17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment.

          Materials and methods: We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models.

          Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6–39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20–21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20–40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4–42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16–20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8–24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84–30.37, p = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size.

          Conclusion: This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Baseline Biomarkers for Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab.

          Biomarkers for outcome after immune-checkpoint blockade are strongly needed as these may influence individual treatment selection or sequence. We aimed to identify baseline factors associated with overall survival (OS) after pembrolizumab treatment in melanoma patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Frequent PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma: potential opportunities for immunotherapeutic approaches.

            Despite aggressive multimodal therapy, locally advanced and/or metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, indicating a need for new therapeutic options. Given the emerging clinical utility of immunotherapeutics, we sought to assess the incidence and potential clinical significance of PD-L1 expression in penile SqCC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment for Metastatic Penile Cancer After First-line Chemotherapy Failure: Analysis of Response and Survival Outcomes

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                20 December 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 487
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples Naples, Italy
                [2] 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno Portici, Italy
                [3] 3Department of Oncology, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, Canada
                [4] 4Unità Operativa Sperimentazioni Cliniche Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale ‘Antonio Cardarelli’ Naples, Italy
                [5] 5Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano Grottaferrata, Italy
                [6] 6Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester, MN, USA
                [7] 7Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [8] 8Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Cancer Center, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [9] 9Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [10] 10Section of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center Birmingham, AL, USA
                [11] 11Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology Milan, Italy
                [12] 12Ios and Coleman Medicina Futura Medical Center Naples, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Giuseppe Giaccone, Georgetown University, USA

                Reviewed by: Jian Lu, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Victor C. Kok, Asia University, Taiwan

                *Correspondence: Giuseppe Di Lorenzo dilorengiuseppe@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work.

                ‡These two authors share senior authorship.

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2016.00487
                5168461
                ca56fe8d-ece4-49cd-a3e5-08b8ada1276f
                Copyright © 2016 Buonerba, Di Lorenzo, Pond, Cartenì, Scagliarini, Rozzi, Quevedo, Dorff, Nappi, Lanzetta, Pagliaro, Eigl, Naik, Ferro, Galdiero, De Placido and Sonpavde.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 September 2016
                : 28 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 22, Pages: 7, Words: 5237
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                penile squamous cell carcinoma,salvage,prognosis,classification

                Comments

                Comment on this article