1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detection of Reduced Diameter of the Cochlear Nerve in Long-term Deaf Patients Quantified With Semiautomatic Measurement of Nerve Cross-sectional Area Using 3T MRI Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hypothesis:

          High-resolution parallel transmit T2 sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution sequence with improved edge discrimination and semiautomatic determination of nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) can be used to evaluate nerve degeneration in the inner auditory canal (IAC) in long-term deaf patients.

          Background:

          In patients with hearing loss, temporal bone MRI is routinely acquired to evaluate the morphology of the nerves within the IAC. Earlier studies have shown that the diameter of the cochlear nerve can be used as prognostic marker for the auditory performance after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf patients.

          Methods:

          Eighty-two consecutive MRI scans were analyzed using a semiautomatic tool to measure CSA of cranial nerves in the IAC. Results were correlated with patient history and audiology testing as well as with age and gender.

          Results:

          There was a significant reduced CSA of the cochlear nerve in ears with moderate-to-profound hearing loss and deafness compared with ears with normal hearing, but no significant difference in ears with mild-to-moderate hearing loss compared with normal hearing. In detail, normal hearing ears had a CSA of 1.23 ± 0.11 mm 2, whereas ears with pantonal hearing loss of more than 40 dB had 1.02 ± 0.05 mm 2 ( P = 0.026). Maximal CSA of the facial nerve was not different among all groups (average, 1.04 mm 2 ± 0.03; linear regression, P = 0.001) and stable with age. However, vestibular nerve CSA decreased significantly with age (average, 1.78 ± 0.05 mm 2; linear regression, P = 0.128).

          Conclusions:

          In long-term deaf patients, smaller the diameter of cochlear nerve is the more severe the hearing loss is. The new semiautomatic tool can primarily be used to assess nerve diameter and possibly determine ears with nerve degeneration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diameter of the cochlear nerve in deaf humans: implications for cochlear implantation.

          Although the parameters that are most important for postoperative speech perception in cochlear implantation have not been identified, it is assumed that the numbers of remaining cochlear neurons and spiral ganglion cells in the implanted deaf ears are critical. In this study, we evaluated the correlation of the maximum diameter of the cochlear and vestibular nerve trunks with the number of spiral ganglion cells in horizontal sections of the temporal bone of 42 patients who were profoundly deaf during life, and in 5 patients with normal hearing. The maximum diameters of the cochlear, vestibular, and eighth cranial nerves were significantly smaller in the deaf population as compared to normal-hearing controls. In addition, the counts of the remaining spiral ganglion cells were significantly correlated with the maximum diameter of the cochlear (p = .0006), vestibular (p = .001), and eighth cranial nerves (p = .0003). The regression equation estimated that 25% of the variance of the spiral ganglion cell count was predicted by the maximum diameter of the eighth nerve. Although the results of this study suggest that preoperative radiographic imaging of the diameter of the eighth nerve may be helpful in predicting the residual spiral ganglion cell count, the wide variability of diameters of the eighth nerve in hearing and deaf subjects militates against this theoretic usefulness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia.

            Hypoplasia of the auditory nerve (AN) refers to significant narrowing of the VIIIth cranial nerve which could compromise stimulation of the nerve by electrical pulses delivered from a cochlear implant (CI), thereby hindering activity in other parts of the auditory pathways. To compensate, high current levels or increased charge may be required to elicit auditory perception causing current to spread to other cranial nerves and potentially resulting in unwanted myogenic responses. Deficits in central auditory activity could reduce perception of speech and language. In the present study, we measured auditory brainstem responses in children with and without hypoplasia of the AN to answer the following questions. In children with hypoplastic ANs, (a) can CI stimulation evoke typical patterns of activity from the AN and brainstem?, (b) do brainstem responses change with CI experience?, (c) are evoked responses dependent on the size of the AN pathway?, and (d) does auditory development measured by behavioral tests of speech perception develop more slowly than in peers with normal AN diameter?
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cochlear nerve size evaluation in children with sensorineural hearing loss by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

              To determine differences in size of cochlear nerves among subjects with deafness due to connexin 26 (Cx26) mutations, subjects with deafness of unknown origin, and normal hearing subjects by sagittal high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMR) imaging of the temporal bone.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Otol Neurotol Open
                Otol Neurotol Open
                ONO
                Otology & Neurotology Open
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2766-3604
                March 2024
                25 January 2024
                : 4
                : 1
                : e047
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Neuroradiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Address correspondence and reprint requests to Katrin Reimann, M.D., Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany; E-mail: katrin.reimann@ 123456staff.uni-marburg.de
                Article
                00002
                10.1097/ONO.0000000000000047
                10962875
                38533346
                e48a6833-4c41-4d21-9de2-7d06d2ca06c4
                Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 August 2023
                : 22 November 2023
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                3t mri,nerve cross-sectional area,semiautomatic measurement,shnl,presbyvertigo,ptx t2 space,vestibular nerve

                Comments

                Comment on this article