5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Return to driving post upper or lower extremity orthopaedic surgical procedures: a scoping review of current published literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          • Patients undergoing planned or unplanned orthopaedic procedures involving their upper or lower extremity can prevent them from safe and timely return to driving, where they commonly ask, ‘Doctor, when can I drive?’ Driving recommendations after such procedures are varied. The current evidence available is based on a heterogenous data set with varying degrees of sample size and markedly differing study designs.

          • This instructional review article provides a scoping overview of studies looking at return to driving after upper or lower extremity surgery in both trauma and elective settings and, where possible, to provide clinical recommendations for return to driving.

          • Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases were searched according to a defined search protocol to elicit eligible studies. Articles were included if they reviewed adult drivers who underwent upper or lower extremity orthopaedic procedures, were written in English, and offered recommendations about driving.

          • A total of 68 articles were included in the analysis, with 36 assessing the lower extremity and 37 reviewing the upper extremity. The evidence available from the studies reviewed was of poor methodological quality. There was a lack of adequately powered, high quality, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample sizes to assess safe return to driving for differing subset of injuries.

          • Many articles provide generic guidelines on return to driving when patients feel safe to perform an emergency stop procedure with adequate steering wheel control.

          • In future, RCTs should be performed to develop definitive return to driving protocols in patients undergoing upper and lower extremity procedures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review

            Objective This review aimed to determine if the use of the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) model as a search strategy tool affects the quality of a literature search. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA), Scopus, and the National Library of Medicine (NLM) catalog up until January 9, 2017. Reference lists were scrutinized, and citation searches were performed on the included studies. The primary outcome was the quality of literature searches and the secondary outcome was time spent on the literature search when the PICO model was used as a search strategy tool, compared to the use of another conceptualizing tool or unguided searching. Results A total of 2,163 records were identified, and after removal of duplicates and initial screening, 22 full-text articles were assessed. Of these, 19 studies were excluded and 3 studies were included, data were extracted, risk of bias was assessed, and a qualitative analysis was conducted. The included studies compared PICO to the PIC truncation or links to related articles in PubMed, PICOS, and sample, phenomenon of interest, design, evaluation, research type (SPIDER). One study compared PICO to unguided searching. Due to differences in intervention, no quantitative analysis was performed. Conclusions Only few studies exist that assess the effect of the PICO model vis-a-vis other available models or even vis-a-vis the use of no model. Before implications for current practice can be drawn, well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the role of the tool used to devise a search strategy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Functional Changes and Driving Performance in Older Drivers: Assessment and Interventions

              With the increasing aging of the population, the number of older drivers is rising. Driving is a significant factor for quality of life and independence concerning social and working life. On the other hand, driving is a complex task involving visual, motor, and cognitive skills that experience age-related changes even in healthy aging. In this review we summarize different age-related functional changes with relevance for driving concerning sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Since these functions have great interindividual variability, it is necessary to apply methods that help to identify older drivers with impaired driving abilities in order to take appropriate measures. We discuss three different methods to assess driving ability, namely the assessment of (i) functions relevant for driving; (ii) driving behavior in real traffic; and (iii) behavior in a driving simulator. We present different measures to improve mobility in older drivers, including information campaigns, design of traffic and car environment, instructions, functional training, and driving training in real traffic and in a driving simulator. Finally, we give some recommendations for assessing and improving the driving abilities of older drivers with multi-modal approaches being most promising for enhancing individual and public safety.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFORT Open Rev
                EFORT Open Rev
                eor
                EFORT Open Reviews
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2058-5241
                01 December 2023
                01 December 2023
                : 8
                : 12
                : 936-947
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Leeds Orthopaedic & Trauma Sciences , School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
                [2 ]Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds, England
                [3 ]Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine , University of Leeds, Leeds, England
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to V P Giannoudis; Email: vgiannoudis@ 123456aol.com

                *(M Khaliq and V P Giannoudis contributed equally to this work)

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-7308
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-5426
                Article
                EOR-23-0117
                10.1530/EOR-23-0117
                10714384
                38038382
                86ad31e4-5b62-4fe2-958a-ff46f8844f2a
                © the author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                Categories
                Trauma
                trauma, Trauma
                return to driving
                brake reaction time (BRT)
                upper extremity
                lower extremity
                Custom metadata
                trauma

                return to driving,brake reaction time (brt),upper extremity,lower extremity

                Comments

                Comment on this article