26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does a strategy based on individualized blood pressure management reduce postoperative complications among high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial involving 292 patients, most of whom underwent abdominal surgery, an individualized management strategy of targeting a systolic blood pressure within 10% of the patient’s normal resting value, compared with standard practice, resulted in significantly lower rates of postoperative organ dysfunction (38.1% vs 51.7%, respectively).

          Meaning

          Among patients undergoing abdominal surgery, an individualized blood pressure management strategy during surgery tailored to individual patient physiology may improve postoperative outcomes.

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial compares the effects of an individualized blood pressure management strategy vs standard blood pressure management strategy on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Perioperative hypotension is associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality, but the appropriate management strategy remains uncertain.

          Objective

          To evaluate whether an individualized blood pressure management strategy tailored to individual patient physiology could reduce postoperative organ dysfunction.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          The Intraoperative Norepinephrine to Control Arterial Pressure (INPRESS) study was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in 9 French university and nonuniversity hospitals. Adult patients (n = 298) at increased risk of postoperative complications with a preoperative acute kidney injury risk index of class III or higher (indicating moderate to high risk of postoperative kidney injury) undergoing major surgery lasting 2 hours or longer under general anesthesia were enrolled from December 4, 2012, through August 28, 2016 (last follow-up, September 28, 2016).

          Interventions

          Individualized management strategy aimed at achieving a systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 10% of the reference value (ie, patient’s resting SBP) or standard management strategy of treating SBP less than 80 mm Hg or lower than 40% from the reference value during and for 4 hours following surgery.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was a composite of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and dysfunction of at least 1 organ system of the renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and neurologic systems by day 7 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, durations of ICU and hospital stay, adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 30 days after surgery.

          Results

          Among 298 patients who were randomized, 292 patients completed the trial (mean [SD] age, 70 [7] years; 44 [15.1%] women) and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome event occurred in 56 of 147 patients (38.1%) assigned to the individualized treatment strategy vs 75 of 145 patients (51.7%) assigned to the standard treatment strategy (relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.94; P = .02; absolute risk difference, −14%, 95% CI, −25% to −2%). Sixty-eight patients (46.3%) in the individualized treatment group and 92 (63.4%) in the standard treatment group had postoperative organ dysfunction by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.84; P = .001). There were no significant between-group differences in severe adverse events or 30-day mortality.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Among patients predominantly undergoing abdominal surgery who were at increased postoperative risk, management targeting an individualized systolic blood pressure, compared with standard management, reduced the risk of postoperative organ dysfunction.

          Trial Registration

          clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01536470

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          On behalf of : for the INPRESS Study Group
          Journal
          JAMA
          JAMA
          JAMA
          JAMA
          American Medical Association
          0098-7484
          1538-3598
          27 September 2017
          10 October 2017
          10 October 2017
          10 April 2018
          : 318
          : 14
          : 1346-1357
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Département de Médecine Périopératoire, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
          [2 ]Section d’Anesthésie and Département Anesthésie et Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes, Nîmes, France
          [3 ]Département Anesthésie et Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens, Amiens, France
          [4 ]Service Anesthésie et Réanimation, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Université Aix Marseille, Marseille, France
          [5 ]Service d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
          [6 ]Département Anesthésie-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France
          [7 ]Service Anesthésie et Réanimation, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France
          [8 ]Anesthésie et Réanimation, Clinique du Parc, Castelnau-Le-Lez, France
          [9 ]Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France
          [10 ]Biostatistic Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand, Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Clermont-Ferrand, France
          [11 ]Département Anesthésie et Réanimation B, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, and INSERM U-1046, Montpellier, France
          Author notes
          Article Information
          Corresponding Author: Emmanuel Futier, MD, PhD, Département de Médecine Périopératoire, Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Estaing, 1 place Lucie Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France ( efutier@ 123456chu-clermontferrand.fr ).
          Group Information: The INPRESS Study Group investigators are listed at the end of this article.
          Accepted for Publication: August 30, 2017.
          Published Online: September 27, 2017. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14172
          Author Contributions: Drs Futier and Jaber had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
          Concept and design: Futier, Lefrant, Julia, Tavernier, Bazin, Constantin, Pereira, Jaber.
          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Futier, Lefrant, Guinot, Godet, Lorne, Cuvillon, Bertran, Leone, Pastene, Piriou, Molliex, Albanese, Julia, Imhoff, Constantin, Pereira, Jaber.
          Drafting of the manuscript: Futier, Cuvillon, Leone, Tavernier, Pereira, Jaber.
          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Futier, Lefrant, Guinot, Godet, Lorne, Bertran, Leone, Pastene, Piriou, Molliex, Albanese, Julia, Tavernier, Imhoff, Bazin, Constantin, Pereira, Jaber.
          Statistical analysis: Pereira.
          Obtained funding: Futier, Julia.
          Administrative, technical, or material support: Futier, Lefrant, Guinot, Godet, Cuvillon, Leone, Piriou, Julia, Bazin, Jaber.
          Supervision: Futier, Godet, Bertran, Julia, Constantin, Jaber.
          Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Futier reported receiving consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Dräger; lecture fees from Dräger, GE Healthcare, Fresenius Kabi, and Fisher and Paykel Healthcare; and travel reimbursement from Fisher and Paykel Healthcare. Dr Leone reported receiving personal fees from LFB and Augettant and nonfinancial support from MSD. Dr Julia reported being an inventor on a patent owned by Aguettant. Dr Bazin reported receiving honoraria for expertise from General Electric, Ambu, and MSD and a grant from General Electric. No other disclosures were reported.
          Funding/Support: This study was funded by the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand and was supported in part by a grant from Aguettant.
          Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The steering committee designed the study, vouches for protocol adherence, and made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All drugs used in the study were purchased from the manufacturers, who had no role in the study.
          Intraoperative Norepinephrine to Control Arterial Pressure (INPRESS) Study Group Investigators: The INPRESS Study Group investigators are as follows: Steering Committee: Emmanuel Futier, MD, PhD (principal investigator; Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand), Jean-Yves Lefrant, MD, PhD (project scientist; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes, l’Hôpital Carémeau), Samir Jaber, MD, PhD (project scientist; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Hôpital Saint-Eloi), Jean-Michel Julia, MD (project scientist; Clinique du Parc), Jean-Etienne Bazin, MD, PhD (chair; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand), and Jean-Michel Constantin, MD, PhD (vice chair; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand); Scientific Committee: Emmanuel Futier, MD, PhD (Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand), Samir Jaber, MD, PhD (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Hôpital Saint-Eloi), Jean-Yves Lefrant, MD, PhD (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes, l’Hôpital Carémeau), Marc Leone, MD, PhD (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord), Matthieu Biais, MD, PhD (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin), and Benoit Tavernier, MD, PhD (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille); Trial Management Committee: Emmanuel Futier, MD, PhD, Jean-Yves Lefrant, MD, PhD, and Samir Jaber, MD, PhD; Trial Monitoring and Research Coordinators: Dominique Morand, Christine Rolhion, and Justine Bourdier (Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand); Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: Karim Asehnoune, MD, PhD (Nantes, France), Catherine Paugam-Burtz, MD, PhD (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France), and Nicolas Molinari, PhD (biostatistician; Montpellier, France); Statistical and Data Coordination: Bruno Pereira, PhD; Writing Committee: Emmanuel Futier, MD, PhD, Samir Jaber, MD, PhD, and Jean-Michel Constantin, MD, PhD; and INPRESS Participating Clinical Centers: Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand (Antoine Petit, MD, Sebastien Christophe, MD, Marie Vignaud, MD, Oana Cherbis, MD, Adeline Gerard, MD, and Emmanuel Futier, MD, PhD), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud (Vincent Piriou, MD, PhD, Etienne Imhoff, MD, Camille Parent, MD, and Aline Steghens, MD), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord (Marc Leone, MD, PhD, Marie-France Brunier Mercier, MD, Malik Haddam, MD, Ludovic Richiardone, MD, Clement Brun, MD, and Remy Bardin, MD), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception (Jacques Albanese, MD, PhD), Clinique du Parc (Matthieu Ponrouch, MD, and Jean-Michel Julia, MD), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Etienne (Serge Molliex, MD, PhD), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes, l’Hôpital Carémeau (Jean-Yves Lefrant, MD, PhD, Philippe Cuvillon, MD, PhD, and Sebastien Bertran, MD), Institut du Cancer Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier (Gilles Leclerc, MD, and Christian Popescu Horatiu, MD), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens (Emmanuel Lorne, MD, PhD, Pierre-Gregoire Guinot, MD, PhD, Bruno de Broca, MD, and Marc-Olivier Fischer, MD, PhD).
          Additional Contributions: We thank all the patients who participated in the study; the clinical and research staff at all trial sites, without whose assistance the INPRESS study would never have been completed; and the monitors of the trial. Dominique Morand (Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand) coordinated the monitoring of the trial and Mervyn Singer, MD (Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London), provided valuable advice during the preparation of the manuscript; they received no compensation.
          Article
          PMC5710560 PMC5710560 5710560 joi170111
          10.1001/jama.2017.14172
          5710560
          28973220
          9d2602ab-c127-449d-b3ff-8539005f5f47
          Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
          History
          : 28 May 2017
          : 26 August 2017
          : 30 August 2017
          Funding
          Funded by: University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand
          Funded by: Aguettant
          Categories
          Research
          Research
          Original Investigation
          Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
          Online First

          Comments

          Comment on this article