Human papillomavirus vaccine beliefs and intentions Post-COVID-19 vaccine release among mothers in Alabama.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

The current study sought to determine if the release of COVID-19 vaccines influenced Alabama mothers' attitudes and behaviors regarding HPV vaccination of their adolescent children.

Related collections

Most cited references 38

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Paul A Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke … (2009)

Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.

0 comments Cited 12403 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Is Open Access

Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.

Noni MacDonald (2015)

The SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy concluded that vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services. Vaccine hesitancy is complex and context specific, varying across time, place and vaccines. It is influenced by factors such as complacency, convenience and confidence. The Working Group retained the term 'vaccine' rather than 'vaccination' hesitancy, although the latter more correctly implies the broader range of immunization concerns, as vaccine hesitancy is the more commonly used term. While high levels of hesitancy lead to low vaccine demand, low levels of hesitancy do not necessarily mean high vaccine demand. The Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix displays the factors influencing the behavioral decision to accept, delay or reject some or all vaccines under three categories: contextual, individual and group, and vaccine/vaccination-specific influences.

0 comments Cited 2030 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Detecting, preventing, and responding to "fraudsters" in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs.

Jennifer E F Teitcher, Walter Bockting, Jose A. Bauermeister … (2015)

Internet-based health research is increasing, and often offers financial incentives but fraudulent behavior by participants can result. Specifically, eligible or ineligible individuals may enter the study multiple times and receive undeserved financial compensation. We review past experiences and approaches to this problem and propose several new strategies. Researchers can detect and prevent Internet research fraud in four broad ways: (1) through the questionnaire/instrument (e.g., including certain questions in survey; and software for administering survey); (2) through participants' non-questionnaire data and seeking external validation (e.g., checking data for same email addresses, usernames, passwords, and/or fake addresses or phone numbers; (3) through computer information, (e.g., IP addresses and cookies), and 4) through study design (e.g., avoid lump sum compensation and interviewing participants). These approaches each have pros and cons, and raise ethical, legal, and logistical questions, given that ethical tensions can emerge between preserving the integrity of research vs. protecting the privacy and confidentiality of study respondents. While past discussions concerning the ethics of online research have tended to focus on the participants' ability to trust the researchers, needs now arise to examine researchers' abilities to trust the participants. This analysis has several critical implications for future practice, policy, and research.

0 comments Cited 156 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Vaccine

Title: Vaccine

Publisher: Elsevier BV

ISSN (Electronic): 1873-2518

ISSN (Print): 0264-410X

Publication date (Electronic): Oct 03 2024

Volume: 42

Issue: 23

Affiliations

[1 ] University of South Alabama, College of Medicine at Mobile, Alabama.

[2 ] University of South Alabama, Mitchell Cancer Institute. Electronic address: agburch@health.southalabama.edu.

[3 ] University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama.

[4 ] University of South Alabama, Mitchell Cancer Institute.

[5 ] University of South Alabama, College of Medicine at Mobile, Alabama. Electronic address: Cldaniel@health.southalabama.edu.

Article

Publisher Item ID: S0264-410X(24)00673-X

DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.014

PubMed ID: 38853035

SO-VID: ed70d65d-06f6-4fa4-bf88-53605dfb80ae

History

Keywords: Immunization,Vaccination,Human papillomavirus,Hesitancy,HPV,COVID-19

Data availability:

Keywords: Immunization, Vaccination, Human papillomavirus, Hesitancy, HPV, COVID-19

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.