14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children

      systematic-review
      , , ,
      Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group
      The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
      John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In nephrotic syndrome protein leaks from the blood to the urine through the glomeruli resulting in hypoproteinaemia and generalised oedema. While most children with nephrotic syndrome respond to corticosteroids, 80% experience a relapsing course. Corticosteroids have reduced the mortality rate to around 3%. However corticosteroids have well recognised potentially serious adverse effects such as obesity, poor growth, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and behavioural disturbances. This is an update of a review first published in 2000 and updated in 2003, 2005 and 2007.

          Objectives

          The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of different corticosteroid regimens in children with steroid‐sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). The benefits and harms of therapy were studied in two groups of children 1) children in their initial episode of SSNS, and 2) children who experience a relapsing course of SSNS.

          Search methods

          We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 26 February 2015 through contact with the Trials Search Co‐ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

          Selection criteria

          Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) performed in children (three months to 18 years) in their initial or subsequent episode of SSNS, comparing different durations, total doses or other dose strategies using any corticosteroid agent.

          Data collection and analysis

          Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

          Main results

          Ten new studies were identified so a total of 34 studies (3033 total participants) were included in the 2015 review update. The risk of bias attributes were frequently poorly performed. Low risk of bias was reported in 18 studies for sequence generation, 16 studies for allocation concealment, seven for performance and detection bias, 15 for incomplete reporting and 16 for selective reporting. Three months or more of prednisone significantly reduced the risk of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) (6 studies, 582 children: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.00) and of relapse by 12 to 24 months (8 studies, 741 children: RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.00) compared with two months. Five or six months of prednisone significantly reduced the risk of relapse (7 studies, 763 children: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85) but not FRNS (5 studies, 591 children: RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.22) compared with three months. However there was significant heterogeneity in the analyses. Subgroup analysis stratified by risk of bias for allocation concealment showed that the risk for FRNS did not differ significantly between two or three months of prednisone and three to six months among studies at low risk of bias but was significantly reduced in extended duration studies compared with two or three months in studies at high risk or unclear risk of bias. There were no significant differences in the risk of adverse effects between extended duration and two or three months of prednisone. Four studies found that in children with FRNS, daily prednisone during viral infections compared with alternate‐day prednisone or no treatment significantly reduced the rate of relapse.

          Authors' conclusions

          In this 2015 update the addition of three well‐designed studies has changed the conclusion of this review. Studies of long versus shorter duration of corticosteroids have heterogeneous treatment effects, with the older high risk of bias studies tending to over‐estimate the effect of longer course therapy, compared with more recently published low risk of bias studies. Among studies at low risk of bias, there was no significant difference in the risk for FRNS between prednisone given for two or three months and longer durations or total dose of therapy indicating that there is no benefit of increasing the duration of prednisone beyond two or three months in the initial episode of SSNS.

          The risk of relapse in children with FRNS is reduced by the administration of daily prednisone at onset of an upper respiratory tract or viral infection. Three additional studies have increased the evidence supporting this conclusion. This management strategy may be considered for children with FRNS. A paucity of data on prednisone use in relapsing nephrotic syndrome remains. In particular there are no data from RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of prolonged courses of low dose alternate‐day prednisone although this management strategy is recommended in current guidelines.

          Plain language summary

          Corticosteroid therapy for children with nephrotic syndrome

          Nephrotic syndrome is a condition where the kidneys leak protein from the blood into the urine. When it is untreated, children can often die from infections. Most children, with nephrotic syndrome, respond to corticosteroid drugs (prednisone, prednisolone) reducing the risk of serious infection. However they usually have repeat episodes, which are often triggered by viral infections. Corticosteroid drugs can have serious side effects.

          We looked at evidence from 34 studies enrolling 3033 children. Fourteen of 21 studies, in children with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome, evaluated prednisone for two or three months compared with longer durations. Thirteen studies evaluated different corticosteroid regimens in children with frequently relapsing disease (FRNS). Studies were of variable methodological quality with only about half of the studies at low risk of bias.

          Among studies of long versus shorter duration of prednisone, older studies at high or unclear risk of bias tended to over‐estimate the effect of longer course therapy compared with new studies at low risk of bias. Studies at low risk of bias found no significant differences in the risk of relapse or the development of FRNS between prednisone given for three to six months compared with two or three months. Therefore there is no benefit of increasing the duration of prednisone beyond two or three months in the initial episode of SSNS.

          Based on four studies in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome, prednisone given for five to seven days at the onset of a viral infection reduces the risk of relapse.

          This review updates information previously published in 2000, 2003, 2005 and 2007. The addition of three new studies evaluating different durations of prednisone in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome has changed the conclusions expressed in previous versions of this review

          Related collections

          Most cited references139

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Empirical Evidence of Bias

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

              Few meta-analyses of randomised trials assess the quality of the studies included. Yet there is increasing evidence that trial quality can affect estimates of intervention efficacy. We investigated whether different methods of quality assessment provide different estimates of intervention efficacy evaluated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We randomly selected 11 meta-analyses that involved 127 RCTs on the efficacy of interventions used for circulatory and digestive diseases, mental health, and pregnancy and childbirth. We replicated all the meta-analyses using published data from the primary studies. The quality of reporting of all 127 clinical trials was assessed by means of component and scale approaches. To explore the effects of quality on the quantitative results, we examined the effects of different methods of incorporating quality scores (sensitivity analysis and quality weights) on the results of the meta-analyses. The quality of trials was low. Masked assessments provided significantly higher scores than unmasked assessments (mean 2.74 [SD 1.10] vs 2.55 [1.20]). Low-quality trials (score 2), were associated with an increased estimate of benefit of 34% (ratio of odds ratios [ROR] 0.66 [95% CI 0.52-0.83]). Trials that used inadequate allocation concealment, compared with those that used adequate methods, were also associated with an increased estimate of benefit (37%; ROR=0.63 [0.45-0.88]). The average treatment benefit was 39% (odds ratio [OR] 0.61 [0.57-0.65]) for all trials, 52% (OR 0.48 [0.43-0.54]) for low-quality trials, and 29% (OR 0.71 [0.65-0.77]) for high-quality trials. Use of all the trial scores as quality weights reduced the effects to 35% (OR 0.65 [0.59-0.71]) and resulted in the least statistical heterogeneity. Studies of low methodological quality in which the estimate of quality is incorporated into the meta-analyses can alter the interpretation of the benefit of intervention, whether a scale or component approach is used in the assessment of trial quality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                elisabeth.hodson@health.nsw.gov.au
                Journal
                Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                Cochrane Database Syst Rev
                14651858
                10.1002/14651858
                The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                1469-493X
                18 March 2015
                March 2015
                16 September 2015
                : 2015
                : 3
                : CD001533
                Affiliations
                The Children's Hospital at Westmead deptDepartment of Nephrology Locked Bag 4001 Westmead NSW Australia 2145
                The University of Sydney deptSydney School of Public Health Sydney NSW Australia 2006
                The Children's Hospital at Westmead deptCochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research Westmead NSW Australia 2145
                Article
                PMC7025788 PMC7025788 7025788 CD001533.pub5 CD001533
                10.1002/14651858.CD001533.pub5
                7025788
                25785660
                36a89f44-f9c9-4cb0-ac3e-381cc3aeda62
                Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                History
                Categories
                Child health
                Kidney disease
                CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

                Comments

                Comment on this article