88
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Electronic Cigarette and JUUL Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults

      research-article
      , PhD, MPH 1 , 2 , 3 , , , MSPH 1 , , MPP, MA 1 , , MS 1 , , PhD 1 , , PhD 1 , 2
      JAMA Pediatrics
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study analyzes self-reported use and risk factors of electronic cigarettes and other tobacco products by adolescents and young adults in the United States.

          Key Points

          Question

          How has the use of JUUL among adolescents and young adults changed from 2018 to 2019?

          Findings

          In this nationally representative cohort study of adolescents and young adults, with 14 379 participants in 2018 and 12 114 participants in 2019, JUUL use increased in every age group but was highest among those aged 18 to 20 years and 21 to 24 years.

          Meaning

          Findings of this study suggest that urgent action is needed to curb youth use of electronic cigarettes and prevent a new generation from becoming addicted to nicotine.

          Abstract

          Importance

          The increasing use rates of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) among young people in the United States have been largely associated with the emergence of high-nicotine-delivery device JUUL. Relevant data are needed to monitor e-cigarette, specifically JUUL, use to help inform intervention efforts.

          Objective

          To estimate the prevalence, patterns, and factors associated over time with e-cigarette use among adolescents and younger adults in the United States.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          Two nationally representative longitudinal samples of adolescents and younger adults aged 15 to 34 years were drawn from the Truth Longitudinal Cohort, a national, probability-based cohort. Participants in this cohort were recruited through address-based sampling, and subsamples were recruited from a probability-based online panel. The present cohort study used data from follow-up online surveys, specifically, wave 7 (N = 14 379; collected from February 15, 2018, to May 25, 2018) and wave 8 (N = 12 114; collected from February 10, 2019, to May 17, 2019). Respondents reported their use of e-cigarettes, JUUL, and combustible tobacco products as well as their harm perceptions, household smoking status, sensation-seeking, friends’ e-cigarette use, and demographic information.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The main outcomes were ever and current (past 30 days) JUUL use. χ 2 Analyses assessed differences in JUUL use by psychosocial and demographic characteristics. Logistic regression models identified the significant factors associated with wave 8 ever and current JUUL use among wave 7 e-cigarette–naive participants.

          Results

          A total of 14 379 participants (mean [SD] age, 24.3 [0.09] years; 8142 female [51.0%]) were included in wave 7 and 12 114 (mean [SD] age, 24.5 [0.10] years; 6835 female [50.1%]) in wave 8. JUUL use statistically significantly increased from wave 7 to wave 8 among ever users (6.0% [n = 1105] to 13.5% [2111]; P < .001) and current users (3.3% [680] to 6.1% [993]; P < .001). JUUL use increased among every age group and was highest among those aged 18 to 20 years (23.9% [491] ever users and 12.8% [340] current users) and 21 to 24 years (18.1% [360] ever users and 8.2% [207] current users). Users reported a higher prevalence of frequent use in wave 8 compared with wave 7 (37.6% vs 26.1%; P < .01). Significant factors associated with future JUUL use among e-cigarette–naive participants included younger age, combustible tobacco use, lower harm perceptions, sensation seeking, and friends’ e-cigarette use.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This study found that the e-cigarette device JUUL appears to be associated with the youth e-cigarette epidemic, attracting new users and facilitating frequent use with their highly addictive nicotine content and appealing flavors. Findings of this study underscore the critical need for increased e-cigarette product regulation at the federal, state, and local levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Vital Signs: Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2011–2018

          Introduction Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States; nearly all tobacco product use begins during youth and young adulthood. Methods CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National Cancer Institute analyzed data from the 2011–2018 National Youth Tobacco Surveys to estimate tobacco product use among U.S. middle and high school students. Prevalence estimates of current (past 30-day) use of seven tobacco products were assessed; differences over time were analyzed using multivariable regression (2011–2018) or t-test (2017–2018). Results In 2018, current use of any tobacco product was reported by 27.1% of high school students (4.04 million) and 7.2% of middle school students (840,000); electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) were the most commonly used product among high school (20.8%; 3.05 million) and middle school (4.9%; 570,000) students. Use of any tobacco product overall did not change significantly during 2011–2018 among either school level. During 2017–2018, current use of any tobacco product increased 38.3% (from 19.6% to 27.1%) among high school students and 28.6% (from 5.6% to 7.2%) among middle school students; e-cigarette use increased 77.8% (from 11.7% to 20.8%) among high school students and 48.5% (from 3.3% to 4.9%) among middle school students. Conclusions and Implications for Public Health Practice A considerable increase in e-cigarette use among U.S. youths, coupled with no change in use of other tobacco products during 2017–2018, has erased recent progress in reducing overall tobacco product use among youths. The sustained implementation of comprehensive tobacco control strategies, in coordination with Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco products, can prevent and reduce the use of all forms of tobacco products among U.S. youths.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2011–2015

              Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States; if current smoking rates continue, 5.6 million Americans aged <18 years who are alive today are projected to die prematurely from smoking-related disease. Tobacco use and addiction mostly begin during youth and young adulthood. CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analyzed data from the 2011-2015 National Youth Tobacco Surveys (NYTS) to determine the prevalence and trends of current (past 30-day) use of seven tobacco product types (cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco, electronic cigarettes [e-cigarettes], hookahs [water pipes used to smoke tobacco], pipe tobacco, and bidis [small imported cigarettes wrapped in a tendu leaf]) among U.S. middle (grades 6-8) and high (grades 9-12) school students. In 2015, e-cigarettes were the most commonly used tobacco product among middle (5.3%) and high (16.0%) school students. During 2011-2015, significant increases in current use of e-cigarettes and hookahs occurred among middle and high school students, whereas current use of conventional tobacco products, such as cigarettes and cigars decreased, resulting in no change in overall tobacco product use. During 2014-2015, current use of e-cigarettes increased among middle school students, whereas current use of hookahs decreased among high school students; in contrast, no change was observed in use of hookahs among middle school students, use of e-cigarettes among high school students, or use of cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco, pipe tobacco, or bidis among middle and high school students. In 2015, an estimated 4.7 million middle and high school students were current tobacco product users, and, therefore, continue to be exposed to harmful tobacco product constituents, including nicotine. Nicotine exposure during adolescence, a critical period for brain development, can cause addiction, might harm brain development, and could lead to sustained tobacco product use among youths. Comprehensive and sustained strategies are warranted to prevent and reduce the use of all tobacco products among U.S. youths.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Pediatr
                JAMA Pediatr
                JAMA Pediatr
                JAMA Pediatrics
                American Medical Association
                2168-6203
                2168-6211
                March 2020
                21 January 2020
                2 March 2020
                21 January 2021
                : 174
                : 3
                : 277-286
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia
                [2 ]Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
                [3 ]College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 9, 2019.
                Published Online: January 21, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5436
                Correction: This article was corrected on March 2, 2020, to fix some incorrect percentages in Table 1.
                Corresponding Author: Donna M. Vallone, PhD, MPH, Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, 900 G St NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20001 ( dvallone@ 123456truthinitiative.org ).
                Author Contributions: Mr Xiao had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Vallone, Cuccia, Briggs, Hair.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Vallone, Cuccia, Xiao, Schillo, Hair.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Cuccia, Briggs, Xiao, Schillo, Hair.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Vallone, Cuccia, Hair, Briggs.
                Statistical analysis: Xiao, Hair.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Vallone, Cuccia, Briggs, Hair.
                Supervision: Schillo, Hair.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by Truth Initiative.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: Robin Koval, MBA, and Dave Dobbins, JD, MPH, of Truth Initiative provided careful review of the manuscript. These individuals received no compensation for their contributions.
                Article
                PMC6990671 PMC6990671 6990671 poi190095
                10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5436
                6990671
                31961395
                974c0c51-3ef0-4547-8169-e0508c9ef7e7
                Copyright 2020 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
                History
                : 17 September 2019
                : 9 November 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content287

                Cited by53

                Most referenced authors208