For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
57
views
59
references
 Top references
cited by
182
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      3,455
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review.

      Author(s): , , ,
      Publication date Created:
      Publication date (Print):
      Journal: Journal of Applied Psychology
      Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement

          D Kerr, John Jermier (1978)
          Article 0 comments Cited 343 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions

            Roseanne Foti, Robert G Lord, Christy de Vader (1984)
            Article 0 comments Cited 282 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.

              Jack Block (1995)
              The 5-factor approach (FFA) to personality description has been represented as a comprehensive and compelling rubric for assessment. In this article, various misgivings about the FFA are delineated. The algorithmic method of factor analysis may not provide dimensions that are incisive. The "discovery" of the five factors may be influenced by unrecognized constraints on the variable sets analyzed. Lexical analyses are based on questionable conceptual and methodological assumptions, and have achieved uncertain results. The questionnaire version of the FFA has not demonstrated the special merits and sufficiencies of the five factors settled upon. Serious uncertainties have arisen in regard to the claimed 5-factor structure and the substantive meanings of the factors. Some implications of these problems are drawn.
              Article 0 comments Cited 280 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Journal of Applied Psychology
                Abbreviated Title: Journal of Applied Psychology
                Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
                ISSN (Electronic): 1939-1854
                ISSN (Print): 0021-9010
                Publication date Created: 2002
                Publication date (Print): 2002
                Volume: 87
                Issue: 4
                Pages: 765-780
                Article
                DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
                SO-VID: e57f336d-1c9b-4547-8be5-341ad9babe02
                Copyright © © 2002
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content3,455

                See all similar

                Cited by386

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors500

                See all reference authors