Prognostic Factors for the Outcome of Chemotherapy in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Analysis of 2,185 Patients Treated With Anthracycline-Containing First-Line Regimens—A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study

To define the prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to determine which patients should be considered for adjuvant treatment. Five hundred forty-six patients with a nonmetastatic and locally controlled STS, collected in a cooperative data base by the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) Sarcoma Group from 1980 and 1989, were studied. Histologic slides of all patients were collegially reviewed. Initial treatment consisted of complete tumor resection with amputation in only 4% of the patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 57.9% and adjuvant chemotherapy to 31%. Relationships between tumor characteristics were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox models for the hazards rate of tumor mortality, development of distant metastasis, and strictly local recurrence. Unfavorable characteristics with an independent prognostic value for tumor mortality were: grade 3 (P = 3 x 10(-10)), male sex (P = 1.5 x 10(-5)), no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 5.4 x 10(-5)), tumor size > or = 5 cm (P = 3.8 x 10(-3)), and deep location (P = 4.6 x 10(-3)). Unfavorable characteristics for the development of distant metastasis were: grade 3 (P = 4 x 10(-12)), no adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 6.4 x 10(-4)), tumor size > or = 10 cm (P = 9.8 x 10(-4)), and deep location (P = 1.3 x 10(-3)). For the development of local recurrence, the unfavorable characteristics were: no adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 3.6 x 10(-6)), poor surgery (local excision) (P = 2 x 10(-4)), grade 3 (P = 7.6 x 10(-4)), and deep location (P = 10(-2)). Grade, depth, and tumor size were used to define groups of patients according to the metastatic risk. Adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in terms of overall survival and metastasis-free survival in grade 3 tumor patients only. Despite worse characteristics concerning tumor depth, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) and American Joint Committee (AJC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) classifications and grade in patients with adjuvant radiotherapy, the latter experienced significantly fewer local recurrences than patients with no radiotherapy. Grade, tumor depth, and tumor size could be used to select patients with a high metastatic risk, for which adjuvant chemotherapy could be beneficial.

The authors sought to identify prognostic factors in the management of extremity soft tissue sarcoma. The surgical management of soft tissue sarcoma has evolved because of advances in therapy, resulting in increased limb preservation and quality of life. However, identifying a subset of patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy has been difficult to achieve. A retrospective analysis of a prospective data base of 182 patients with extremity sarcomas from 1970 to 1992 was performed. A histologic diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and angiosarcoma was associated with a 13-fold increased risk of death compared with liposarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath histologic types after having adjusted for the other prognostic factors (p < 0.001). In addition to histologic type, high-grade sarcomas (p = 0.018), sarcomas greater than 10 cm in size (p = 0.006), and age at diagnosis (p = 0.016) were found to be important prognostic factors for survival but not for local recurrence. For the first time to their knowledge, the authors showed that mean mitotic activity has prognostic value after having adjusted for other prognostic factors, such as grade (p = 0.005). The only prognostic factors predictive for local recurrence were whether the patient presented with locally recurrent disease (p = 0.0001) or had microscopically positive margins (p = 0.052). The use of mitotic activity along with grade, size, histologic type, and age at diagnosis is prognostic for survival in extremity soft tissue sarcoma. The use of an objective pathologic feature, such as mean mitotic activity, is also useful in selecting patients for future systemic neoadjuvant or adjuvant trials and primary therapy.

Various drug combinations including Adriamycin have been tested in soft tissue sarcomas, but optimal treatment remains unclear. We have evaluated Adriamycin with and without dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide (DTIC) in the treatment of Stage III or IV and recurrent sarcomas of the uterus. Two hundred and forty cases of these rare tumors were evaluable. Of 146 evaluable patients with measurable disease, 13/80 (16.3%) of Adriamycin-treated patients and 16/66 (24.2%) of patients receiving the combination showed an objective response (P greater than 0.05). Lung metastases responded more frequently (P equal to 0.04) to combination therapy, but there was no survival advantage. For patients with nonmeasurable disease the progression-free interval was similar (10.0 months for Adriamycin and 8.0 months for the combination). Leiomyosarcomas had a significantly longer survival than other cell types (12.1 versus 6.0 months, P less than 0.001) but there was no advantage for either regimen. There was a suggestion that heterologous mixed mesodermal sarcomas were more responsive to the combination (27.3 versus 8.7%). The addition of DTIC produced significantly more hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Other Adriamycin combinations should be evaluated in uterine sarcomas.