12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Loop extrusion as a mechanism for DNA damage repair foci formation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DNA Double-Strand Break (DSB) repair is essential to safeguard genome integrity. Upon DSBs, the ATM PI3K kinase rapidly triggers the establishment of megabase-sized, γH2AX-decorated chromatin domains which further act as seeds for the formation of DNA Damage Response (DDR) foci 1 . How these foci are rapidly assembled in order to establish a “repair-prone” environment within the nucleus is yet unclear. Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) are a key feature of 3D genome organization that compartmentalize transcription and replication, but little is known about their contribution to DNA repair processes 2, 3 . Here we found that TADs are functional units of the DDR, instrumental for the correct establishment of γH2AX/53BP1 chromatin domains in a manner that involves one-sided cohesin-mediated loop extrusion on both sides of the DSB. We propose a model whereby H2AX-containing nucleosomes are rapidly phosphorylated as they actively pass by DSB-anchored cohesin. Our work highlights the critical impact of chromosome conformation in the maintenance of genome integrity and provides the first example of a chromatin modification established by loop extrusion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains.

          The human genome folds to create thousands of intervals, called "contact domains," that exhibit enhanced contact frequency within themselves. "Loop domains" form because of tethering between two loci-almost always bound by CTCF and cohesin-lying on the same chromosome. "Compartment domains" form when genomic intervals with similar histone marks co-segregate. Here, we explore the effects of degrading cohesin. All loop domains are eliminated, but neither compartment domains nor histone marks are affected. Loss of loop domains does not lead to widespread ectopic gene activation but does affect a significant minority of active genes. In particular, cohesin loss causes superenhancers to co-localize, forming hundreds of links within and across chromosomes and affecting the regulation of nearby genes. We then restore cohesin and monitor the re-formation of each loop. Although re-formation rates vary greatly, many megabase-sized loops recovered in under an hour, consistent with a model where loop extrusion is rapid.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion.

            Topologically associating domains (TADs) are fundamental structural and functional building blocks of human interphase chromosomes, yet the mechanisms of TAD formation remain unclear. Here, we propose that loop extrusion underlies TAD formation. In this process, cis-acting loop-extruding factors, likely cohesins, form progressively larger loops but stall at TAD boundaries due to interactions with boundary proteins, including CTCF. Using polymer simulations, we show that this model produces TADs and finer-scale features of Hi-C data. Each TAD emerges from multiple loops dynamically formed through extrusion, contrary to typical illustrations of single static loops. Loop extrusion both explains diverse experimental observations-including the preferential orientation of CTCF motifs, enrichments of architectural proteins at TAD boundaries, and boundary deletion experiments-and makes specific predictions for the depletion of CTCF versus cohesin. Finally, loop extrusion has potentially far-ranging consequences for processes such as enhancer-promoter interactions, orientation-specific chromosomal looping, and compaction of mitotic chromosomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal

              Imaging and chromosome conformation capture studies have revealed several layers of chromosome organization, including segregation into megabase-large active and inactive compartments, and partitioning into sub-megabase domains (TADs). Yet, it remains unclear how these layers of organization form, interact with one another and impact genome functions. Here, we show that deletion of the cohesin-loading factor Nipbl, in mouse liver, leads to a dramatic reorganization of chromosomal folding. TADs and associated peaks vanish globally, even in the absence of transcriptional changes. In contrast, compartmental segregation is preserved and even reinforced. Strikingly, the disappearance of TADs unmasks a finer compartment structure that accurately reflects the underlying epigenetic landscape. These observations demonstrate that the 3D organization of the genome results from the interplay of two independent mechanisms: 1) cohesin-independent segregation of the genome into fine-scale compartments, defined by chromatin state; 2) cohesin-dependent formation of TADs, possibly by loop extrusion, which contributes to guide distant enhancers to their target genes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                26 January 2021
                01 February 2021
                17 February 2021
                17 August 2021
                : 590
                : 7847
                : 660-665
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology unit (MCD), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), UPS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
                [2 ]Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
                [3 ]CIRI – International Center for Infectiology Research, Inserm, U1111, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5308, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Univ Lyon, F-69007, Lyon, France
                [4 ]Laboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, INSERM U1293, CNRS UMR 5239, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69007 Lyon, France
                [5 ]Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Gif-sur-Yvette, France
                Author notes
                [* ]corresponding author: gaelle.legube@ 123456univ-tlse3.fr
                Article
                EMS114641
                10.1038/s41586-021-03193-z
                7116834
                33597753
                d010a6df-62ea-49ab-bbe5-307d57b9cbf9

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                cohesin,loop extrusion,dna double-strand breaks,γh2ax,dna damage response,topologically associated domains.

                Comments

                Comment on this article