43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating programmatic assessment in health care professions education in practice.

          Methods

          The authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ERIC to identify studies published since 2005 that reported empirical data on programmatic assessment. Characteristics of the included studies were extracted and synthesized, using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

          Results

          Twenty-seven studies were included, which used quantitative methods ( n = 10), qualitative methods ( n = 12) or mixed methods ( n = 5). Most studies were conducted in clinical settings (77.8%). Programmatic assessment was found to enable meaningful triangulation for robust decision-making and used as a catalyst for learning. However, several problems were identified, including overload in assessment information and the associated workload, counterproductive impact of using strict requirements and summative signals, lack of a shared understanding of the nature and purpose of programmatic assessment, and lack of supportive interpersonal relationships. Thematic analysis revealed that the success and challenges of programmatic assessment were best understood by the interplay between quantity and quality of assessment information, and the influence of social and personal aspects on assessment perceptions.

          Conclusion

          Although some of the evidence may seem compelling to support the effectiveness of programmatic assessment in practice, tensions will emerge when simultaneously stimulating the development of competencies and assessing its result. The identified factors and inferred strategies provide guidance for navigating these tensions.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The integrative review: updated methodology.

          The aim of this paper is to distinguish the integrative review method from other review methods and to propose methodological strategies specific to the integrative review method to enhance the rigour of the process. Recent evidence-based practice initiatives have increased the need for and the production of all types of reviews of the literature (integrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and qualitative reviews). The integrative review method is the only approach that allows for the combination of diverse methodologies (for example, experimental and non-experimental research), and has the potential to play a greater role in evidence-based practice for nursing. With respect to the integrative review method, strategies to enhance data collection and extraction have been developed; however, methods of analysis, synthesis, and conclusion drawing remain poorly formulated. A modified framework for research reviews is presented to address issues specific to the integrative review method. Issues related to specifying the review purpose, searching the literature, evaluating data from primary sources, analysing data, and presenting the results are discussed. Data analysis methods of qualitative research are proposed as strategies that enhance the rigour of combining diverse methodologies as well as empirical and theoretical sources in an integrative review. An updated integrative review method has the potential to allow for diverse primary research methods to become a greater part of evidence-based practice initiatives.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance

            G E Miller (1990)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes.

              We use a utility model to illustrate that, firstly, selecting an assessment method involves context-dependent compromises, and secondly, that assessment is not a measurement problem but an instructional design problem, comprising educational, implementation and resource aspects. In the model, assessment characteristics are differently weighted depending on the purpose and context of the assessment. Of the characteristics in the model, we focus on reliability, validity and educational impact and argue that they are not inherent qualities of any instrument. Reliability depends not on structuring or standardisation but on sampling. Key issues concerning validity are authenticity and integration of competencies. Assessment in medical education addresses complex competencies and thus requires quantitative and qualitative information from different sources as well as professional judgement. Adequate sampling across judges, instruments and contexts can ensure both validity and reliability. Despite recognition that assessment drives learning, this relationship has been little researched, possibly because of its strong context dependence. When assessment should stimulate learning and requires adequate sampling, in authentic contexts, of the performance of complex competencies that cannot be broken down into simple parts, we need to make a shift from individual methods to an integral programme, intertwined with the education programme. Therefore, we need an instructional design perspective. Programmatic instructional design hinges on a careful description and motivation of choices, whose effectiveness should be measured against the intended outcomes. We should not evaluate individual methods, but provide evidence of the utility of the assessment programme as a whole.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.schut@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                Journal
                Perspect Med Educ
                Perspect Med Educ
                Perspectives on Medical Education
                Bohn Stafleu van Loghum (Houten )
                2212-2761
                2212-277X
                21 October 2020
                21 October 2020
                January 2021
                : 10
                : 1
                : 6-13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5012.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0481 6099, School of Health Professions Education, Department of Educational Development and Research, , Maastricht University, ; Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [2 ]GRID grid.265436.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0421 5525, Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services, , University of the Health Sciences, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.5012.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0481 6099, School of Health Professions Education, Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, , Maastricht University, ; Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]GRID grid.5477.1, ISNI 0000000120346234, Department of Education, , Utrecht University, ; Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-399X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-6133
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-8075
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-4163
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-261X
                Article
                625
                10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w
                7809087
                33085060
                de3b7130-5fb9-4341-9f34-e5e3a0e06928
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 July 2020
                : 21 September 2020
                : 29 September 2020
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Education
                programmatic assessment,knowledge synthesis,health care professions education
                Education
                programmatic assessment, knowledge synthesis, health care professions education

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content163

                Cited by29

                Most referenced authors480