5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists.

      Journal of personality assessment
      Adult, Child, Data Collection, Female, Forensic Psychiatry, statistics & numerical data, Humans, Insanity Defense, Male, Malingering, diagnosis, psychology, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychology, Clinical, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Societies, Scientific, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Clinical psychologists are frequently called on to testify in court regarding mental health issues in civil or criminal cases. One of the legal criteria by which admissibility of testimony is determined includes whether the testimony is based on methods that have gained "general acceptance" in their field. In this study, we sought to evaluate the psychological tests used in forensic assessments by members of the American Psychology-Law Society Division of the American Psychological Association, and by diplomates in the American Board of Forensic Psychology. We present test results from this survey, based on 152 respondents, for forensic evaluations conducted with adults using multiscale inventories, single-scale tests, unstructured personality tests, cognitive and/or intellectual tests, neuropsychological tests, risk assessment and psychopathy instruments, sex offender risk assessment instruments, competency or sanity-related instruments, and instruments used to evaluate malingering. In addition, we provide findings for psychological testing involving child-related forensic issues.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking.

          E. Berg (1948)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Comments

                Comment on this article