13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Triaxial Orbit-based Dynamical Modeling of Galaxies with Supermassive Black Holes and an Application to Massive Elliptical Galaxy NGC 1453

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most stellar-dynamical determinations of the masses of nearby supermassive black holes (SMBHs) have been obtained with the orbit superposition technique under the assumption of axisymmetry. However, few galaxies -- in particular massive early-type galaxies -- obey exact axisymmetry. Here we present a revised orbit superposition code and a new approach for dynamically determining the intrinsic shapes and mass parameters of triaxial galaxies based on spatially-resolved stellar kinematic data. The triaxial TriOS code described here corrects a major error in the original van den Bosch et al. (2008) code that gives rise to incorrect projections for most orbits in triaxial models and can significantly impact parameter search results. The revised code also contains significant improvements in orbit sampling, mass constraints, and run time. Furthermore, we introduce two new parameter searching strategies -- a new set of triaxial shape parameters and a novel grid-free sampling technique -- that together lead to a remarkable gain in efficiency in locating the best-fit model. We apply the updated code and search method to NGC~1453, a fast-rotating massive elliptical galaxy. A full 6D parameter search finds \(p=b/a=0.933^{+0.014}_{-0.015}\) and \(q=c/a=0.779\pm0.012\) for the intrinsic axis ratios and \(T=0.33\pm0.06\) for the triaxiality parameter. Despite the deviations from axisymmetry, the best-fit SMBH mass, stellar mass-to-light ratio, and dark matter enclosed mass for NGC~1453 are consistent with the axisymmetric results. More comparisons between axisymmetric and triaxial modeling are needed before drawing general conclusions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          12 November 2021
          Article
          2111.06904
          43b7ccfd-b2f0-427d-a1e4-b53130371049

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          19 pages, 8 figures, submitted to ApJ
          astro-ph.GA

          Galaxy astrophysics
          Galaxy astrophysics

          Comments

          Comment on this article