their role and value as part of a multi-sectoral response. What makes one peer-led program a better investment than another? What role does the rest of the sector have in ensuring we gain the most value from these investments? To investigate this, we facilitated interactive systems thinking methods with 10 programs working within communities of people who inject drugs, gay men, sex workers and people living with HIV across Australia. This included articulating program theories in diagram and textual form to help us understand the role of peer-based programs promoting peer leadership within the Australian HIV and hepatitis C responses. Our aim was to develop a framework for monitoring and evaluation that could be applied to peer led programs at different levels and in different contexts. We found that for peer-led programs to fulfill their role, and to navigate the rapid changes occurring in the both epidemics, they need to: demonstrate the credibility of their peer and community insights; continually adapt to changing contexts and policy priorities in tandem with their communities; and maintain influence in both community and policy systems. We developed a framework of four key functions (Engagement, Alignment, Adaptation, and Influence) which peer-based programs need to demonstrate, which form the basis for identifying quality indicators. This article presents a new way of framing and monitoring investments in peer-led programs and peer eadership actions by these programs. If health policy is committed to strengthening the leadership shown by affected communities, then we need to understand, enhance, monitor and value the role of peer-led programs and peer leadership within the overall prevention system. We believe the W3 framework, drawing on systems thinking and modeling, can support funders, policy-makers and programs to achieve this.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions

          In the first of a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy & Systems Research (HPSR), Kabir Sheikh and colleagues lay out the main questions vexing the field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Social Science Matters

            In the second in a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR), Lucy Gilson and colleagues argue the importance of insights from the social sciences.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A Community Based Systems Diagram of Obesity Causes

              Introduction Application of system thinking to the development, implementation and evaluation of childhood obesity prevention efforts represents the cutting edge of community-based prevention. We report on an approach to developing a system oriented community perspective on the causes of obesity. Methods Group model building sessions were conducted in a rural Australian community to address increasing childhood obesity. Stakeholders (n = 12) built a community model that progressed from connection circles to causal loop diagrams using scripts from the system dynamics literature. Participants began this work in identifying change over time in causes and effects of childhood obesity within their community. The initial causal loop diagram was then reviewed and elaborated by 50 community leaders over a full day session. Results The process created a causal loop diagram representing community perceptions of determinants and causes of obesity. The causal loop diagram can be broken down into four separate domains; social influences; fast food and junk food; participation in sport; and general physical activity. Discussion This causal loop diagram can provide the basis for community led planning of a prevention response that engages with multiple levels of existing settings and systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                31 August 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : 231
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [2] 2School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University , Canberra, ACT, Australia
                [3] 3National Association of People Living With HIV Australia , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [4] 4The Australian Injecting and Illicit Drug Users League , Canberra, ACT, Australia
                [5] 5Scarlet Alliance, Australian Sex Worker Association , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [6] 6Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Michal Grivna, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates

                Reviewed by: Pradeep Nair, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India; Deborah Elaine Seale, Des Moines University, United States

                *Correspondence: Graham Brown graham.brown@ 123456latrobe.edu.au

                †Present Address: Annie Madden, Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

                This article was submitted to Public Health Education and Promotion, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2018.00231
                6127267
                2ec1d3ac-e345-450a-8904-7034aadfc163
                Copyright © 2018 Brown, Reeders, Cogle, Madden, Kim and O'Donnell.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 May 2018
                : 30 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 55, Pages: 11, Words: 9258
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of Health, Australian Government 10.13039/501100003921
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                systems thinking,peer education,peer leaders,community,hiv,hepatitis c,leadership,evaluation

                Comments

                Comment on this article