7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study of mirtazapine for agitated behaviours in dementia (SYMBAD): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Agitation is common in people with dementia and negatively affects the quality of life of both people with dementia and carers. Non-drug patient-centred care is the first-line treatment, but there is a need for other treatment when this care is not effective. Current evidence is sparse on safer and effective alternatives to antipsychotics. We assessed the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine, an antidepressant prescribed for agitation in dementia.

          Methods

          This parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial—the Study of Mirtazapine for Agitated Behaviours in Dementia trial (SYMBAD)—was done in 26 UK centres. Participants had probable or possible Alzheimer's disease, agitation unresponsive to non-drug treatment, and a Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) score of 45 or more. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either mirtazapine (titrated to 45 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was reduction in CMAI score at 12 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03031184, and ISRCTN17411897.

          Findings

          Between Jan 26, 2017, and March 6, 2020, 204 participants were recruited and randomised. Mean CMAI scores at 12 weeks were not significantly different between participants receiving mirtazapine and participants receiving placebo (adjusted mean difference –1·74, 95% CI –7·17 to 3·69; p=0·53). The number of controls with adverse events (65 [64%] of 102 controls) was similar to that in the mirtazapine group (67 [66%] of 102 participants receiving mirtazapine). However, there were more deaths in the mirtazapine group (n=7) by week 16 than in the control group (n=1), with post-hoc analysis suggesting this difference was of marginal statistical significance (p=0·065).

          Interpretation

          This trial found no benefit of mirtazapine compared with placebo, and we observed a potentially higher mortality with use of mirtazapine. The data from this study do not support using mirtazapine as a treatment for agitation in dementia.

          Funding

          UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Dementia prevention, intervention, and care

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group* under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease

            Neurology, 34(7), 939-939
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Assessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia

              Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia include agitation, depression, apathy, repetitive questioning, psychosis, aggression, sleep problems, wandering, and a variety of inappropriate behaviors. One or more of these symptoms will affect nearly all people with dementia over the course of their illness. These symptoms are among the most complex, stressful, and costly aspects of care, and they lead to a myriad of poor patient health outcomes, healthcare problems, and income loss for family care givers. The causes include neurobiologically related disease factors; unmet needs; care giver factors; environmental triggers; and interactions of individual, care giver, and environmental factors. The complexity of these symptoms means that there is no “one size fits all solution,” and approaches tailored to the patient and the care giver are needed. Non-pharmacologic approaches should be used first line, although several exceptions are discussed. Non-pharmacologic approaches with the strongest evidence base involve family care giver interventions. Regarding pharmacologic treatments, antipsychotics have the strongest evidence base, although the risk to benefit ratio is a concern. An approach to integrating non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments is described. Finally, the paradigm shift needed to fully institute tailored treatments for people and families dealing with these symptoms in the community is discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                23 October 2021
                23 October 2021
                : 398
                : 10310
                : 1487-1497
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
                [b ]Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
                [c ]Joint Clinical Research Office, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
                [d ]Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
                [e ]Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
                [f ]College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
                [g ]Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
                [h ]University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [i ]Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
                [j ]Department of Psychiatry, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
                [k ]Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, UK
                [l ]Former Carer, Alzheimer's Society Research Network, University of Cambridge School of Medicine, Cambridge, UK
                [m ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Medicine, Cambridge, UK
                [n ]Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
                [o ]Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Prof Sube Banerjee, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK sube.banerjee@ 123456plymouth.ac.uk
                Article
                S0140-6736(21)01210-1
                10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01210-1
                8546216
                34688369
                37a22257-7591-4f9a-9c8d-6b4b946321e5
                © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article