2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between maternal adiposity measures and adverse maternal outcomes of pregnancy: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Maternal obesity increases pregnancy‐related risks. Women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m 2 are considered to be at risk and should receive additional care, although approximately half will have uncomplicated pregnancies. This systematic review aimed to identify early pregnancy measures of adiposity associated with adverse maternal health outcomes. Searches included six databases, reference lists, citations, and contacting authors. Screening and quality assessment were carried out by two authors independently. Random effects meta‐analysis and narrative synthesis were conducted. Seventy studies were included with a pooled sample of 89,588 women. Meta‐analysis showed significantly increased odds of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with higher waist circumference (WC) categories (1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 1.88) and per unit increase in WC (1.31, 95% CI 1.03, 1.67). Women with GDM had higher WC than controls (mean difference [MD] 6.18 cm, 95% CI 3.92, 8.44). WC was significantly associated with hypertensive disorders, delivery‐related outcomes, metabolic syndrome, and composite pregnancy outcomes. Waist to hip ratio was significantly associated with GDM, hypertensive disorders, and delivery‐related outcomes. Fat mass, neck circumference, skinfolds, and visceral fat were significantly associated with adverse outcomes, although limited data were available. Our findings identify the need to explore how useful adiposity measures are at predicting risk in pregnancy, compared with BMI, to direct care to women with the greatest need.

          Related collections

          Most cited references111

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nicola.heslehurst@ncl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Obes Rev
                Obes Rev
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X
                OBR
                Obesity Reviews
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1467-7881
                1467-789X
                25 April 2022
                July 2022
                : 23
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1111/obr.v23.7 )
                : e13449
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Population Health Sciences Institute Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Nutritional Sciences King's College London London UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
                [ 4 ] Independent Information Specialist Ottawa Ontario Canada
                [ 5 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada
                [ 6 ] University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dr Nicola Heslehurst, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

                Email: nicola.heslehurst@ 123456ncl.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-2319
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-7622
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-0492
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1834-2696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-1506
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-2124
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-5354
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-4150
                Article
                OBR13449
                10.1111/obr.13449
                9285432
                35467075
                cbbfb550-9ee3-4155-8d12-f1cea8338872
                © 2022 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 March 2022
                : 13 January 2022
                : 15 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 14, Words: 13308
                Funding
                Funded by: NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria
                Award ID: NIHR200173
                Funded by: NIHR Academy
                Award ID: CDF‐2019‐11‐ST2‐0011
                Categories
                Obesity/Pregnancy Outcomes
                Obesity/Pregnancy Outcomes
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:15.07.2022

                Medicine
                adiposity,maternal,obesity,pregnancy
                Medicine
                adiposity, maternal, obesity, pregnancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article