2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Mechanical and biological characteristics of 3D fabricated clay mineral and bioceramic composite scaffold for bone tissue applications.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          3D printing technology provides a platform to fabricate a wide range of structures and complex geometry-based scaffolds through computer-aided design (CAD). This study investigates the possibility of developing Bentonite(BEN)/Hydroxyapatite(HAP) scaffold with different HAP wt% (25, 50, 75) using a 3D printing technique (Robocasting) for potential bone tissue applications. Thermal stability of the composites was characterized in TGA and rheological properties of slurries were observed to have different viscosity and shear stress, especially BEN-HAP 50 wt% achieves all criteria for high-quality printing. The fabricated scaffolds were subjected to sintering from 200 °C to 1000 °C for proper densification and attained a maximum compression strength of 52 MPa at 1000 °C for the printed structures. Changes in crystallinity and functional groups were observed as well with respective sintering temperatures. In this study, we also discussed the extrusion and rheological properties of the composite slurry. Porosity, water absorption, degradation and density were studied to understand the physical properties of the sintered scaffolds. The biological characteristics of the scaffold were studied using MG63 cell lines In vitro biocompatibility study and expressed 91% of viability for the 1000 °C sintered samples under controlled culture conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

            Traditionally, bioactive glasses have been used to fill and restore bone defects. More recently, this category of biomaterials has become an emerging research field for bone tissue engineering applications. Here, we review and discuss current knowledge on porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds on the basis of melt-derived bioactive silicate glass compositions and relevant composite structures. Starting with an excerpt on the history of bioactive glasses, as well as on fundamental requirements for bone tissue engineering scaffolds, a detailed overview on recent developments of bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds will be given, including a summary of common fabrication methods and a discussion on the microstructural-mechanical properties of scaffolds in relation to human bone (structure-property and structure-function relationship). In addition, ion release effects of bioactive glasses concerning osteogenic and angiogenic responses are addressed. Finally, areas of future research are highlighted in this review.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.

              During extrusion-based bioprinting, the deposited bioink filaments are subjected to deformations, such as collapse of overhanging filaments, which compromises the ability to stack several layers of bioink, and fusion between adjacent filaments, which compromises the resolution and maintenance of a desired pore structure. When developing new bioinks, approaches to assess their shape fidelity after printing would be beneficial to evaluate the degree of deformation of the deposited filament and to estimate how similar the final printed construct would be to the design. However, shape fidelity has been prevalently assessed qualitatively through visual inspection after printing, hampering the direct comparison of the printability of different bioinks. In this technical note, we propose a quantitative evaluation for shape fidelity of bioinks based on testing the filament collapse on overhanging structures and the filament fusion of parallel printed strands. Both tests were applied on a hydrogel platform based on poloxamer 407 and poly(ethylene glycol) blends, providing a library of hydrogels with different yield stresses. The presented approach is an easy way to assess bioink shape fidelity, applicable to any filament-based bioprinting system and able to quantitatively evaluate this aspect of printability, based on the degree of deformation of the printed filament. In addition, we built a simple theoretical model that relates filament collapse with bioink yield stress. The results of both shape fidelity tests underline the role of yield stress as one of the parameters influencing the printability of a bioink. The presented quantitative evaluation will allow for reproducible comparisons between different bioink platforms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
                Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
                Elsevier BV
                1878-0180
                1878-0180
                Feb 2023
                : 138
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School Of Bioscience And Technology, Vellore Institute Of Technology (VIT), Katpadi, Vellore, 632014, Tamil nadu, India.
                [2 ] school Of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute Of Technology (VIT), Katpadi, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
                [3 ] School Of Bioscience And Technology, Vellore Institute Of Technology (VIT), Katpadi, Vellore, 632014, Tamil nadu, India. Electronic address: sunitanayak@vit.ac.in.
                Article
                S1751-6161(22)00538-0
                10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105633
                36603527
                a026649e-2e81-4e68-8508-b9516012f276
                History

                Robocasting,Bone tissue engineering,Clay mineral/ceramic scaffold,Cost-effective

                Comments

                Comment on this article