26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Elimination of Aberrant DRG Circuitries in Sema3A Mutant Mice Leads to Extensive Neuronal Deficits

      research-article
      , , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Axon guidance molecules determine the pattern of neuronal circuits. Accuracy of the process is ensured by unknown mechanisms that correct early guidance errors. Since the time frame of error correction in Sema3A null mice partly overlaps with the period of naturally occurring cell death in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) development, we tested the hypothesis that apoptosis of misguided neurons enables error correction. We crossed BAX null mice, in which DRG apoptosis is blocked, with Sema3A null mice to induce errors. Analyses of these double-null mouse embryos showed that the elimination of abnormal projections is not blocked in the absence of BAX. Surprisingly however, there are fewer surviving neurons in Sema3A null or Sema3A/BAX double-null newborn mice than in wild-type mice. These results suggest that guidance errors are corrected by a BAX-independent cell death mechanism. Thus, aberrant axonal guidance may lead to reductions in neuronal numbers to suboptimal levels, perhaps increasing the likelihood of neuropathological consequences later in life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Life and death partners: apoptosis, autophagy and the cross-talk between them.

          It is not surprising that the demise of a cell is a complex well-controlled process. Apoptosis, the first genetically programmed death process identified, has been extensively studied and its contribution to the pathogenesis of disease well documented. Yet, apoptosis does not function alone to determine a cell's fate. More recently, autophagy, a process in which de novo-formed membrane-enclosed vesicles engulf and consume cellular components, has been shown to engage in a complex interplay with apoptosis. In some cellular settings, it can serve as a cell survival pathway, suppressing apoptosis, and in others, it can lead to death itself, either in collaboration with apoptosis or as a back-up mechanism when the former is defective. The molecular regulators of both pathways are inter-connected; numerous death stimuli are capable of activating either pathway, and both pathways share several genes that are critical for their respective execution. The cross-talk between apoptosis and autophagy is therefore quite complex, and sometimes contradictory, but surely critical to the overall fate of the cell. Furthermore, the cross-talk is a key factor in the outcome of death-related pathologies such as cancer, its development and treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cell death during development of the nervous system.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias.

              Bruce West (1999)
              The emergence of a new generation of stereological techniques for counting objects in histological sections has prompted a debate about whether or not these methods are better than previously available techniques when they are used to make estimates of the total numbers of neurons and synapses in a neural structure. During this debate, the concepts of an unbiased estimate and that of a precise estimate have often been confused. A full understanding of the distinction between these two separate aspects of an estimate is required in order to be able to appreciate the virtues of these new counting methods and to apply them correctly. This review intends to make the fundamental issues of this debate more clear, and describes (1) the fundamental differences between the newer design-based counting techniques and previously available assumption-based techniques, and (2) the distinction between an unbiased estimate and a precise estimate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                26 July 2013
                : 8
                : 7
                : e70085
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
                McGill University, Canada
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: OB ABZ. Performed the experiments: ABZ SS. Analyzed the data: ABZ SS OB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ABZ. Wrote the paper: OB ABZ.

                [¤]

                Current address: Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

                Article
                PONE-D-13-05388
                10.1371/journal.pone.0070085
                3724818
                23922915
                cac6c583-0db8-4225-a405-883ab15b8573
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 February 2013
                : 17 June 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                This work was supported by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation (grant number 350/07), Legacy Heritage Biomedical Science Partnership (grant number 1306/10) ( http://www.isf.org.il/) and the Ministry of Health (grant number 3000006210) ( http://www.health.gov.il/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Neurological System
                Neural Pathways
                Developmental Biology
                Cell Fate Determination
                Embryology
                Molecular Cell Biology
                Signal Transduction
                Signaling in Cellular Processes
                Apoptotic Signaling
                Neuroscience
                Developmental Neuroscience
                Neural Circuit Formation
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Molecular Neuroscience
                Neurobiology of Disease and Regeneration
                Neurochemistry

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article