2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Women’s and men’s experiences with participative decision-making at workplace and organizational levels

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The concept of participative decision-making (PDM) has been well established as a positive organizational factor, and has recently gained attention as a measure of gender inclusivity in the workplace. However, findings regarding gender differences in the experiences of PDM are inconclusive. This study hypothesized that women perceive themselves as less influential than men at the organizational level rather than at the workplace level. Furthermore, the study explored whether these assumed gender differences depend on the gender typicality of occupational positions and professions. We expected gender differences to be more pronounced for male-typed positions and professions (e.g., leadership, engineer) compared to non-male-typed occupational positions and professions (e.g., non-leadership, nurse).

          Methods

          Data on experiences with participative decision-making at the workplace and organizational levels were drawn from a large representative Swedish survey ( N = 10,500; 60% women).

          Results

          Results showed that women experienced being less influential than men at the organizational level, whereas the experiences of women and men did not differ at the workplace level. The gender difference at the organizational level was not related to the gender typicality of position and profession.

          Discussion

          The findings highlight the importance of the inclusion of both women and men in strategic, large-scale decisions for achieving gender equality at work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

          A role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders proposes that perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles leads to 2 forms of prejudice: (a) perceiving women less favorably than men as potential occupants of leadership roles and (b) evaluating behavior that fulfills the prescriptions of a leader role less favorably when it is enacted by a woman. One consequence is that attitudes are less positive toward female than male leaders and potential leaders. Other consequences are that it is more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles. Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that these consequences occur, especially in situations that heighten perceptions of incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Gender, Status, and Leadership

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Gender stereotypes and workplace bias

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                01 February 2024
                2023
                : 14
                : 1240117
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Stockholm University , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Meni Koslowsky, Ariel University, Israel

                Reviewed by: Andreas Müller, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

                Robert Lundmark, Umeå University, Sweden

                *Correspondence: Clara Plückelmann, clara.pluckelmann@ 123456psychology.su.se
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240117
                10867161
                38362525
                397addd3-a7be-4e7e-a0c7-250b7e3657dd
                Copyright © 2024 Plückelmann, Gustafsson Sendén, Bernhard-Oettel, Leineweber and Sczesny.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 June 2023
                : 21 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 53, Pages: 11, Words: 7321
                Funding
                This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 953326. The study utilized data from the REWHARD consortium supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR; grant number 2017–00624).
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Organizational Psychology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                participative decision-making,gender equality,leadership,gender stereotypes,gender roles

                Comments

                Comment on this article